Effective environmental concentration

Calculations are performed to obtain values for the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) and the predicted non-effect environmental concentration (PNEC). Calculations of PEC are based on known release rates and dilution factors in the environment. To estimate PNEC, one divides the LC50 or EC50 for the most sensitive species tested in the laboratory by an arbitrary safety factor (often 1000). This allows room for the great uncertainty in extrapolating from laboratory toxicity data for one species to expected field toxicity for other species. 

To determine risks to monarch larvae associated widi Bt com pollen, two conponents of greatest significance are 1) the frequency widi which effective environmental concentrations (EEC) exceed the thresholds for mortality or sublethal effects, such as growA inhibition, of each Bt pollen type, and 2) the proportion of monarch larval populations in eastern North America that are exposed to toxic levels of Bt pollen. 

The effects of concentration, velocity and temperature are complex and it will become evident that these factors can frequently outweigh the thermodynamic and kinetic considerations detailed in Section 1.4. Thus it has been demonstrated in Chapter 1 that an increase in hydrogen ion concentration will raise the redox potential of the aqueous solution with a consequent increase in rate. On the other hand, an increase in the rate of the cathodic process may cause a decrease in rate when the metal shows an active/passive transition. However, in complex environmental situations these considerations do not always apply, particularly when the metals are subjected to certain conditions of high velocity and temperature. 

Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH)—The maximum environmental concentration of a contaminant from which one could escape within 30 minutes without any escape-impairing symptoms or irreversible health effects. 

Ecotoxicology deals with the study of the harmful effects of chemicals in ecosystems. This includes harmful effects upon individuals, although the ultimate concern is about how these are translated into changes at the levels of population, commnnity, and ecosystem. Thns, in the conclnding sections of the chapter, emphasis will move from the distribntion and environmental concentrations of pollutants to conseqnent effects at the levels of the individnal, population, community, and ecosystem. The relationship between environmental exposure (dose) and harmful effect (response) is fundamentally important here, and full consideration will be given to the concept of biomarkers, which is based on this relationship and which can provide the means of relating environmental levels of chemicals to consequent effects npon individuals, populations, communities, and ecosystems. 

Thus, [C] X TEE = TEQ i , i , where [C] = environmental concentration of planar polychlorinated compound. The TEQ is an estimate of the concentration of TCDD that would produce the same effect as the given concentration of the dioxin-like chemical. 

Silva, E., Rajapakse, N., and Kortenkamp, A. (2002). Something from nothing — Eight weak estrogenic chemicals combined at concentrations below NOECs produce significant mixture effects. Environmental Science and Technology 36, 1751-1756. 

For the ecological assessment, risk analysis was based on the traditional PEC/ PNEC ratio (Hazard Quotient) where PEC is the predicted environmental concentration (resulting from chemical analysis) and PNEC the predicted no-effect concentration. Ecological assessment for aquatic species was based on rainbow trout or fathead minnow while terrestrial assessment was based on small rodents like mice rats and rabbits. Exposures associated with HQ<1 were considered negligible. 

In conclusion, a reliable assessment of the potential risk of UV filters to the ecosystems is, therefore, not yet possible, due to the scarcity of data on environmental concentrations and to the few species used to identify biological effects. 

Russo, J. and Lagidick, L., Effects of environmental concentrations of atrazine on hemocyte density and phagocytic activity of pond snails Lymnea stagnalis, Environ. Pollut., 127, 303, 2004. 

ENVIRONMENTAL PATHWAY EVALUTION (Evaluations increasingly related to adverse effects—emission, concentration, exposure dose, ecosystem response)... 

The method compares the predicted environmental concentrations (PECs), as indices of exposure, with predicted no effect concentrations (PNECs), as indices of... 

The chlorinated chemicals assessed do not have the same risk profile. For the more volatile chemicals the safety margins between the actual exposure and the level at which no effect on the environment would be expected is quite high. For more persistent chemicals there is a need to look to the environmental compartment where they can be accumulated (mainly in sediments and biota). For some of these chemicals the safety margin is quite low and in worst-case situations serious effects may occur. For the very persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic chemicals (like dioxins, PCBs and DDT), acceptable environmental concentrations are so low and difficult to control that the industry is committed to reducing as far as possible releases to the environment through application of Best Available Techniques (BAT), mainly with respect to dioxins. For other chemicals (PCBs, DDT), production has already been halted for some years. 

The assessment of whether a substance presents a risk to the receiving environmental compartment is based on a comparison of the measured or predicted environmental concentration (PEC) of the chemical of concern with the predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) to organisms in the ecosystem. This is briefly discussed in Chapter 7.4. Studies carried out so far, e.g. by Vandepitte and Feijtel [91], show that the risk of anionic surfactants such as LAS, AE and AES for the aquatic environment is low, since the PECs are always lower than the maximum permissible concentrations. 

Canada [8]. In this document all three approaches have been performed after an extensive literature study of effects documented and environmental concentrations measured in the Canadian aquatic environment. Thus, based on the most sensitive endpoint found in the literature (LC50 of nonylphenol (NP) for winter flounder 17 pig L-1 [9]), and applying an uncertainty factor of 100, for NP a PNEC of 0.17 p.g L-1 was derived. Analogously, NEC were derived for nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEO) and nonylphenol ethoxy carboxylates (NPEC) these are listed in Table 7.4.1. 

---