Environmental policies/protection regulations

There has been a gradual move in environmental policy and regulation from hazard-based to risk-based approaches. This is partly due to the recognition that for many environmental issues a level of zero risk is unobtainable or simply not necessary for human and environmental protection and that a certain level of risk in a given scenario is deemed acceptable after considering the benefits. 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 401 M Street SW, Washington DC 20460, (202) 260-4355. Administers federal environmental policies, establishes regulations, sponsors and conducts research, enforces regulations, and provides information on environmental subjects. Numerous branches based on type of environment, i.e., air, radiation, disposal, water, etc. Ten regional offices. On-line access points for database retrieval. Hazardous Waste and Cleanup Information Hotline same address, (800) 424-9346. 

DPLR/SEPA (Department of Policies, Laws and Regulations of the State Environmental Protection Administration of China). 1997. Compilation of Environmental laws and Regulations in China 1982-1997. Chemical industry Publishing House, Beijing. 

In analyzing the subjective data, the researchers compared the responses by the officials of the different companies in the sample to detect consistencies and/or differences. This comparison was made to differentiate between responses that were unique and those that appeared representative of the sample as a whole. The attitudes, philosophies, and predictions of the upper-level R D officials interviewed in this study will, in large part, determine the future R D policies and plans of these companies and, therefore, are highly significant in accessing the impact of environmental protection regulation and its future ramifications. 

The effect of anthropogenic activity relating to industrial and economic development has had a significant impact on the environment. In recent decades, public awareness of environmental pollution has increased markedly, and the introduction of guidelines and legislation for the protection of water, air and soil quality -of major importance in the political arena - is imminent. As an integral component of environmental policy, it has become essential to regulate and monitor toxic substances. 

Regulatory issues covering environmental policies and procedures, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations to do with hot work, lockout/tagout, confined space entry and hearing protection, and HAZWOPER and HAZCOM requirements. 

Since those directives and regulations appeared, the EU seems to lead environmental policies in the world. In many other countries outside the EU, similar laws have been established, obviously affected by the EU laws (directives and regulations). Erom the viewpoint, we can conclude that environmental laws of the EU became global standards of environmental protection policy, even though the US, Japan, and some other countries sometimes opposed parts of their laws. Eigure 4 shows the effect of the EU environmental laws on the global scale schematically. 

Abstract This chapter introduces the European Union (EU) and discusses some of its directives and regulations. Today the EU has some of the most progressive environmental policies in the world that extend to all areas of environmental protection. Some of these areas are air pollution control, water protection, waste management, and the control of chemicals. This chapter includes information about the End of Life Vehicles Directive (ELV), the Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS), and the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (WEEE). The EU regulation called Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) is described too. 

Carolyn Raffensperger Joel Tickner, Protecting Public Health and the Environment (1999) David Driesen, The Societal Cost of Environmental Regulation Beyond Administrative Cost-Benefit Analysis, 24 Ecol. L. Q. 545 (1997) Wendy E. Wagner, Innovations in Environmental Policy The Triumph of Technology-Based Standards, 2000 U. 111. L. Rev. 1553 (2000). 

All toxic materials were disposed of in accordance with the policy of UTMDACC to handle and dispose of hazardous waste, which is in accordance with the regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Federal Department of Transportation, Texas Department of Health, and the Texas Water Commission. 

---