Failure point, definition

As a convention, the failure point is hereafter defined by the maximum stress point on the stress-strain curves. This definition may lead to confusion, but in the industrial context, it is assumed that the propellant structure presents an extended irreversible degradation beyond this point which is incompatible with safe application. 

Fault Tree Analysis. Fault trees represent a deductive approach to determining the causes contributing to a designated failure. The approach begins with the definition of a top or undesired event, and branches backward through intermediate events until the top event is defined in terms of basic events. A basic event is an event for which further development would not be useful for the purpose at hand. For example, for a quantitative fault tree, if a frequency or probabiUty for a failure can be deterrnined without further development of the failure logic, then there is no point to further development, and the event is regarded as basic. 

In applying the definition of rehabihty, the concept of adequate performance must be estabhshed clearly. Products usually do not fail suddenly, but degrade over time. Gasket leaks on equipment, for example, may start as a slow weep and increase in volume over time. The point at which this undesirable occurrence is called a failure must be clear before rehabihty can be measured objectively. Changing the failure definition for a product changes its rehabihty level, although the product itself has not changed. 

To meet this requirement, a company must define an incident in specific terms for their facility. This includes an operational definition that indicates the number of pounds of the substance used in a particular process that would qualify as a catastrophic event . Defining an incident in site-specific terms also includes defining the terms "could reasonably have resulted in . Appendix C of the regulation provides guidelines for clarifying this point. It includes definitions of "near misses in which a catastrophic failure occurred, but a chemical release did not occur. Clear guidelines should be established that provide the employee with a quantifiable means of defining those incidents that require a violation report. 

The compressive data are of limited design value. They can be used for comparative material evaluation and design purposes if the conditions of the test approximate those of the application. The data are of definite value for materials that fail in the compressive test by a shattering fracture. On the other hand, for those that do not fail in this manner, the compressive information is arbitrary and is determined by selecting a point of compressive deformation at which it is considered that a complete failure of the material has taken place. About 10% of deformation are viewed in most cases as maximum. 

In many applications we consider the yield point of a polymer to be its point of failure. We base this definition on whether the material is still fit for its end use once it has yielded. Thus, if the teeth on a polymer gear wheel yield, they will change shape and may become useless. Alternatively, packaging film may yield, but still maintain its barrier properties and be fit for continued use. 

These examples indicate that it is necessary to keep the possible effect of point defects on bulk and mechanical properties in mind. Although less definitive than electronic and optical properties, they may make the difference in the success or failure of device operation. 

Failure occurs when the component ceases to perform its required function. In the case of catastrophic failure, such as the rupture of a pipe or electrical breakdown of an insulator, this is obvious, but in many cases there is no such clear end of life. For example, is the end point when a small amount of environmental stress cracking has occurred, or when cracks have reached 5 mm in length Broadly, the definition of end point is that a property has reached a level at which safety, performance or market acceptance dictate that the component or product can no longer be used. 

Using market research techniques for a new product as yet unknown to potential users is more apt to result in failure than success. End users, fabricators, and other purchasing influences generally respond objectively and frankly when questioned on the potential value of a new product. On a second interview, however, it would be difficult to obtain more definitive statements on precise potential by year for volume, price, package type, order points, and... 

In summary, failure to detect a rigidly achiral presentation does not mean that such a presentation cannot be found among the infinitely many presentations of a knot failure to interconvert enantiomorphous presentations by ambient isotopy does not exclude the possibility that an interconversion pathway can be found among the infinitely many pathways that are available and a palindromic knot polynomial does not necessarily mean that the knot is amphicheiral. Consequently, it may be impossible in certain cases to determine with complete certainty whether a knot is topologically chiral or not. The fundamental task of the theory of knots was stated over a hundred years ago by its foremost pioneer Given the number of its double points, to find all the essentially different forms which a closed curve can assume. 15 Yet to find invariants that will definitively determine whether or not a knot is chiral remains an unsolved problem to this day.63a Vassiliev invariants have been conjectured to be such perfect invariants.63b... 

Fracture properties arguably are not rheological properties, but mechanical properties, given the standard definition of rheology (see above). However, failure of structure in foods, especially high-fat foods, usually begins at strains below the actual fracture point, the point at which the... 

Another aspect of diffraction experiments that is often overlooked is the presence of amorphous materials, the amount of which cannot be easily quantified from a diffraction experiment. As pointed out above, there is no consensus on whether amorphous solids should be considered a form of the substance under investigation. On the one hand, the amorphous component of a given substance is the same chemical as the crystalline material. When melted or dissolved in a solvent the amorphous phase of a molecular material will yield the same molecules as those in crystals, thus falling within McCrone s definition, but will behave as a different solid. On the other hand, an amorphous material may be several different systems. After all, the only difference between a microcrystalline powder and an amorphous powder is the failure to obey the restrictions of Bragg s law. 

But they should not worry The important point is not to develop a crisp definition to delineate the differences among the terms, but to capture and document that a failure of some sort occurred (Hopkins, 2009). Regardless of whether a particular metric is classified as a lagging indicator, a near miss, or a leading indicator, the purpose of the metric is to establish good indicators of conditions that could ultimately lead to a severe event. 

Since is a real number, it alone cannot fully characterize the crack tip field. In order to specify K, which has two real components, the phase angle ip defined by Eq. (5) is also required. Using this definition, a point in the (( , ip) plane is uniquely related to a point in the (JCj, Ku ) plane. Following the concept of failure locus introduced by Rice [20] for a given phase angle ip, the interface crack will... 

---