Forward modeling

Forward modelling is the first step for inverting data for the reconstruction of the defect. For this purpose, the specialised code is better adapted because it is faster than the general code. 

The second main category of neural networks is the feedforward type. In this type of network, the signals go in only one direction there are no loops in the system as shown in Fig. 3. The earliest neural network models were linear feed forward. In 1972, two simultaneous articles independently proposed the same model for an associative memory, the linear associator. J. A. Anderson [17], neurophysiologist, and Teuvo Kohonen [18], an electrical engineer, were unaware of each other s work. Today, the most commonly used neural networks are nonlinear feed-forward models. 

Current feed-forward network architectures work better than the current feed-back architectures for a number of reasons. First, the capacity of feed-back networks is unimpressive. Secondly, in the running mode, feed-forward models are faster, since they need to make one pass through the system to find a solution. In contrast, feed-back networks must cycle repetitively until... 

In most cases models describing biogeochemical cycles are used to estimate the concentration (or total mass) in the various reservoirs based on information about source and sink processes, as in the examples given in Section 4.4. This is often called forward modeling. If direct measurements of the concentration are available, they can be compared to the model estimates. This process is referred to as model testing. If there are significant differences between observations and model simulations, improvements in the model are necessary. A natural step is then to reconsider the specification of the sources and/or the sinks and perform additional simulations. 

The concept of a T2 cut-off that partitions the relaxation time distribution between the pores which can be displaced and those that cannot does not always apply. An exception is when there is significant diffusional coupling between the micropores that retain water at a high capillary pressure and the macropores in close proximity to the microporous system [26, 27]. A spectral BVI model or a forward model has been suggested to interpret these systems [30, 31, 53]. 

E. J. Fordham, W. E. Kenyon, D. J. Wilkinson 1999, (Forward models for nuclear magnetic resonance in carbonate rocks), Log Analyst 40 (4), 260-270. 

Table 9.1. Mineral-liquid partition coefficients used for the forward modeling of batch-melting.

Rare earth element data will also serve as the basis for a forward modeling study to better constrain melting systematics in the Galapagos. The melting model will invoke clinopyroxene-rare earth element partition coefficients, which vary with composition (Gallahan and Nielsen, 1992), and a polybaric or column melting process. 

As shovm in Figure 5-20, the closure age and closure temperature can be calculated at each point along the °Ar concentration profile using forward modeling. 

In this paper, after the description of the general features for the retrieval model (Sect. 2) and the optimisations implemented in both the forward model and Jacobian calculation for matching the run-time requirements (Sect. 3 and 4), we will focus on the validation tests that have been performed on the code (Sect.5) and on the accuracy and run-time performances of the retrieval algorithm (Sect. 6 and Sect. 7). 

The instrument observes the radiance emitted by the atmosphere at different values of the spectral frequency and the limb-viewing angle. The dependence of the spectra on the unknown profiles is not linear. A theoretical model, called forward model, simulates the observations through a set of parameters, i.e. the atmospheric profiles that have to be retrieved. The inversion method consists in the search for the set of values of the parameters that produce the best simulation of the observations. 

Each profile is retrieved at an altitude grid defined by the tangent altitude levels of the limb scan sequence (or a subset of them) and at intermediate altitudes an interpolated value is used in the forward model. 

The most time consuming parts of the forward model are the calculation of the absorption coefficients and the calculation of the radiative transfer. A spectral resolution of Av = 0.0005 cm 1 is considered necessary in order to resolve the shape of Doppler-broadened lines. To avoid repeated line-shape and radiative transfer calculations at this high resolution, two optimizations have been implemented ... 

In order to limit the complexity of the code and meet the computing time requirements, some simplifications have been adopted in the forward model. In particular, some effects have up to now been neglected in both the spectroscopic and the atmospheric model. 

ORM assumes that the atmosphere is in local thermodynamic equilibrium this means that the temperature of the Boltzmann distribution is equal to the kinetic temperature and that the source function in Eq. (4) is equal to the Planck function at the local kinetic temperature. This LTE model is expected to be valid at the lower altitudes where kinetic collisions are frequent. In the stratosphere and mesosphere excitation mechanisms such as photochemical processes and solar pumping, combined with the lower collision relaxation rates make possible that many of the vibrational levels of atmospheric constituents responsible for infrared emissions have excitation temperatures which differ from the local kinetic temperature. It has been found [18] that many C02 bands are strongly affected by non-LTE. However, since the handling of Non-LTE would severely increase the retrieval computing time, it was decided to select only microwindows that are in thermodynamic equilibrium to avoid Non-LTE calculations in the forward model. 

The approximations that have been implemented in the optimised forward model (OFM) have been validated comparing the results with a specially developed line-by-line code developed at Oxford University [18] and based on GENLN2 [19]. This code was compared with several existing codes and was elected as our reference forward model (RFM). The main results of the RFM / OFM intercomparisons are ... 

The retrieval code has been validated by performing retrievals from spectra generated by its own forward model and by the RFM. Tests are in progress with spectra obtained with a balloon instrument. 

The results obtained so far indicate that both forward model error, i.e. error due to imperfect modeling of the atmosphere, and convergence error, i.e. error due to the feet that the inversion procedure does not find the real minimum of the %2 function, are much smaller than the measurement error due to radiometric noise. 

Edwards, D. P. (1997) High Level algorithm definition document of the MIPAS Reference Forward Model, ESA Report PO-TN-OXF-GS-0004. 

Venkat Venkatasubramanian No. There are two ways we handle the knowledge-based guidance, ft can be done in real time with the modeler going back and forth between iterations and then guiding the iterations either in the forward model development method, for which the modeler proposes different scenarios, or in the inverse model method, for which the algorithm does the search. The modeler can actually stop the search and force it to go some other direction, based on intuition and experience in how the molecular structure evolves. 

Collins PC, Roginski RT. 2006. Feed-forward modeling approach to particle size control in milling operations. AIChE Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, November. 

Figure 12.3. Forward Modelling of State Variable Mismatch by Neural Network...

In the second mode, a consistent treatment of the emission injection and vertical transport would be achieved. In particular, the adjoint formulation of diffusion and convection in data assimilation would be consistent with the forward model. However, dislocation of the chemistry tendencies is more likely than in case 1 because the IPS concentration fields tend to differ more from the CTM fields. 

Upwards directed interaction between the different lithologies largely depends on the temperature gradient within the oceanic lithosphere, which is among the most difficult parameters to model. Thus, at present, a purely forward model for mass transfer in a given subduction zone is not reliable, geochemical information on the subduction output (see Chapters 2.11 and 3.18) is necessary to constrain likely mass-transfer processes. 

Forward geochemical modeling. Given an initial water of known composition and a rock of known mineralogy and composition, the rock and water are computationally reacted under a given set of conditions (constant or variable temperature, pressure, and water composition) to produce rock and water (or set of rocks and waters). In forward modeling the products are inferred from an assumed set of conditions (equilibrium or not, phases allowed to precipitate or not, etc.) and thermodynamic and/or kinetic data are necessary. 

---