EU ENVIRONMENTAL

Environmental risk assessment examines the potential adverse effects to ecosystems from exposure of the aquatic, terrestrial and air components. Initial assessment normally focuses on the aquatic compartment, including effects on microorganisms in waste water treatment plants. This first tier risk assessment can be extended to cover the sediment part of the aquatic compartment and the soil compartment. At higher tonnage levels, effects relevant to the food chain are evaluated, i.e., secondary poisoning. Diderich in Chapter 8 of (73) discusses the principles of EU environmental risk assessment. 

Nonwovens Industry 34, No.9, Sept.2003, p.22-3 EU ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY COULD IMPACT NONWOVENS... 

The European Union (EU) environmental policy has put water protection and its sustainable management high on its agenda, reflected by the European Water Framework Directive (WFD), which is now in its implementation phase. 

Pesendorfer, Dieter (2006) EU environmental policy under pressure chemicals policy change between antagonistic goals Environmental Politics 15 95. 

At the EU level, environmental NGOs were also ambivalent and fragmented in their interest in accession and the diffusion of chemical safety policies, compared to the highly centralised and highly involved position of CEFIC. EU environmental NGOs developed an interest in enlargement relatively late, and for the most part... 

France exhibits the most clear-cut case of REACH catalysing change in a national approach. REACH has forced the government to evaluate the future of its chemical industry. In turn, this has enabled the incorporation of a wider set of actors into chemicals policy debate47. Therefore, although France may be a fence-sitter when it comes to EU environmental policy development (Section 1.6), it has the propensity to leap off the fence and provide a structured response at the national level. 

The Impact of the Pioneers on EU Environmental Policy, European Environmental Policy The Pioneers, Eds., M.S. Andersen and D. Liefferink, Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, 1997, p.l. 

M. Glachant, The Need for Adaptability in EU Environmental Policy Design and Implementation, European Environment, 2001, 11, 5, 239. 

The most well-known legal principle in the field of chemicals policy is the Precautionary Principle it is so well-known that it hardly requires any further introduction here. It was introduced into EU environmental law through the Maastricht Treaty in 1992. The principle s value as a guide for decision making in different policy areas is often questioned, and some analyses of its impact on EU chemicals policy indicate that its influence is not that significant (Heyvaert, 2006), though it can be hard to determine exactly how influential the principle has been for important law cases from the Court of Justice of the European Communities. 

The EU greenhouse gas emission trading scheme constitutes a pathbreaking new chapter in EU environmental law and policy. It is the first continent-wide cap-and-trade scheme that has been put in place and several aspects of the implementation of the scheme created a formidable challenge for authorities at European and national level. Never before has an EU environmental policy created an economic asset whose annual value runs into the tens of billions of Euros and has set up a process of shared tasks among the European and national levels to organise the distribution of these valuable assets to private economic actors. 

Frank Convery, B.Agr.Sc., M.Agr.Sc., M.S., Ph.D., is Heritage Trust Professor of Environmental Policy at University College Dublin. He is active on a number of EU-wide investigations and bodies. He has written extensively on resource and environmental economics issues with particular reference to agriculture, forestry, energy, minerals, land use, urbanisation, environment and development in developing countries. At present, his research relates to EU environmental policy with particular reference to the use, potential and effectiveness of market-based instruments. 

All coimtries have adopted the EU environmental legislation. The manual stations are being rapidly changed to automatic firstly in Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary, then in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovenia and lastly in the Slovak Republic, Romania and Bulgaria. 

CLRTAP and its protocols set a precedent for international environmental policy that the European Community adopted to a large extent. The following sections review the development of EU environmental policy and then highlight the linkages between the two institutions policies and policy development. 

Oberthtir, S. and T. Gehring, 2001 Conceptualizing Interaction between International and EU Environmental Institutions, Ecologic, Berlin. 

Liliana Andonova (Chapter 8) shows how the European Union (EU) approach to sulfur dioxide abatement was successfully applied in eastern and central European countries that were required to comply with EU environmental regulations before applying for membership in the European Union. Early compliance with emissions limits resulted from a severe economic downturn during the transition from a communist to a free market economy, but some countries have been able to control sulfur dioxide levels even as they build a new industrial economy. 

The EU Environmental Liabihty Ehrective [13] came into force in 2004 and member states have three years to implement it into national law. This Directive holds operators whose activities have caused environmental damage financially liable for remedying the damage. It also has a preventative benefit as well in that operators whose activities are deemed to have caused an imminent threat of environmental damage are also liable to take preventative action. 

Since those directives and regulations appeared, the EU seems to lead environmental policies in the world. In many other countries outside the EU, similar laws have been established, obviously affected by the EU laws (directives and regulations). Erom the viewpoint, we can conclude that environmental laws of the EU became global standards of environmental protection policy, even though the US, Japan, and some other countries sometimes opposed parts of their laws. Eigure 4 shows the effect of the EU environmental laws on the global scale schematically. 

In Jime 2001, the EU Committee of the Regions emphasised the need for IPP to be framed on the basis of the fundamental principles imderpinning EU environmental policy. They are ... 

Towards a green economy in Europe EU environmental policy targets and objectives 2010-2050, EEA Report No. 812013, European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, 2013. 

Knill, C. and A. Lenschow, 2005. Compliance, communications and competition patterns of EU environmental policy making and their impact on policy convergence. European Environment 15,114-128. 

---