Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fracture property

It is very important, from one hand, to accept a hypothesis about the material fracture properties before physical model building because general view of TF is going to change depending on mechanical model (brittle, elasto-plastic, visco-elasto-plastic, ete.) of the material. From the other hand, it is necessary to keep in mind that the material response to loads or actions is different depending on the accepted mechanical model because rheological properties of the material determine type of response in time. The most remarkable difference can be observed between brittle materials and materials with explicit plastic properties. [Pg.191]

Fracture Properties Fracture toughness defines the stress distribution in the body just before fraciure and is given by... [Pg.1886]

Step 3. The set of fracture properties G(t) are related to the interfaee structure H(t) through suitable deformation mechanisms deduced from the micromechanics of fracture. This is the most difficult part of the problem but the analysis of the fracture process in situ can lead to valuable information on the microscopic deformation mechanisms. SEM, optical and XPS analysis of the fractured interface usually determine the mode of fracture (cohesive, adhesive or mixed) and details of the fracture micromechanics. However, considerable modeling may be required with entanglement and chain fracture mechanisms to realize useful solutions since most of the important events occur within the deformation zone before new fracture surfaces are created. We then obtain a solution to the problem. [Pg.355]

Fracture energies have been determined for bond failure at either end of the bond line for a sheared rubber block, but the results are inconclusive—it is not clear where bond failure will occur, or at what load, even when the fracture properties of the rubber are known. Thus, the initiation of cracks, especially at interfaces and comers, needs further study. [Pg.19]

Goldman, M. (1985). Fracture properties of composite and glass ionomer dental restorative materials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 19, 771-83. [Pg.181]

Table 5. Comparison of Fracture Properties of Agglomerated Materials... Table 5. Comparison of Fracture Properties of Agglomerated Materials...
Bader M.G., Bailey J.E. and Bell 1. (1973). The effect of fiber-matrix interface strength on the impact and fracture properties of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin composites. J. Phys. D Appi. Phvs. 6, 572-586. [Pg.320]

Low, I.M. and Mai, Y.W. (1990). Fracture properties and failure mechanisms of pure and toughened epoxy resins. In Handbook of Ceramics (N.P. Cheremisinoff ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 105-160. [Pg.363]

The flexural and fracture properties of some common CMCs are given in Table 5.10, compared to their unreinforced matrix materials. Notice that the SiC fibers described... [Pg.507]

Fracture Properties of Candidate Metals. Recall that the opening mode stress intensity factor for the case of a component containing a single edge crack in tension, Ki, is given by Eq. (5.47), where Y = 1.12 for the geometry under consideration here ... [Pg.823]

Regardless of the method of cross-linking, mechanical properties of a cross-linked elastomer depend on cross-link density. Modulus and hardness increase monotonically with cross-link density, and at the same time, the network becomes more elastic. Fracture properties, i.e., tensile and tear strength, pass through a maximum as the cross-link density increases (see Figure 5.4). [Pg.102]

The conclusion to be made from this work is that the fiber and its properties as well as the epoxy matrix and its properties are the same for all three cases. Only the interphase has been altered. Strength of materials fracture models would not predict a difference in fracture toughness and yet experimentally alteration of a 200 nm interphase zone changes the composite fracture properties dramatically. [Pg.26]

Given the existence of interphases and the multiplicity of components and reactions that interact to form it, a predictive model for a priori prediction of composition, size, structure or behavior is not possible at this time except for the simplest of systems. An in-situ probe that can interogate the interphase and provide spatial chemical and morphological information does not exist. Interfacial static mechanical properties, fracture properties and environmental resistance have been shown to be grealy affected by the interphase. Careful analytical interfacial investigations will be required to quantify the interphase structure. With the proper amount of information, progress may be made to advance the ability to design composite materials in which the interphase can be considered as a material variable so that the proper relationship between composite components will be modified to include the interphase as well as the fiber and matrix (Fig. 26). [Pg.30]

As will be discussed, incorporation of siloxane oligomers modified the elastic moduli and the fracture properties of the crosslinked epoxy network. Previous work 15) indicated that the surface of these materials was rich in siloxane, which is believed to foster a low energy surface. These characteristic properties have led to our interest in the friction and wear of siloxane-modified epoxies. [Pg.82]

The fracture properties of foods have been extensively studied and comprehensive reviews (64 and references therein) exist that address testing and application of fracture data in the food industry. As mentioned earlier, in the food industry compression tests are viewed also as fracture tests and the yield stress is often regarded as the fracture stress. However, in this review, the discussion is confined to only those types of fracture tests that lead to estimates of the fracture toughness and not the yield stress. The fracture toughness tests are relatively recent in the food industry. [Pg.301]

Bisphenol A polycarbonate (BPA-PC), whose the chemical structure is shown in Fig. 66a, has very interesting fracture properties, exhibiting quite a high toughness for a pure amorphous polymer. At a very low temperature (- 100 °C at 1 Hz) it presents a secondary fi transition, shown in Fig. 67, which has been analysed in detail in [1] (Sect. 5). [Pg.296]

The p relaxation can play a very important role in fracture properties. For comparable Tg values, for instance 100°C, amine-crosslinked epoxies are considerably more ductile and tough than unsaturated polyesters. [Pg.309]


See other pages where Fracture property is mentioned: [Pg.1820]    [Pg.1887]    [Pg.1887]    [Pg.1887]    [Pg.1888]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.1242]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.297]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.6 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.378 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info