Pseudopotential method

Figure Al.3.16. Reflectivity of silicon. The theoretical curve is from an empirical pseudopotential method calculation [25], The experimental curve is from [31],...

It is possible to identify particular spectral features in the modulated reflectivity spectra to band structure features. For example, in a direct band gap the joint density of states must resemble that of critical point. One of the first applications of the empirical pseudopotential method was to calculate reflectivity spectra for a given energy band. Differences between the calculated and measured reflectivity spectra could be assigned to errors in the energy band... 

Figure B3.2.1. The band structure of hexagonal GaN, calculated using EHT-TB parameters detemiined by a genetic algorithm [23]. The target energies are indicated by crosses. The target band structure has been calculated with an ab initio pseudopotential method using a quasiparticle approach to include many-particle corrections [194].

W. Pickett. Pseudopotential methods in condensed matter applications. Corn-put Phys Rep 9 115, 1989. 

It is clear that the one-to-one correspondence assumption readily breaks down, notoriously at the position halfway along the path, the saddle point position. This is considered as the most important point apart from the initial position [20, 21], because conventionally the force has been calculated by averaging its values at initial position and saddle point. Until now only the model-pseudopotential method was used, which... 

The systems discussed in this chapter give some examples using different theoretical models for the interpretation of, primarily, UPS valence band data, both for pristine and doped systems as well as for the initial stages of interface formation between metals and conjugated systems. Among the various methods used in the examples are the following semiempirical Hartree-Fock methods such as the Modified Neglect of Diatomic Overlap (MNDO) [31, 32) and Austin Model 1 (AMI) [33] the non-empirical Valence Effective Hamiltonian (VEH) pseudopotential method [3, 34J and ab initio Hartree-Fock techniques. 

Prostaglandins 624, 725, 960 Prostanoids 620 Protonation 565-567, 1049 photochemical 882 Pseudopotential methods 15, 16 Pummerer rearrangement 240, 243, 470, 843 Pyramidal inversion 602, 604 Pyrazolenines 749 Pyridazine oxides 640 Pyridine aldehydes, synthesis of 310 Pyridine oxides 640 Pyrolysis 102-105 of sulphones 110, 679-682, 962 of sulphoxides 739, 740 Pyrroles 265, 744... 

Pickett, WE. (1989) Pseudopotential Methods in Condensed Matter Applications. Physics Reports-Review Section of Physics Letters, 9, 115-198. 

Naveh, D., Kronik, L., Tiago, M.L. and Chelikowsky J.R. (2007) Real-space pseudopotential method for spin-orbit coupling within density functional theory. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter, 76, 153407-1-153407-4. 

The empirical approach [7] was by far the most fruitful first attempt. The idea was to fit a few Fourier coefficients or form factors of the potential. This approach assumed that the pseudopotential could be represented accurately with around three Fourier form factors for each element and that the potential contained both the electron-core and electron-electron interactions. The form factors were generally fit to optical properties. This approach, called the Empirical Pseudopotential Method (EPM), gave [7] extremely accurate energy band structures and wave functions, and applications were made to a large number of solids, especially semiconductors. [8] In fact, it is probably fair to say that the electronic band structure problem and optical properties in the visible and UV for the standard semiconductors was solved in the 1960s and 1970s by the EPM. Before the EPM, even the electronic structure of Si, which was and is the prototype semiconductor, was only partially known. 

The local density approximation (LDA) and GGA within a plane-wave pseudopotential method was used in Ishibashi and Kohyama (2000) while DFT within the linearized augmented plane wave (LAPW) approach was employed in Sing et al. (2003b). 

Incidentally, let us mention that the essence of the pseudopotential methods [52] is to replace core electrons by an appropriate operator. The point is that the core-valence partitioning involved in these methods refers to the same orbital space as the corresponding all-electron calculations. 

The generalization of the pseudopotential method to molecules was done by Boni-facic and Huzinaga[3] and by Goddard, Melius and Kahn[4] some ten years after Phillips and Kleinman s original proposal. In the molecular pseudopotential or Effective Core Potential (ECP) method all core-valence interactions are approximated with l dependent projection operators, and a totally symmetric screening type potential. The new operators, which are parametrized such that the ECP operator should reproduce atomic all electron results, are added to the Hamiltonian and the one electron ECP equations axe obtained variationally in the same way as the usual Hartree Fock equations. Since the total energy is calculated with respect to this approximative Hamiltonian the separability problem becomes obsolete. 

Of the three models that have been proposed to explain the properties of excess electrons in liquid helium, two are considered in detail (1) The electron is localized in a cavity in the liquid (2) The electron is a quasi-free particle. The pseudopotential method is helpful in studying both of these models. The most useful treatment of electron binding in polar solvents is based on a model with the solution as a continuous dielectric medium in which the additional electron induces a polarization field. This model can be used for studies with the hydrated electron. 

The pseudopotential method is extremely useful for studying both the free and localized states of excess electrons in liquids. In the case of the free electron states, a plane wave pseudowave function can be used. This formalism is also found to be extremely useful in studying localized electron states in simple liquids (—e.g., liquid helium). A direct solution to this problem in the SCF scheme is obviously impossible at present while the pseudopotential method makes the problem tractable. 

The calculations were carried out by the pseudopotential method with SBK basis set (GAMESS codes [19,20]) see Refs. [4,5] for the details of calculations. aThe data for the 4-spin cluster [5] are shown for comparison. 

The basic idea behind the pseudopotential method is to treat the valence electron as moving in a potential from a fixed ion core. Chemically this is very reasonable and it is only if one is interested in very accurate investigation of spectroscopic data of elements with highly polarizable cores (typically alkali metals) that this approach fails7. 

However, this is definitely the technique for future calculations involving a large number of metal atoms. Furthermore, the idea behind the pseudopotential method is also applied in other types of Hamiltonians described below, e.g., valence effective Hamiltonian and semi-empirical methods. 

---