Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Flow, control structure valve

More than 100 micro structured devices are listed on the homepage of the pChemTec consortium [24]. The devices cover physical applications such as flow distribution, mixing, heat transfer, phase transfer, emulsification and suspension, as well as chemical applications such as chemical and biochemical processing. Some separation units such as membrane separation and capillary electrophoresis are also offered. Control devices such as valves, micro pumps for product analysis and mass flow controllers supplement the catalog. [Pg.517]

Some support structures are also included for detachably retaining the various components of the system. Preferably the support structure can be of the assembly board type , which provides prearranged flow channels and connector ports. The desired components of the system can be fastened into these connectors by pins. The flow control system that makes up the ICS system can include pumps, flow channels, manifolds, flow restrictors, valves, etc. These components are equipped with the necessary fittings that allow them to be sealed with the prearranged or selectively located flow channels or connectors. The flow system can also include detachable mixing devices, e.g., static or ultrasonic, or with a chip-like design. The reaction units, whether chip-like or not, can be of thermal, electrochemical, photochemical or pressure type [84]. [Pg.546]

The control structure shown in Figure 6.57 is installed on the flowsheet. The feed is flow-controlled. The outlet temperature is controlled by manipulating the coolant flowrate. Note that the OP signal is sent to both of the control valves on the coolant stream, opening and closing them simultaneously. The setup works in the simulations, but it is not what would be used in a real physical system. A pressure-driven simulation in Aspen Plus requires that valves be placed on both the inlet and outlet coolant streams. In a real system, the cooling water would be drawn from a supply header, which operates a fixed pressure. A single control valve would be used, either on the inlet or on the outlet, to manipulate the flowrate of coolant. [Pg.333]

Had we started to assign the DIB column base level control first, we would have ended up with the same inventory control structure. The reason is as follows. Assume we had chosen the DIB column base valve to control base level. After resolving the purge column inventory loops, we would have found that we needed to control the purge column base or reflux drum level with the fresh feed flow to the DIB column. The dynamic lags associated with these loops would have forced us back to the control strategy as described above. [Pg.282]

The choice of which to use depends on the column reflux ratio. Conventional distillation wisdom recommends that columns with reflux ratios less than about 3 can use a control structure in which reflux-drum level is controlled by manipulating the distillate flow rate. However, columns with higher reflux ratios should control reflux-drum level with reflux flow rate. The logic here is to avoid saturation of the control valve. [Pg.170]

An alternative simulation was developed using the Flash3 model, as shown in Figure 8.40b after exporting and installing a control structure. In Aspen Plus, a vapor line with a valve is added. The decanter is specified to be adiabatic and at a fixed pressure (0.6 atm). The temperature specified in the upstream condenser HX2 is adjusted to 320 K to give a very small vapor flow rate (3% of the feed). After the file is exported, a pressure controller is inserted on the decanter, but it is put on manual and the vapor valve is closed. Now decanter pressure varies with temperature and composition. Its steady-state value is 0.366 atm with the decanter temperature controller set point set at 313 K so that a direct comparison with the previous case can be studied. [Pg.233]

In the last three chapters, we have developed a number of conventional control structures dual-composition, single-end with RR, single-end with rellux-to-feed, tray temperature control, and so on. Structures with steam-to-feed ratios have also been demonstrated to reduce transient disturbances. Four out of the six control degrees of freedom (six available valves) are used to control the four variables of throughput, pressure, reflux-drum level, and base level. Throughput is normally controlled by the feed valve. In on-demand control structures, throughput is set by the flow rate of one of the product streams. Pressure is typically controlled by condenser heat removal. Base liquid level is normally controlled by bottoms flow rate. [Pg.238]

Valve Position Control Structure. Hori and Skogestad proposed another alternative stmcture that is similar to valve position controller (VPC). The idea is to slowly adjust the distillate flow rate to drive the reflux flow rate back to a value that corresponds to the desired reflux-to-feed ratio. [Pg.251]

The reflux drum and column base are sized to provide 5 min of liquid holdup when half full. The file is pressure checked and exported to Aspen Dynamics. The initial control scheme that opens is shown in Figure 11.26. Note that there is a level controller (LCW1) that pulls off free water from the reflux dmm. The other level controller (LC12) manipulates reflux flow rate to hold the liquid level of the organic phase in the reflux dmm. Since the reflux ratio is only 0.344 in this column, we change the control structure to hold reflux-dmm level with the NAPHTHA flow rate (valve V12). Pressure controller PCI manipulates the valve V14 in the vapor line. [Pg.328]

The ramp disturbances are imposed on the process using each of the three control structures. The temperature and valve-position controllers are tuned by running relay-feedback tests. Deadtimes of 1 min are used in these loops. Temperature controller TCI is tuned at the normal design feed flow rate (4000 kmol/h), and Tyreus-Luyben tuning give Kc = 31 and Ti = 9.2min. [Pg.431]

This chapter has been structured into four sections firstly, the principles governing the centrifugal hydrodynamics on rotational platforms are briefly discussed. Next, externally actuated (active) and rotationally controlled ( passive ) valving schemes are outlined. To form fully integrated centrifugal LoaD platforms that can operate in a sample-to-answer fashion with low-complexity instrumentation, we finally present process automation of networked LUOs through novel, rotationally, and/ or event-triggered flow control schemes as well as common detection techniques. [Pg.370]

A schematic ofa pilot plant is shown in Figure 11.5. The pilot plant was 1500 mm wide, 900 mm long and 1500 mm high. Figure 11.6 shows the internal structure of the pilot plant in which 20 microreactors were set up in a constant-temperature bath. The inside of the pilot plant has a lower and upper step structure and it is composed of a flow control system, temperature and reaction control system and monitoring system. The flow control system consisted of non-pulsatile pumps and tanks in the lower step and electromagnetic valves and needle valves in the upper step. The withstand... [Pg.1257]

The worst-case disturbance considered here is up to 20% changes in the reaction rate constant Ao, e.g., reflecting disturbances in the fresh feed conditions (a 20% disturbance in feed composition gives essentially identical results). The performance requirement is that the product composition should satisfy > 0.99, Vr. We assume that all nominal flows correspond to 50% valve openings. All liquid levels are assumed to be perfectly controlled, but we stress that this is not important for the results we present since we consider rejection of composition related disturbances only. For the case of flow disturbances, not considered here, the choice of the level control structure will influence the results. [Pg.310]

Beebe DJ, Moore JS, Bauer JM et al (2000) Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels. Nature 404 588-590 Benard WL, Kahn H, Heuer AH, Huff MA (1998) Thin-film shape-memory alloy actuated micropumps. J Microelectromech Syst 7 245-251 Benito-Lopez F, Antonana-Diez M, Curto VF et al (2014) Modular microfluidic valve structures based on reversible thermoresponsive ionogel actuators. Lab Chip 14 3530-3538 Chin CD, Linder V, Sia SK (2012) Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 12 2118-2134... [Pg.97]

The fresh C5 stream containing the reactive isoamylenes and the chemically inert other C5 components is fed into the reactor on flow control. The methanol fed to the prereactor is ratioed to the fresh feed flowrate. The exit temperamre of the reactor is controlled using a ternperamre/temperamre cascade structure. The reactor effluent temperamre controller changes the setpoint of the circulating cooling water temperamre controller, which manipulates the cooling water makeup valve (see Fig. 14.7). [Pg.397]

Initial Sketch. Figure 2 shows a process flow diagram for a petrochemical plant (1,2). This drawing shows the feed and products so the designer knows what to allow for these lines in the interunit pipeway routing. The process engineer has indicated with notes which pieces of equipment will be located in elevated structures, such as the overhead condensers, and has also shown which equipment should be located close by other equipment, such as the reboiler next to its column. Primary instrumentation is shown to indicate that room is required for instrument drops to these control valves. All this... [Pg.70]

Nuclear Boiler Assembly. This assembly consists of the equipment and instrumentation necessary to produce, contain, and control the steam required by the turbine-generator. The principal components of the nuclear boiler are (1) reactor vessel and internals—reactor pressure vessel, jet pumps for reactor water circulation, steam separators and dryers, and core support structure (2) reactor water recirculation system—pumps, valves, and piping used in providing and controlling core flow (3) main steam lines—main steam safety and relief valves, piping, and pipe supports from reactor pressure vessel up to and including the isolation valves outside of the primary containment barrier (4) control rod drive system—control rods, control rod drive mechanisms and hydraulic system for insertion and withdrawal of the control rods and (5) nuclear fuel and in-core instrumentation,... [Pg.1103]

Simulation of Mouth Conditions for Flavor Analysis The RAS is not intended to simulate the size or structure of the mouth. The conditions in the mouth expected to affect volatility—i.e., temperature, breath flow, mastication, and salivation—are simulated. Temperature iscontrolled with a waterjacket (37°C). Gas (N2 or purified air) flow is controlled with a variable-area needle-valve flow meter (20 ml/sec). The shearing resulting from mastication is implemented with blender blades and a high-torque variable-... [Pg.1082]


See other pages where Flow, control structure valve is mentioned: [Pg.694]    [Pg.940]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.1334]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.1156]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.1001]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.563]   


SEARCH



Control valve

Flow control

Flow controllers

Flow structures

Structural control

Structural controllability

Structured flows

© 2024 chempedia.info