Stability immobilized enzymes

Cholesterol oxidase Fe304 MNPs Enzyme immobilization, stabilization [180]... 

Fig. 6.4.6 Inactivation of a dehydrogenase from Thermus thermophilus at pH 7 and 83°C. ( ) soluble enzyme ( ) immobilized-stabilized enzyme...

Enzymatic Reactors Adding free enzyme to a batch reactor is practical only when the value of the enzyme is relatively low. With expensive enzymes, reuse by retaining the enzyme with some type of support makes great economic sense. As some activity is usually lost in tethering the enzyme and the additional operations cost money, stabihty is very important. However, many enzymes are stabilized by immobilization thus, many reuses may be possible. 

The immobilization procedure may alter the behavior of the enzyme (compared to its behavior in homogeneous solution). For example, the apparent parameters of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction (optimum temperature or pH, maximum velocity, etc.) may all be changed when an enzyme is immobilized. Improved stability may also accrue from the minimization of enzyme unfolding associated with the immobilization step. Overall, careful engineering of the enzyme microenvironment (on the surface) can be used to greatly enhance the sensor performance. More information on enzyme immobilization schemes can be found in several reviews (7,8). 

The first belief in the possibility of enzyme stabilization on a silica matrix was stated by Dickey in 1955, but he did not give experimental evidence, only mentioning that his experiments were unsuccessful [65]. A sol-gel procedure for enzyme immobilization in silica was first developed by Johnson and Whateley in 1971 [66]. The entrapped trypsin retained about 34 % of its tryptic activity observed in solution before the encapsulation. Furthermore, the enzyme was not released from the silica matrix by washing, demonstrating the increased stability and working pH range. Unfortunately, the article did not attract attention, although their method contained all the details that may be found in the present-day common approach. This was probably due to its publication in a colloid journal that was not read by biochemists. 

Encapsulation via the layer-by-layer assembly of multilayered polyelectrolyte (PE) or PE/nanoparticle nanocomposite thin shells of catalase in bimodal mesoporous silica spheres is also described by Wang and Caruso [198]. The use of a bimodal mesoporous structure allows faster immobilization rates and greater enzyme immobilization capacity (20-40 wt%) in comparison with a monomodal structure. The activity of the encapsulated catalase was retained (70 % after 25 successive batch reactions) and its stability enhanced. 

The first enzyme biosensor was a glucose sensor reported by Clark in 1962 [194], This biosensor measured the product of glucose oxidation by GOD using an electrode which was a remarkable achievement even though the enzyme was not immobilized on the electrode. Updark and Hicks have developed an improved enzyme sensor using enzyme immobilization [194], The sensor combined the membrane-immobilized GOD with an oxygen electrode, and oxygen measurements were carried out before and after the enzyme reaction. Their report showed the importance of biomaterial immobilization to enhance the stability of a biosensor. 

The method of enzyme immobilization constitutes a key factor in the construction of these systems as it is the biocatalytic membrane that largely determines sensitivity, stability and response-time characteristics of the biosensor. 

The recent literature in bioelectrochemical technology, covering primarily the electrochemical aspects of enzyme immobilization and mediation, includes few reports describing engineering aspects of enzymatic biofuel cells or related devices. Current engineering efforts address issues of catalytic rate and stability by seeking improved kinetic and thermodynamic properties in modified enzymes or synthesized enzyme mimics. Equally important is the development of materials and electrode structures that fully maximize the reaction rates of known biocatalysts within a stable environment. Ultimately, the performance of biocatalysts can be assessed only by their implementation in practical devices. 

In vitro enzymatic polymerizations have the potential for processes that are more regio-selective and stereoselective, proceed under more moderate conditions, and are more benign toward the environment than the traditional chemical processes. However, little of this potential has been realized. A major problem is that the reaction rates are slow compared to non-enzymatic processes. Enzymatic polymerizations are limited to moderate temperatures (often no higher than 50-75°C) because enzymes are denaturated and deactivated at higher temperatures. Also, the effective concentrations of enzymes in many systems are low because the enzymes are not soluble. Research efforts to address these factors include enzyme immobilization to increase enzyme stability and activity, solubilization of enzymes by association with a surfactant or covalent bonding with an appropriate compound, and genetic engineering of enzymes to tailor their catalytic activity to specific applications. 

In order to improve the usability of enzymes, immobilization matrices have been proposed with both environmental decontamination as well as personal detoxification in mind. Effective immobilization methods allow for the preparation of an immobilized enzyme that retains most of its native activity, maintains high operational stability as well as high storage stability. Recent advances in material synthesis using enzymes have allowed the preparation of a variety of bioplastics and enzyme-polymer composites, which involve the incorporation of the enzyme material directly into the polymer. Enzymes stabilized in this way maintain considerable stability under normally denaturing conditions [21]. A number of methods have been used to prepare bioplastic or enzyme-polymer composite materials with OP-degrading enzymes. Drevon Russel described the incorporation... 

Immobilization onto a solid support, either by surface attachment or lattice entrapment, is the more widely used approach to overcome enzyme inactivation, particularly interfacial inactivation. The support provides a protective microenvironment which often increases biocatalyst stability, although a decrease in biocata-lytic activity may occur, particularly when immobilization is by covalent bonding. Nevertheless, this approach presents drawbacks, since the complexity (and cost) of the system is increased, and mass transfer resistances and partition effects are enhanced [24]. For those applications where enzyme immobilization is not an option, wrapping up the enzyme with a protective cover has proved promising [21]. 

Adsorption on solid matrices represents a quite simple and inexpensive method for enzyme immobilization. Enzyme dispersion is improved, reducing the diffusion limitations and favoring the accessibility of substrate to the enzyme [12]. On the other hand, because of the weak binding, the system can suffer from catalyst leaching, and there is little stabilization of the enzyme. The most common carriers... 

Stability, duration, sensitivity, interference, and availability of substrates to contact enzymes are the criteria for the success of an enzyme sensor. These criteria depend on sources of enzymes, immobilization techniques, and transducers used. Food matrices are much more complicated than the clinical samples, hence, these criteria become extremely important for the application of the enzyme sensor in food analysis. An extensive list of the response time, detection limits, and stability of biosensors was summarized by Wagner (59). 

Enzyme immobilization has been reported to improve the thermal stability of enzymes (1,2) and may also affect binding of substrates and inhibitors to the enzyme, thereby affecting the Michaelis constant and enzyme inhibition. Several previous studies have considered the advantages of immobilized enzymes with soluble substrates, and a few studies have also investigated the properties of immobilized enzymes with insoluble substrates. The main objective of the present work was to establish the effect of immobilization on the thermal stability of these enzymes, so that they may be used at elevated temperatures without significant activity loss. The immobilization conditions were varied, and their effect on the performance of the immobilized enzymes was analyzed with reference to their physiochemical and structural properties. 

---