Errors checking

It is well known that more time is spent correcting programs than actually writing them. The syntax errors are flagged by the compiler and are quickly eliminated. When a program is syntactically correct and linked successfully, it may still contain errors. These are harder to find. If an installation allows the non-standard IMPLICIT NONE feature. 

All variables must be given a value before being used. Some implementations start a program with all variables set to zero. It is dangerous to rely on this, as other installations do not do this. One common trap is to forget the outer boundary which normally remains 

A difficult situation is a new simulation, with unknown results. How can we be sure that the results are correct Often, the simulated system has special cases with known results these should of course be checked. If we are developing a new simulation method it can be checked against 

In electrochemical simulations we are fortunate that, because most programs need not be very complex, we have a good chance of finding all errors, unlike the case of large systems, where a residual error count is accepted as inevitable, and one simply attempts to estimate their probable number (Gilb 1976). 

---

System considers surface water and groundwater pathways of exposure in evaluating the potential for adverse effects. Air and soil pathways will be added as will numerous built-in error checking routines. 

RISKMAN includes extensive error checking and configuration management fin c uality eontn 1. Key module elements and intermediate results are time and date stamped keystrokev of modifications leave an audit trail. 

All the sections must be completed by the user and then submitted to a single administrator for addition to the database. Upon completion of the form, the user has the option of making a check submission, which processes the data and performs error checks as normal, but displays the verdict on screen for the user rather than sending the data to the administrator. A variety of errors are checked, including missing data and inconsistent data, invalid molecular structures or numeric data outside the normal range. When the user is satisfied with the form data, they can be submitted to the administrator via the exporf button. Upon submission, the data are stored... 

The procedure illustrated here, besides containing only trivial technical calculations, lacks important features that are required in production programs. Extensive error checking and recovery must be performed. The procedure must detect the occurrence of a self-referential system of formulas, which would result in attempting endless recursive calls. Access to multiple raw material and formula databases adds power to the program, but must be implemented by complex code to allow flexible control of that access. The structural and input/output statements to support these features may greatly exceed the number of statements that perform modelling calculations. 

Error checking - flagging obvious errors in documents and document transactions, including duplicate documents and unauthorized submissions. 

Live plant measurements will be fed to the model via the plant control computer. The model will then use the measurements and the target minimum gap to predict the alarm trigger point which will be communicated back to the control computer. This control computer is a conventional distributed control system (DCS), which has all the necessary software and displays for alarm handling and recording. The model itself will reside on a separate PC. Communications between the PC and the DCS will be subject to error checking and the system will default to the old fixed alarm value if a fault is detected. 

During the weekly SP TR NRDB building process, all three components undergo a syntax error check and a redundancy check. Entries that are filtered out during the error check or the redundancy check are manually updated and reintegrated in the next weekly SPTR release. In the interest of regular updates, the SPTR production is not delayed... 

Check your answers. Try to finish a little early so that you can read through your answers. Make sure your answers are complete. It is easy to make simple errors. Check for any missing answers to parts of questions, especially multiple-choice questions. Make sure your answers make scientific sense, and in numerical answers check that you have included units and considered significant figures. 

The experimental scheme for a three level reflected saturated fractional design for seven factors is shown in Table 5.15 ( note that one factor was retained as a dummy factor to be used as an additional error check). The experimental order of the scheme was sorted on acid type as this required long equilibration times, this ordering loses some of the features of the initial design but is a compromise that can be justified on the fact that... 

Error checking The complementarity of shape and electrostatic field of subunits constituting the assembly forms the basis for the recognition process. It provides for self-checking and excludes defective subunits thus correcting occasional synthetic errors. 

A highly relevant question is whether the goal should be to operate at the level of the single component or not. In order to minimize the risk of device failure the incorporation of some redundancy or repair procedures appears unavoidable, as in biological processes, so that it will be necessary to develop suitable addressing and detection procedures, error-checking and self-healing mechanisms for multidevice arrays. 

Particularly note that the error check is sizable for this example and not nearly zero as it should be. We will comment on this numerically ill-conditioned problem on p. 398 after we have displayed and discussed the graphics output of this particular call and following the on-screen output of several other similar calls. 

Numerical analysts call such problems ill-conditioned. Monitoring the size of the mass-balance error check will alert the user to ill-conditioned data here. 

Determination of differences in results Sound scientific judgement, well thought out experiments and previous experience with the drug substance or product must be used to determine if an observed difference in degradation rates between samples is due to an actual difference in stability properties or whether the difference is within experimental error. Checking several containers of the same sample under the stress conditions can be used to establish the reproducibility of the observed degradation rate. This would include variability due to the individual samples and the... 

A related observation is that several types of covalent bonds are readily reversible under relatively mild conditions. The importance of this is that, even when certain covalent bonds are formed, other forces may combine to break the bond and send the molecular components back to the pool of available fragments. Such a possibility is essential in any error checking process. Without the ability to undo chemical mistakes any replication process is likely to generate large numbers of errors. The result will be a highly ineffectual method of perpetuating encoded information. 

The dynamic process is akin to the error checking mechanisms employed in protein synthesis each reaction is reversible until the correct product has formed. In any evolutionary chemical system it is important to ensure copying fidelity and the success of dynamic combinatorial libraries indicates that concepts associate with supramolecular chemistry can be valuable in advancing chemical evolution. 

Once the preliminary error checking of the raw data has been done, the control samples should be separated from the normal samples for more detailed examination. This process of separation is greatly aided by the inclusion of the STD SAMP field in the field database (see earlier) and a comprehensive sample list that identifies control samples and their relationships (Fig. 5.3). Control sample results can then be subjected to a number of statistical and plotting procedures that determine the accuracy and precision of results. These processes give an indication of the levels of uncertainty that are associated with the results, information that is essential to interpret the data and present it in a meaningful manner. 

---