Corporate image

Tier 3 Less tangible costs, such as consumer response and confidence, employee relations, corporate image, etc. 

The least tangible of the economic factors that might be considered in evaluating pollution prevention projects are gronped into the third tier of costs. Consumer responses to improved product quality or improved corporate image, employee responses to improved environmental stewardship, and potential improvements in worker health and safety due to pollution prevention could all be considered. Such factors are even more difficult to quantitatively evalnate than tier 1 and tier 2 costs. 

Shuichi Maeda Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Imaging Materials Laboratory, 1000 Kamoshi-dacho Aobaku Yokohamashi Japan... 

On large and important projects, where risks could have substantial financial impact or, even worse, affect the corporate image, risk analysis must be taken very seriously and approached in a very deliberate and... 

Improved corporate image among students and faculty. 

Principe, in his opening essay to this volume, suggests something similar to my speculation when he notes that the denigration of alchemy was particularly strong in the French and British national scientific societies concerned about their corporate image, and thus the status of chemistry and chemists. ... 

Included in the inventory of costs, savings, and revenues are comphance training, testing, UabUity, and product and corporate image. 

---