Environmental test rooms

Environmental test rooms Environmental test rooms which permit various combinations of temperature, fogging, humidity levels, and shower effects to simulate rain can reproduce in an accelerated mode many of the factors present in an actual exposure. For the most part, these tests use small cut or machined specimens, but assemblies of simulated components and complete systems can also be tested as shown in Fig. 11.35. 

Unlike the other requirements, which only referred to inspection, test, and measuring equipment, this clause adds test facilities. Facilities include the equipment and the area or room in which it is kept or used. Test facilities are any room, area, or complex in which tests are carried out. Inspection, measuring, and test facilities include functional and environmental test laboratories, test and inspection chambers, calibration rooms. 

In Fig. 2.1-1, the general arrangement of an environmental test chamber is shown. Basically, two types of environmental test chambers can be distinguished small scale chambers with volumes ranging from a few litres to a few cubic metres, and room-size large scale chambers of the walk-in type. Both types of chambers have advantages as well as disadvantages (see Table 2.1-1) (EC, 1989). 

Although polyacetylene has served as an excellent prototype for understanding the chemistry and physics of electrical conductivity in organic polymers, its instabiUty in both the neutral and doped forms precludes any useful appHcation. In contrast to poly acetylene, both polyaniline and polypyrrole are significantly more stable as electrical conductors. When addressing polymer stabiUty it is necessary to know the environmental conditions to which it will be exposed these conditions can vary quite widely. For example, many of the electrode appHcations require long-term chemical and electrochemical stabihty at room temperature while the polymer is immersed in electrolyte. Aerospace appHcations, on the other hand, can have quite severe stabiHty restrictions with testing carried out at elevated temperatures and humidities. 

The CDC-NIH document describes, in detail, the different uses of the different classes and types of BSCs and the type of protection (personnel, product, and environmental) each type provides. The document also provides a detailed comparison of filtration (air cleaning), airflow pattern (into the cabinet from the room or from the supply duct), and necessary performance tests (leak, velocity profile, differential pressure, etc.) for each type of BSC (see also Simons ). 

Does the computer room have limited access (e.g., are the servers physically/ logically secure) 2. Are there provisions for power backup 3. Is there a disaster recovery plan and is it periodically tested 4. Is there environmental monitoring 5. Are there off-site back-up facilities for key documents and software Is it readily retrievable ... 

Physiochemical properties of the test material should be a major consideration in selection of drinking water as a dosing matrix. Unlike diet preparation or preparation of gavage dose solutions and suspensions where a variety of solvents and physical processes can be utilized to prepare a dosable form, preparations of drinking water solutions are less flexible. Water solubility of the test chemical is the major governing factor and is dependent on factors such as pH, dissolved salts, and temperature. The animal model itself sets limitations for these factors (acceptability and suitability of pH and salt-adjusted water by the animals as well as animal environmental specifications such as room temperature). 

A small 3 cm x 3.5 cm section of the catalyst-coated desiccant wheel (25 cm diameter) was cut and placed in specially made holder shown in Fig. 12.9-6a. The piece of sample was tested in a 0.2 m3 environmental chamber at Chiaphua Industries Ltd. (Fig. 12.9-6b) for reduction of airborne VOC. The chamber was filled with the target VOCs through two stage saturators shown in Fig. 32b. Once the VOC level in the chamber stabilized, the fan was turned on to circulate the air through the sample. Three sets of sensors were located at the inlet and outlet of the holder, as well as in the center of the chamber. The chamber temperature and relative humidity were kept constant during the test. Figure 12.9-6c shows the results for VOC levels of 4000, 2000 and 1000 ppb at room temperature. The reduction rate was slower because of the low VOC concentration and the poor air circulation in the chamber. Also unlike the Prototype Unit, the catalyst was kept at room temperature throughout the test. 

The environmental impact of the proposed GATS process appears to be minimal. All handling and processing of agent will be conducted indoors in sealed rooms that are vented through HEPA and carbon filters. Liquid and solid waste streams will be relatively small and manageable and will be subjected to hold-test-release procedures. 

There must be an effective separation of rooms to prevent cross-contamination, about which measures shall be taken. Particular care shall be taken when sampling and tests and/or calibrations are undertaken at sites other than a permanent laboratory facility. The technical requirements for accommodation and environmental conditions that can affect the results of tests and calibrations shall be documented. The access to the laboratory shall be restricted to authorised persormel only. If customers or other people visit the laboratories they must be accompanied. The extent of control is based on the parlictrlar circrrmstances. 

Room preparation, environmental room conditions, receipt, transler, identification etc., test system preparation, observations etc.. 

Parts 58.41 through 58.51 cover the physical facihties of the laboratory. The inspector must determine whether or not the facilities are of adequate size and design for completed or in-process studies. The physical parameters and systems of the facilities as they are used to accommodate the various operations employed in the GLP studies are examined. Investigators also deal explicitly with the environmental control and monitoring procedures for critical areas, especially the rooms used for animal housing, the test article storage areas, and the laboratory areas in which biohazardous material is handled. The procedures and methods for cleaning equipment and areas critical to study conduct as well as the cur-... 

If sterility test contaminant is same as routine environmental contaminant the sterility test is voided. Investigate sterility test procedures and room sanitation/sterilization methods to eliminate cause. If media-fill environmental contaminant is same as routine environmental contaminant increase the number of media-fill vials in media hll to determine the product risk potential. Review monitoring technique for possible problem. Review personnel practices, gowning, sanitation, and sterilization. 

Room preparation and environmental room conditions for the test system. 

Other factors like feeding conditions (fed or fasted) should be standardized as well. Usually, animals are fasted over night before they are treated. Feeding conditions as well as environmental factors (temperature in the animal room, humidity in the ambient air) can significantly alter the results of the toxicity testing. 

Additional factors which must be taken into account are environmental effects (thermal as well as chemical), effects of defects, statistical variability of the material, long-term behavior, and cyclic versus static loading effects. Assessment of these effects requires the end user to conduct a large series of tests using multiple specimens. A typical series will examine a unidirectional material in tension in the 0, 90, and cross-ply directions 0, 90, and cross-ply in compression and 1-2, 1-3, and 2-3 shear at different temperatures ranging from —54°C to the expected service temperature creep rupture at temperatures up to the expected service temperature and fatigue at room and elevated temperature. This series of tests, shown in Table 12.1, may require over 400 specimens. 

Calculations are performed to obtain values for the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) and the predicted non-effect environmental concentration (PNEC). Calculations of PEC are based on known release rates and dilution factors in the environment. To estimate PNEC, one divides the LC50 or EC50 for the most sensitive species tested in the laboratory by an arbitrary safety factor (often 1000). This allows room for the great uncertainty in extrapolating from laboratory toxicity data for one species to expected field toxicity for other species. 

---