Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Device failure

Of these, the most extensive use is to identify adsorbed molecules and molecular intermediates on metal single-crystal surfaces. On these well-defined surfaces, a wealth of information can be gained about adlayers, including the nature of the surface chemical bond, molecular structural determination and geometrical orientation, evidence for surface-site specificity, and lateral (adsorbate-adsorbate) interactions. Adsorption and reaction processes in model studies relevant to heterogeneous catalysis, materials science, electrochemistry, and microelectronics device failure and fabrication have been studied by this technique. [Pg.443]

Different conformity assessment options are available, depending on the type of device and the level of associated risk. For lotv-risk devices, the manufacturer can make a declaration of conformity based solely on self-assessment, without the need for the involvement of a Notified Body. For all other devices Notified Bodies are required to perform one or more of the tasks outlined in Table 10.2. HIV and hepatitis tests and blood grouping tests represent the highest risk devices, as they are critical to ensuring the safety of blood and blood products. For example, a defective HIV test device could result in widespread infection in an unsuspecting population, whereas the detrimental effects ofan AIMD or a Class III device failure will just be confined to the individuals treated by the device. At this end of the risk spectrum. Notified Bodies are required to verify the applied quality system, the specific device design, and the... [Pg.195]

Because prostheses are the most invasive treatment available, they are only considered in patients who do not respond to medications or external devices, or those who have significant adverse effects from other therapies. Patient satisfaction rates can be as high as 80% to 90% with partner satisfaction rates just slightly lower.9 The primary risks of insertion of prostheses are infection and device failure, although these only happen in 2% to 3% and 2% to 14% of patients, respectively. Higher infection rates have been reported in uncontrolled diabetic patients, paraplegics, and patients undergoing reimplantation or penile reconstruction.14,15 Most prostheses can be expected to last from 7 to 10 years.16... [Pg.784]

Of course, later you should see whether the problems correlate somehow. Sometimes a single cause could be creating multiple symptoms. For example, a bad PCB layout may create poor output regulation and also device failures. [Pg.34]

Class 1 medical devices, which include some simple IVDs, are usually exempt from the premarket section 510(k) application process, and their manufacturers are only required to register and list, follow good manufacturing practices, and report device failures. As experience develops with a given medical device it can be reclassified downward from class 3 to class 2 and eventually to class 1. [Pg.110]

Oxygen Entered Nitrogen Header from Back Flow-Preventer Device Failure + NA + ... [Pg.218]

Since caroviologens are rather fragile compounds, they can be protected from the environment by inclusion into polyanionic derivatives of (J-cyclodextrin in a rotaxane fashion 102 [8.156]. Also, in the design of molecular devices, it may be desirable to introduce some extent of redundancy in order to reduce the risk of device failure. This is the case in the tris-carotenoid macrobicycle 103 that represents a sort of triple-threated molecular cable whose crystal structure 104 has been determined. It forms a dinuclear Cu(i) complex 105 in which the bound ions introduce a positive charge at each of the species, a feature of potential interest for transmembrane inclusion [8.157]. [Pg.109]

A highly relevant question is whether the goal should be to operate at the level of the single component or not. In order to minimize the risk of device failure the incorporation of some redundancy or repair procedures appears unavoidable, as in biological processes, so that it will be necessary to develop suitable addressing and detection procedures, error-checking and self-healing mechanisms for multidevice arrays. [Pg.137]

Misprogramming PCA device Failure to clamp or unclamp tubing Improperly loading syringe or cartridge Inability to respond to safety alarms Misplacing PCA pump key... [Pg.245]

Results of clinical investigations involving human subjects, including investigator and enrollment information, protocol information, study population, study period, safety and effectiveness data, adverse reactions and complications, patient discontinuations, patient complaints, device failures and -replacements, data tabulations, subject report forms for deaths and discontinuations, statistical analyses, contraindications, and precautions for use of the device. Studies conducted under an IDE should be identified. [Pg.57]

The author points out statistics that suggest 80 percent of all interlock failures are due to failures of the field device. Those statistics show 45 percent of the interlock failures are measurement device failures and the other 35 percent are caused by valve or valve actuator failures. [27]... [Pg.240]

Danger of device failure there is a concomitant danger with this therapy that the device may for some reason fail to operate, which again requires surgical intervention to correct. [Pg.76]

Thonneau P, Goulard H, Goyaux N. Risk factors for intrauterine device failure a review. Contraception 2001 64(l) 33-7. [Pg.904]

Zerner J, Doil LK, Drewry J, Leeber D. Intrauterine contraceptive device failures in renal transplant patients. J Reprod Med 1981 26 99. [Pg.2830]

The release techniques discussed here do not prevent adhesion from occurring during micromachine operation. Microstructure surfaces may come into contact unintentionally through acceleration or electrostatic forces, or intentionally in applications where surfaces impact or shear against each other. When adhesive attractions exceed restoring forces, surfaces permanently adhere to each other causing device failure—a phenomenon known as in-use stiction. ... [Pg.3053]


See other pages where Device failure is mentioned: [Pg.72]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.2210]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.30 , Pg.42 ]




SEARCH



Device failure rates

Failure electronic devices

Failure, semiconductor device

Heart failure devices

Implantable devices/implantation therapy device failure

The failure of synthetic polymeric medical devices

Wire bond failures, encapsulated device

© 2024 chempedia.info