Electron transfer factors

It is hard to see how the authors can reconcile such different exigencies. As regards the steric factors the third condition renders meaningless the condition of resemblance to steroids. The steroids and the purine-pyrimidine pairs are too different from each other to serve simultaneously as a standard for geometrical analogies. As to the electron transfer factors, we have shown in a series of publications that they are unrelated to the presence or absence of carcinogenic activity in aromatic hydrocarbons.27 >81 24... 

Ferredoxins, A group of electron transfer factors found in plants and bacteria, which are non-heme iron sulfur proteins and which play an important role in photosynthesis, nitrogen and carbon dioxide fixation, and respiration. They are generally classified by the presence of either 2 or 4 iron atom clusters and an equivalent amount of inor-... 

This lineshape analysis also implies tliat electron-transfer rates should be vibrational-state dependent, which has been observed experimentally [44]- Spin-orbit relaxation has also been identified as an important factor in controlling tire identity of botli electron and vibrational-state distributions in radiationless ET reactions. 

The equation does not take into account such pertubation factors as steric effects, solvent effects, and ion-pair formation. These factors, however, may be neglected when experiments are carried out in the same solvent at the same temperature and concentration for an homogeneous set of substrates. So, for a given ambident nucleophile the rate ratio kj/kj will depend on A and B, which vary with (a) the attacked electrophilic center, (b) the solvent, and (c) the counterpart cationic species of the anion. The important point in this kind of study is to change only one parameter at a time. This simple rule has not always been followed, and little systematic work has been done in this field (12) stiH widely open after the discovery of the role played by single electron transfer mechanism in ambident reactivity (1689). 

Influence of the Kinetics of Electron Transfer on the Faradaic Current The rate of mass transport is one factor influencing the current in a voltammetric experiment. The ease with which electrons are transferred between the electrode and the reactants and products in solution also affects the current. When electron transfer kinetics are fast, the redox reaction is at equilibrium, and the concentrations of reactants and products at the electrode are those specified by the Nernst equation. Such systems are considered electrochemically reversible. In other systems, when electron transfer kinetics are sufficiently slow, the concentration of reactants and products at the electrode surface, and thus the current, differ from that predicted by the Nernst equation. In this case the system is electrochemically irreversible. 

In Section 1.4 it was assumed that the rate equation for the h.e.r. involved a parameter, namely the transfer coefficient a, which was taken as approximately 0-5. However, in the previous consideration of the rate of a simple one-step electron-transfer process the concept of the symmetry factor /3 was introduced, and was used in place of a, and it was assumed that the energy barrier was almost symmetrical and that /3 0-5. Since this may lead to some confusion, an attempt will be made to clarify the situation, although an adequate treatment of this complex aspect of electrode kinetics is clearly impossible in a book of this nature and the reader is recommended to study the comprehensive work by Bockris and Reddy. ... 

Whether the second step does take place depends on a number of factors. The electron affinity of the M ion must be sufficiently great, and this point can be appreciated by considering a few examples. Electron transfer to stilbene or tetraphenyl ethylene leads to the formation of negative ions which in turn rapidly ac-... 

Nuclear, electronic and frequency factors in electron transfer reactions. N. Sutin, Acc. Chem. Res., 1982,15, 275-282 (78). 

A third factor to be considered in this triangular competition (internal deactivation, back electron transfer, chemical reaction) is the possibility of an unfavored chemical reaction followed by the initiation of a long chain39,40. 

The principles outlined above are, of course, important in electro-synthetic reactions. The pH of the electrolysis medium, however, also affects the occurrence and rate of proton transfers which follow the primary electron transfer and hence determine the stability of electrode intermediates to chemical reactions of further oxidation or reduction. These factors are well illustrated by the reduction at a mercury cathode of aryl alkyl ketones (Zuman et al., 1968). In acidic solution the ketone is protonated and reduces readily to a radical which may be reduced further only at more negative potentials. 

Before considering the role of the electrode material in detail, there is one further factor which should be pointed out. The product of an electrode process may be dependent on the timescale of the contact between the electroactive species and the electrode surface, particularly when a chemical reaction is sandwiched between two electron transfers in the overall process. This was first realized when it was found that ir E curves and reaction products at a dropping mercury electrode were not always the same as those at a mercury pool electrode (Zuman, 1967a). For example, the reduction of p-diacetylbenzene at a mercury pool was found to be a four-electron process, giving rise to the dialcohol, while at a dropping mercury electrode the product was formed by a two-electron process where only one keto group was reduced (Kargin et al., 1966). These facts were interpreted in terms of the mechanism... 

In many cases, the values of A n and k2i may be directly or indirectly determined. We shall say no more about this relationship here, other than to indicate that it proves to be generally applicable, and is sufficiently accepted that the Marcus-Hush equation is now used to establish when an outer-sphere pathway is operative. In the context of this chapter, the involvement of the Kn term is interesting for it relates to the relative stabilization of various oxidation states by particular ligand sets. The factors which stabilize or destabilize particular oxidation states continue to play their roles in determining the value of Kn, and hence the rate of the electron transfer reaction. 

EPR studies on electron transfer systems where neighboring centers are coupled by spin-spin interactions can yield useful data for analyzing the electron transfer kinetics. In the framework of the Condon approximation, the electron transfer rate constant predicted by electron transfer theories can be expressed as the product of an electronic factor Tab by a nuclear factor that depends explicitly on temperature (258). On the one hand, since iron-sulfur clusters are spatially extended redox centers, the electronic factor strongly depends on how the various sites of the cluster are affected by the variation in the electronic structure between the oxidized and reduced forms. Theoret-... 

As the cation becomes progressively more reluctant to be reduced than [53 ], covalent bond formation is observed instead of electron transfer. Further stabilization of the cation causes formation of an ionic bond, i.e. salt formation. Thus, the course of the reaction is controlled by the electron affinity of the carbocation. However, the change from single-electron transfer to salt formation is not straightforward. As has been discussed in previous sections, steric effects are another important factor in controlling the formation of hydrocarbon salts. The significant difference in the reduction potential at which a covalent bond is switched to an ionic one -around -0.8 V for tropylium ion series and —1.6 V in the case of l-aryl-2,3-dicyclopropylcyclopropenylium ion series - may be attributed to steric factors. 

Factors that enhance tunnelling are a small particle mass and a narrow potential energy barrier. In biology, electron transfer is known to occur over large distances (up to about 25 X 10 m). Given the mass of protium is 1840 times that of the electron, the same probability for protium... 

Experiments and calculations both indicate that electron transfer from potassium to water is spontaneous and rapid, whereas electron transfer from silver to water does not occur. In redox terms, potassium oxidizes easily, but silver resists oxidation. Because oxidation involves the loss of electrons, these differences in reactivity of silver and potassium can be traced to how easily each metal loses electrons to become an aqueous cation. One obvious factor is their first ionization energies, which show that it takes much more energy to remove an electron from silver than from potassium 731 kJ/mol for Ag and 419 kJ/mol for K. The other alkali metals with low first ionization energies, Na, Rb, Cs, and Fr, all react violently with water. 

Although the kinetic studies summarised here are useful guides to the gross features of mechanism it is evident from apparently closely related autoxidations, e.g. those of V(III) and U(IV), that subtle factors operate. Fallab has pointed out that these reductants give similar kinetics and possess similar reduction potentials, yet differ in autoxidation rate by a factor of 3 x 10 , and has discussed differences of this type in terms of the stereochemistry of the electron-transfer process in the coordination sphere. 

---