Electronic structure techniques

The LSDA approach requires simultaneous self-consistent solutions of the Schrbdinger and Poisson equations. This was accomplished using the Layer Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker technique which has many useful features for calculations of properties of layered systems. It is, for example, one of only a few electronic structure techniques that can treat non-periodic infinite systems. It also has the virtue that the computational time required for a calculation scales linearly with the number of different layers, not as the third power as most other techniques. 

Potential energy surface for a chemical reaction can be obtained using electronic structure techniques or by solving Schrodinger equation within Born-Oppenheimer approximation. For each geometry, there is a PE value of the system. 

Mechanistic Studies of Electron Exchange Kinetics Using Ab Initio Electronic Structure Techniques... 

Electronic structure methods for studies of nanostructures can be divided broadly into supercell methods and real-space methods. Supercell methods use standard k-space electronic structure techniques separating periodically repeated nanostructures by distances large enough to neglect their interactions. Direct space methods do not need to use periodic boundary conditions. Various electronic structure methods are developed and applied using both approaches. In this section we will shortly discuss few popular but powerful electronic structure methods the pseudopotential method, linear muffin-tin orbital and related methods, and tight-binding methods. 

Although the goal here is the extension of molecular electronic structure techniques into the realm of heavy elements, it is important that as much as possible of the reliability of light-element work be retained. The accuracy of the effective potential approximation can most readily be determined by careful comparisons of molecular EP results with those obtained from allelectron calculations. At the present time this can be done easily only for the nonrelativistic case. Although comparisons can be made with experimentally determined properties, it should be kept in mind that in general highly accurate valence wave functions are required. 

Electronic structure and interatomic potential methods. There is no inherent superiority of electronic structure techniques. They do, of course, provide information that is inaccessible to interatomic potential methods, but they cannot explore systems of the size or timescales that are frequently needed. IP techniques provide accurate information on structure and transport properties and are often the appropriate technique, even when electronic structure methods are applicable. The simple and obvious guideline is that the appropriate technique is used for the particular problem at hand. 

Massively parallel (multiple instruction, multiple data) computers with tens or hundreds of processors are not readily accessible to the majority of quantum chemists at the present time. However the cost of currently available hypercube machines with tens of processors (each with about the power of a VAX) is comparable to that of superminis but with up to a hundred times the power. For applications of the type discussed above the performance of a machine with as few as 32 or 64 processors would be comparable to (or perhaps even exceed) that of a single processor supercomputer. Although computer requirements currently limit QMC applications (even with effective potentials) the proliferation of inexpensive massively parallel machines could conceivably make the application of relativistic effective potentials with C C quite competitive with more conventional electronic structure techniques. 

Ten years ago when I attended a Faraday Discussion on Solid State Chemistry New Opportunities from Computer Simulations, interatomic potential methods were well developed and the use of ab initio methods starting to become widespread. In his Introductory Lecture Prof. C. R. A. Catlow asked With the continuing growth of the applicability of electronic structure techniques, can we see them as replacing interatomic potential based methods His reply then was there will be a continuing role for interatomic based potential based methods as the field moves to more complex systems. Over the last decade, ab initio electronic structure methods have progressed rapidly and for many applications plane-wave ab initio methods are now the first choice for calculations. Nevertheless that reply still holds true. 

As a final example, we summarize some results of a recent ambitious attempt to provide a comprehensive mechanistic account of long-range FT in a complex molecular solute in aqueous solution by exploiting molecular dynamics and electronic-structure techniques [36]. 

As we have noted, electronic structure techniques attempt to solve the Schrodinger equation. The traditional approach in quantum chemistry has been to use the Hartree Fock (HF) approximation, in which a determinantal, antisymmetrized wave function is optimized in accordance with the variational principle. The wave function is normally written as an expansion of atomic orbitals (the LCAO approximation). A major weakness of the HF method is that in its single... 

To gain an insight into the structure and electronic properties of the materials, calculations have been performed using electronic structure techniques. In particular, the electronic structure of the cation is addressed using a molecular cluster approach, whilst the one-electron spectra and magnetic ordering for... 

Vertical Ionization Potentials (VIPs) of small molecules can be accurately computed by a variety of ab initio electronic structure techniques [1-7]. For relatively larger molecules, Density Functional Theory (DFT) possesses a major advantage over more conventional techniques due to its computational expedience and reliability. 

Although a wide variety of theoretical methods is available to study weak noncovalent interactions such as hydrogen bonding or dispersion forces between molecules (and/or atoms), this chapter focuses on size consistent electronic structure techniques likely to be employed by researchers new to the field of computational chemistry. Not stuprisingly, the list of popular electronic structure techniques includes the self-consistent field (SCF) Hartree-Fock method as well as popular implementations of density functional theory (DFT). However, correlated wave function theory (WFT) methods are often required to obtain accmate structures and energetics for weakly bound clusters, and the most useful of these WFT techniques tend to be based on many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) (specifically, Moller-Plesset perturbation theory), quadratic configuration interaction (QCI) theory, and coupled-cluster (CC) theory. 

Energy is an extensive property. This fundamental thermodynamic principle is introduced early in most general chemistry textbooks, and it provides the foundation for the supermolecule description of intermolecular interactions. Unfortunately, not all electronic structure techniques are size con-sistent (or more generally size extensive ). That is, the energy computed by some methods does not scale properly with the number of noninteracting fragments. Readers interested in more detail may be interested in the sections discussing size consistency and extensivity in the review of coupled-cluster theory by Crawford and Schaefer. ... 

Figure 4 Example of convergent quantum chemistry scheme that employs AO basis sets that systematically approach the 1-particle or complete basis set (CBS) limit along with correlated electronic structure techniques that systematically approach the n-particle or full configuration interaction (FCI) limit.

In general, second-order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (a specific case of second-order many-body perturbation theory) is the workhorse of electronic structure techniques for weakly bound systems because the method tends to provide a reliable description of a wide range of weak interactions. For most hydrogen-bonding scenarios, MP2 energetics are extremely accurate and nearly identical to those from CCSD(T) computations with the same basis set. In fact, a recent study revealed that MP2 interaction energies obtained with an appropriate triple- basis set agree favorably with CCSD(T) CBS... 

While the continuous body description of the metal is exploited, the molecule is treated atomistically by standard electronic structure techniques, such as time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TD-HF) or time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) (see Sec. 4.4.2), and the electromagnetic interaction is included in the molecular Hamiltonian. This is a promising route not only to bypass inaccuracies related to the classical dipole model for the molecule, but also to go toward an ab initio molecular plasmonics. At present, this model has been explored mostly in the polarizable continuum model (PCM) group [51, 52, 54-58], but recently other implementations have been proposed [59]. 

---