Explosion effect models applications

There has been an explosion in the application of atomistic and molecular modeling to corrosion and electrochemistry in the past decade. The continued increasing computational power has allowed the development and implementation of atomistic and molecular modeling frameworks that would have been impractical even a short time ago. These frameworks allow the application of fundamental physics at the appropriate scale on assemblies of atoms of a size that provides a more realistic basis than ever before. In some cases, that level is the determination of the electronic structure based on quantum mechanics. Such is the case when determining the energetics of surface structures and reactions. In other cases, the appropriate scale requires the forces between atoms or ions to be calculated, and the effects those forces have on the configuration of atoms and how it changes with time. Surface and solution diffusion are prime examples. 

This correction plays a key role in any cosmological application. Without it, SNIa events could not be used as distance indicators. However, its purely empirical nature remains unsatisfactory to demanding theoretical minds. We would like to be able to explain physically why some explosions are weaker than others, and what effect this has on the appearance of the object. This involves building detailed models of these explosions and the way radiation is hansferred through the expanding envelope, similar to those made to describe atomic bombs or spheres struck by laser beams, which implode before exploding. 

Capello et al.16 applied LCA to 26 organic solvents (acetic acid, acetone, acetonitrile, butanol, butyl acetate, cyclohexane, cyclohexanone, diethyl ether, dioxane, dimethylformamide, ethanol, ethyl acetate, ethyl benzene, formaldehyde, formic acid, heptane, hexane, methyl ethyl ketone, methanol, methyl acetate, pentane, n- and isopropanol, tetrahydrofuran, toluene, and xylene). They applied the EHS Excel Tool36 to identify potential hazards resulting from the application of these substances. It was used to assess these compounds with respect to nine effect categories release potential, fire/explosion, reaction/decomposition, acute toxicity, irritation, chronic toxicity, persistency, air hazard, and water hazard. For each effect category, an index between zero and one was calculated, resulting in an overall score between zero and nine for each chemical. Figure 18.12 shows the life cycle model used by Capello et al.16... 

Virtually all CFD fire models assume low Mach number flow, which is adequate in typical fire application, but not for high velocity cases and explosions. Inclusion of the compressibility effects in fire simulations would increase the computational cost considerably. One of the few compressible fire models is the Uintah Computational Framework developed at C-SAFE project of the University of Utah [7],... 

ABSTRACT The determination of loads from accidental fires with realistic accuracy in the oil gas industry offshore and petrochemical industry onshore is important for the prediction of exposure of persoimel, equipment and structures to the fires. Standards, Codes of Practice and other similar publications refer to thermal loading from jet fires from 100 to 400kW/m and from 50 to 250kW/m for pool fires. The application of inappropriate fire loads may lead to incorrect predictions of fatalities, explosion of pressure vessels and collapse of structures. Further uncertainties are associated with heat transfer from the flame to pressure equipment and strucmres, and their behaviour when affected by accidental fires. The Paper presents results of a review of fire models from various Standards and Codes of Practice, and data obtained from full scale tests. A parametric study of the various methods used in the industry is presented. A simulation-based reliability assessment (SBRA) method has been applied to quantify potential accuracy range and its consequences to fire effects on structures. 

A model of explosive boiling making use of the idea of intensive homogeneous nucleation allows us not only to give a qualitative explanation to effects observed in two-phase nonequilibrium flows but also to make trustworthy quantitative evaluations (for example of critical flow rates throu short channels) which cannot be obtained with the aid of traditional schemes of heterogeneous media mechanics. The field of applicability of the model is outlined quite definitely. This model is a usefxil addition to all other models of fluid mechanics. 

In addition, just as employee participation is the key element of process safety management systems, worker involvement is crucial to the effective application of Safety Cases. Unfortunately, the perception among many that a Safety Case is a lengthy, highly technical document that can only be understood by specialists, mitigates effective employee participation. For example the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) technique used to model explosion over-pressure uses very sophisticated mathematics. This sophistication makes communication with nonspecialists a challenge. In addition the sheer size and complexity of a Safety Case may serve as a barrier to the involvement of nontechnical personnel. 

Special care should be taken particularly in the case of gas cloud explosions as the TNT method overpredicts near field effects and underpredicts far field effects. In some States the application of TNT equivalency is limited to overpressure values of 0.5 bar and other approaches are used for higher values, such as multienergy methods in which the separate effects from pressure and drag wind coming from different explosion cells are accounted for. However, the use of different TNT equivalencies in the near and far fields can overcome such a modelling deficiency. In general, TNT methods are considered suitable for greater distances from the source, for which the source mechanism is less important and such a simplified approach is more realistic and widely valid. 

---