Experiments scientific method

The scientific method is taught starting in elementary school. The first step in the scientific method is to form a hypothesis. A hypothesis is just an educated guess or logical conclusion from known facts. It is then compared against all available data and its details developed. If the hypothesis is found to be consistent with known facts, it is called a theory and usually published. The characteristics most theories have in common are that they explain observed phenomena, predict the results of future experiments, and can be presented in mathematical form. When a theory is found to be always correct for many years, it is eventually referred to as a scientific law. However useful this process is, we often use constructs that do not fit in the scientific method scheme as it is typically described. 

It IS worth remembering that a theory can never be proven correct It can only be proven incor rect incomplete or inadequate Thus theories are always being tested and refined As important as anything else in the scientific method is the testable hypothesis Once a theory is proposed experiments are designed to test its validity If the results are con sistent with the theory our belief in its soundness is strengthened If the results conflict with it the theory IS flawed and must be modified Section 6 7 describes some observations that support the theory that car bocations are intermediates in the addition of hydro gen halides to alkenes... 

Our discussion to this point has been confined to those areas in which the governing laws are well known. However, in many areas, information on the governing laws is lacking. Interest in the application of statistical methods to all types of problems has grown rapidly since World War II. Broadly speaking, statistical methods may be of use whenever conclusions are to be drawn or decisions made on the basis of experimental evidence. Since statistics could be defined as the technology of the scientific method, it is primarily concerned with the first two aspec ts of the method, namely, the performance of experiments and the drawing of conclusions from experiments. Traditionally the field is divided into two areas ... 

Scientific method (Section 6.6) A systematic approach to establishing new knowledge in which observations lead to laws, laws to theories, theories to testable hypotheses, and hypotheses to experiments. 

FIGURE 6 A summary of the principal activities that constitute a common version of the scientific method. At each stage, the crucial activity is experiment and its comparison with the ideas proposed. 

Author s comment] Because a general rendition of the Scientific Method cannot be cast in legally watertight wording, all possible outcomes of a series of measurements and pursuant actions must be in writing before the experiments are started. This includes but is not limited to the number of additional samples and measurements, and prescriptions on how to calculate and present final results. Off-the-cuff interpretations and decisions after the fact are viewed with suspicion. 

Noting that the written record should be intelligibly prepared so that others may benefit from its study (26), Crowley urged readers to examine a sample from an advanced student published in the same issue of The Equinox. He boldly asserted that the more scientific the record is, the better (26). He also cautioned that The A.A. will not take official notice of any experiments which are not thus properly recorded (25). The vision of scientific method that Crowley expressed in The Equinox would certainly have conformed to his own education in scientific research under Ramsay and Collie at London and at Cambridge. For Crowley, scientific illuminism would be characterized by meticulous and objective record keeping of laboratory experiments, a concern about possible sources of error, the broader research community s access to other scientists research results, and the sanctioning of practices by an authorizing body. 

The scientific method begins with observation. Observation often demands careful measurement. It also requires the establishment of an operational definition of measurements and other concepts before the experiment begins. 

The experiments that reject a hypothesis should be performed by many different scientists to guard against bias, mistake, misunderstanding, and fraud. Scientific journals use a process of peer review, in which scientists submit their results to a panel of fellow scientists (who may or (8 0) may not know the identity of the writer) for evaluation. Peer review may well have turned up problems and led to a closer examination of experimental evidence for many scientists. Much embarrassment, and wasted effort worldwide, has been avoided by objective peer review, in addition to continuing the use and proving the necessity of the scientific method. 

What typical steps in a scientific method will you use to explore the problem Write down the procedure that you will use in each experiment that you design. Be sure to include all safety precautions. 

Experiments designed to test specific statistical hypotheses comprise the third step of the scientific method of inquiry. They constitute appeals to experience regarding the validity of a specific scientific conjecture. They provide for the collection of data, i.e., numbers that refer to, characterize, or specify the attributes of a study system of interest. 

There are many circumstances in which the only information we can develop on toxic hazards and dose-response relationships derives from experiments on laboratory animals. The example of the food additive, presented in the opening pages, is just one of many circumstances in which condition A involves animal toxicology data, and condition B involves a human population, almost always exposed at small fractions of the dose used in animals, and sometimes exposed for much larger fractions of their lifetime than the animals, and even by different routes. Extrapolations under these circumstances should cause individuals trained in the rigors of the scientific method to seek some form of psychological counsel, or, better yet, to return to the laboratory. 

My story is a peculiar one. It is hard to know what to make of it. The notion of some kind of fantastically complicated visionary revelation that happens to put one at the very center of the action is a symptom of mental illness. This theory does that, and yet so does immediate experience, and so do the ontologies of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. My theory may be clinically pathological, but unlike these religious systems, I have enough humor to realize this. It is important to appreciate the intrinsic comedy of privileged knowledge. It is also important to have recourse to the scientific method whenever appropriate. Most scientific theories can be disproven in the calm confines of the laboratory, evolution to the contrary. 

Cultivation and isolation of bacteria are in some respects more similar to an art than to a scientific method, since there is a strong element of subjectivity involved. Many diverse parameters influence the result of cultivation experiments, including the precise source of the sample (it is probably almost impossible to extract identical samples from nature), the pre-treatment of the sample (storage, cooHng, transport, mixing, sieving, filtering, etc.), the enrichment pro-... 

Is the lysozyme mechanism now proven No. A key feature of the scientific method, as Albert Einstein once summarized it, is No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right a single experiment can prove me wrong. In the case of the lysozyme mechanism,... 

Science deals only with hypotheses that are testable. As such, its domain is restricted to the observable natural world. While scientific methods can be used to debunk various claims, science has no way of verifying testimonies involving the supernatural. The term supernatural literally means above nature. Science works within nature, not above it. Likewise, science is unable to answer such philosophical questions as What is the purpose of life or such religious questions as What is the nature of the human spirit Though these questions are valid and have great importance to us, they rely on subjective personal experience and do not lead to testable hypotheses. 

For those who have wanted to know more, there have always been many ways of refining knowledge. We can roughly identify three major ways the way of direct experience, the way of authority, and the way of reason. Each has its strong and its weak points. A brief examination of each will demonstrate how they are combined to create the scientific method. 

Scientific method The research procedures for conducting a scientific investigation, which involves laboratory or held observations, the development of multiple hypotheses to explain the observations, and the testing of the hypotheses with computers, laboratory measurements and experiments, and/or held research. The inveshgahon may result in none, one, several, or many of the hypotheses being verihed as plausible explanahons. If a hypothesis is repeatedly shown to be a reliable explanahon and can actually make reasonably accurate predichons, it becomes a theory. 

---