Employee Responsibility

Feature 12. Develop and implement strategies for regular, ongoing security-related communications with employees, response organizations, rate-setting organizations, and customers. 

The least tangible of the economic factors that might be considered in evaluating pollution prevention projects are gronped into the third tier of costs. Consumer responses to improved product quality or improved corporate image, employee responses to improved environmental stewardship, and potential improvements in worker health and safety due to pollution prevention could all be considered. Such factors are even more difficult to quantitatively evalnate than tier 1 and tier 2 costs. 

Responsibility Each SOP is supported with responsibility, describing the department and the employee responsible for implementing the procedure. 

Bitner, M.J. (1990) Evaluating service encounters The effect of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing 54,69-82. 

Fire and life safety education of fire brigades, employees, responsible parties, and the general public... 

Visitors will have a designated host employee responsible for their safety whenever possible. 

The owner of the website assigns an employee responsibility for the site and his or her name is shown on the main page. 

In 1988, more than half of approximately 200 employees working with composite plastic materials in one building of an aircraft manufacturing company reported CNS, respiratory, heart, and gastrointestinal symptoms. The employee response was dubbed aerospace syndrome. Sampling of the air in that building showed the presence of phenol (1.46), formaldehyde (0.35), styrene (2.95), methylene chloride (1.25), methanol (0.77), C9-C12 alkanes and aromatics (3.0-4.0), particulates, and epoxy resins, all at concentrations well below their TLVsJ51 The author of the study concluded that, like the employees exposed to irradiated mail, the aerospace workers responded to psychosocial factors in the workplace. 

Best-seller covering chemical hazard evaluation, warning labels, MSDSs, written hazard communication plans, workplace-specific training, and employer/employee responsibilities. 

Bitner, M. J. (1990), Evaluating Service Encounters The Effects of Physical Surroundings and Employee Responses, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, January, pp. 71—84. 

Upgrade training of employees responsible for these systems... 

Create systems of accountability to hold leaders and employees responsible for practicing inclusion provide support and incentives for best practices. Bell 8c Nkomo, 2001 Hannum, McFeeters, 8c Booysen, 2010... 

O Leary, B., Weathington, B. (2006). Beyond the business case for diversity in organizations. Employee Responsibilities Rights Journal, 18 A), 283-292. 

Rowe, M. P. (1990). Barriers to equahty The power of subde discrimination to maintain unequal opportunity. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3(2), 153-163. 

Snyder, L. A., Carmichael, J. S., Blackwell, L. V., Cleveland, J. N., Thornton, G. C. Ill (2010). Perceptions of discrimination and justice among employees with disabilities. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 22, 5-19. 

Flanagan (1954) developed the procedure known as the critical incident technique. This relatively simple process involves interviewing job incumbents and asking for descriptions of critical incidents in their job, and also asking what they did in the particular simation. Critical incident information could also be obtained by supervisors keeping a record of simations they have observed, and employees responses to the simation. Thus, a critical incident represents a specific job simation and a particularly effective response to that simation. The critical incident technique can easily be applied to gather safety-specific examples. A sample of employees would be asked to describe a simation which had a safety aspect and then to describe how the safety issue was handled or resolved. Of course it is necessary to ensure that the response to the simation is indeed the correct response in that it is what the organization would want an employee to do when the particular safety simation occurred. Once a number of these critical incidents have been identified, they can be formed into employment interview questions. The job applicant is presented with the question (or scenario) and is assessed on their description of how they would (or have) handle or responded to the simation, and in particular how... 

The expected familiarization by co-workers scale has 4 items, and both versions are shown in Table 9.1. At this time, the scale has not been used in published research. Unpublished analysis of 144 new employee responses produced a Cronbach s alpha of 0.77. 

Although OSH A does not cite employees for violations of their responsibilities, each employee shall comply with all occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued under the Act that are applicable. Employee responsibilities and rights in states with their own occupational safety and health programs are generally the same as for workers in states covered by Federal OSHA. An employee should do the following ... 

The three process employees responsible for safety and environmental compliance... 

List five employee responsibilities under OSHA. 

Assure employees are familiar with the company s security plan and properly trained in its implementation. Training should include company secmity objectives, specific security procedures, employee responsibilities, and organizational security structure. 

The security plan must be reviewed at least annually and revised and/or updated as necessary to reflect changes in circumstances. When the plan is updated or revised, all employees responsible for implementing it must be notified and all copies of the plan must be maintained as of the date of the most recent revision. 

Motor carrier A for-hire motor carrier or a private motor carrier. The term includes a motor carrier s agents, officers, and representatives as well as employees responsible for hiring, supervising, training, assigning, or dispatching of drivers and employees concerned with the installation, inspection, and maintenance of motor vehicle equipment and/or accessories. 

Another way to cut down on words is to use pictorials, and utihze full-color imagery on your identification products. Something as simple as a no-smoking symbol on a sign or a full-color image of an employee responsible for lockout/tagout on a tag can make a big difference. 

Mentally holding back and consciously not providing answers, solutions, or telling subordinates what to do and not taking over employees responsibilities but rather shifting them back to employees and holding them accountable... 

---