Environmental safe levels

Abbasi, S.A. and R. Soni. 1986. An examination of environmentally safe levels of zinc (II), cadmium (II) and lead (II) with reference to impact on channelfish Nuria denricus. Environ. Pollut. 40A 37-51. 

The conventional approach to controlling releases of hazardous substances involves establishing safe levels for specific substances that allow environmental quality objectives and associated standards to be set and licence conditions or fixed emission limits to be determined. Environmental safe levels take account of the toxicity of the substance, its persistence and ability to bioaccumulate, and in some cases can include mutagenicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive impairment. Whitehouse and Cartwright (1998) discuss the need for environmental standards and identify the following purposes ... 

Personnel are protected in working with tritium primarily by containment of all active material. Containment devices such as process lines and storage media are normally placed in well-ventilated secondary enclosures (hoods or process rooms). The ventilating air is monitored and released through tall stacks environmental tritium is limited to safe levels by atmospheric dilution of the stack effluent. Tritium can be efficiently removed from air streams by catalytic oxidation followed by water adsorption on a microporous soHd absorbent (80) (see Absorption). 

PBPK models improve the pharmacokinetic extrapolations used in risk assessments that identify the maximal (i.e., the safe) levels for human exposure to chemical substances (Andersen and Krishnan 1994). PBPK models provide a scientifically sound means to predict the target tissue dose of chemicals in humans who are exposed to environmental levels (for example, levels that might occur at hazardous waste sites) based on the results of studies where doses were higher or were administered in different species. Figure 3-4 shows a conceptualized representation of a PBPK model. 

The BASIC toxicity database contains information on the aquatic toxicity of a number of hazardous substances. In many cases, the information is given as some sort of safe level such as UK Environmental Quality Standards (EQSs) or the national/international equivalent. For substances for which no such levels have been set, a brief literature review was performed in order to produce an environmental hazard/risk assessment. 

The worst hazard scenarios (excessive temperature and pressure rise accompanied by emission of toxic substances) must be worked out based upon calorimetric measurements (e.g. means to reduce hazards by using the inherent safety concept or Differential Scanning Calorimetry, DSC) and protection measures must be considered. If handling hazardous materials is considered too risky, procedures for generation of the hazardous reactants in situ in the reactor might be developed. Micro-reactor technology could also be an option. Completeness of the data on flammability, explosivity, (auto)ignition, static electricity, safe levels of exposure, environmental protection, transportation, etc. must be checked. Incompatibility of materials to be treated in a plant must be determined. 

Hrudey, S. and Krewski, D. (1995) Is there a safe level of exposure to a carcinogen Environmental Science and Technology. 29, 370A. 

Hydrogen energy is a promising alternative solution because it is clean and environmentally safe. It also produces negligible levels of greenhouse gases and other pollutants when compared with the fossil fuel energy sources they replace. 

This Directive (amended in 2008) stimulates a more intensive utilization of organic waste, the diversion from landfill, separate collection of organic waste and treatment in a way that fulfils a high level of environmental protection. It supports the use of environmentally safe materials produced from organic waste. The Member States were requested to amend their national waste laws within 2 years of its coming into force. 

Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction (SCDE) is an ex sitn process for the treatment of low-level solid mixed and land disposal restricted (LDR) wastes. SCDE can extract hazardons solvents from waste snbstrates to prodnce land-disposable, low-level wastes. The process employs the snpercritical finid carbon dioxide as a solvent. This finid is noncombustible, nontoxic, and environmentally safe. In its supercritical state, carbon dioxide can dissolve organic contaminants allowing the fluid to quickly penetrate and facilitate transfer out of a contaminated matrix. 

Some possible toxicological effects such as endocrine disruption continue to be uncertain, particularly for DDT, DDE, dieldrin and dioxin exposures. The history of environmental health shows that safe levels are uncertain and vary as knowledge improves. The long-term trend is often towards lower levels as uncertainties decrease. This should be considered when accounting for the public benefits of further reducing POPs residues and wastes in the Australian environment. 

According to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District in San Francisco, more than 5.5 million pounds of toxic chlorinated substances are released in the area annually. This includes approximately 13,000 pounds of chloroform, 1.4 million pounds of freon, 2 million pounds of perchloromethylene, and trace amounts of dioxin. (Dioxin is one of the most toxic chemicals known.) A report released in September 1994 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) clearly describes dioxin as a serious public health threat. The public health impact of dioxin may rival the impact that DDT had on public health in the 1960s. According to the EPA report, not only does there appear to be no safe level of exposure to dioxin, but levels of dioxin and similar chemicals have been found in the U.S. population that are at or near levels associated with adverse health effects. The EPA report also confirmed that dioxin is a cancer hazard, exposure... 

---