Symmetry factors

P is a symmetry factor equal to the fraction of the potential that promotes the cathodic reaction. The reaction rate and current are related through Faraday s law... 

The term a is a symmetry factor for the energy threshold for the passage of electrons and is approximately equal to 0.5. In Fig. 2-4, the value of a was chosen as Vs for better distinction integer exponents are chosen for Tq, G and Gq for clarity,... 

There are several general classes of pericyclic reactions for which orbital symmetry factors determine both the stereochemistry and relative reactivity. The first class that we will consider are electrocyclic reactions. An electrocyclic reaction is defined as the formation of a single bond between the ends of a linear conjugated system of n electrons and the reverse process. An example is the thermal ring opening of cyclobutenes to butadienes ... 

Transfer Coefficient, Symmetry Factor and Stoichiometric Number... 

In Section 1.4 it was assumed that the rate equation for the h.e.r. involved a parameter, namely the transfer coefficient a, which was taken as approximately 0-5. However, in the previous consideration of the rate of a simple one-step electron-transfer process the concept of the symmetry factor /3 was introduced, and was used in place of a, and it was assumed that the energy barrier was almost symmetrical and that /3 0-5. Since this may lead to some confusion, an attempt will be made to clarify the situation, although an adequate treatment of this complex aspect of electrode kinetics is clearly impossible in a book of this nature and the reader is recommended to study the comprehensive work by Bockris and Reddy. ... 

In this way we can obtain1 an expression for Wcj in a solution containing a few solute molecules a symmetry factor can be included, to make the expression applicable to either heteronuclear or homonuclear particles ... 

Note that Lewis acidity decreases, whereas Brpnsted acidity increases, going down the table. There is no contradiction here when we remember that in the Lewis picture the actual acid in all Brpnsted acids is the same, namely, the proton. In comparing, say, HI and HF, we are not comparing different Lewis acids but only how easily F and 1 give up the proton. The effect discussed here is an example of a symmetry factor. For an extended discussion, see Eberson, L. in Patai The Chemistry of Carboxylic Acids and Esters, Wiley NY, 1969,... 

The final expression is the classical limit, valid above a certain critical temperature, which, however, in practical cases is low (i.e. 85 K for H2, 3 K for CO). For a homonuclear or a symmetric linear molecule, the factor a equals 2, while for a het-eronuclear molecule cr=l (Tab. 3.1). This symmetry factor stems from the indistinguishable permutations the molecule may undergo due to the rotation and actually also involves the nuclear partition function. The symmetry factor can be estimated directly from the symmetry of the molecule. 

Table 3.1. The symmetry factor for different symmet groups and examples of molecules belonging to them.

This completes our discussion of the beisis and factors developed by past investigators to describe and conceptulize the structure of solids. You will note that we have not yet fully described the s)unmetry factor of solids. The reason for this is that we use symmetry factors to characterize solid structure without resorting to the theoretical basis of structure determination. That is, we have a standard method for categorizing solid structures. We say that salt, NaCl, is cubic. That is, the Na" ion and the Cl ion are alternately arranged in a close-packed cubic structure. The next section now investigates these structure protocols. 

Important parameters involved in the Volmer-Butler equation are the transfer coefficients a and (1. They are closely related to the Bronsted relation [Eq. (14.5)] and can be rationalized in terms of the slopes of the potential energy surfaces [Eq. (14.9)]. Due to the latter, the transfer coefficients a and P are also called symmetry factors since they are related to the symmetry of the transitional configuration with respect to the initial and final configurations. 

As follows from the Bronsted relationship, the symmetry factors for the cathode and anode processes are related to each other [see Eq. (6.17a)] ... 

A simple quadratic form of Eq. (34.10) is due to an identical parabolic form of the free-energy surfaces f/, and U. Since the dependence of the activation free energy on AF is nonhnear, the symmetry factor a may be introduced by a differential relationship,... 

An important exact result follows from Eq. (34.27) for the observable symmetry factor defined as... 

The observable symmetry factor is equal to the average value of the partial symmetry factor a(e), dehned by Eq. (34.12) for the transition from the energy level e ... 

Equation (34.32) is remarkable in the relation that it shows that (1) the observable symmetry factor is determined by occupation of the electron energy level in the metal, giving the major contribution to the current, and (2) that the observable symmetry factor does not leave the interval of values between 0 and 1. The latter means that one cannot observe the inverted region in a traditional electrochemical experiment. Equation (34.32) shows that in the normal region (where a bs is close to ) the energy levels near the Fermi level provide the main contribution to the current, whereas in the activationless (a bs 0) and barrierless (a bs 1) regions, the energy levels below and above the Fermi level, respectively, play the major role. 

The same symmetry factor ratio can be derived also for the (2,3) and (3,4) equilibria. The value 2.75 cal/degree mol is very close to the experimental result given in equation 38, considering that the experimental error expected is more than 1 cal/degreemol. 

Thus, for a transition between any two vibrational levels of the proton, the fluctuation of the molecular surrounding provides the activation. For each such transition, the motion along the proton coordinate is of quantum (sub-barrier) character. Possible intramolecular activation of the H—O chemical bond is taken into account in the theory by means of the summation of the probabilities of transitions between all the excited vibrational states of the proton with a weighting function corresponding to the thermal distribution.3,36 Incorporation in the theory of the contribution of the excited states enabled us in particular to improve the agreement between the theory and experiment with respect to the independence of the symmetry factor of the potential in a wide region of 8[Pg.135]

Further development of the basic model and the detailed analysis of the dependence of the symmetry factor on the potential and the temperature54 have shown that there are additional factors which can affect the elementary act of this reaction. These investigations led to the formulation of the charge variation model (CVM)55 which will be discussed in the next section. 

Figure 8. Dependence of the symmetry factor a on the free energy of the transition for the reaction of hydrogen ion discharge on a metal electrode.

The prediction that the suprafacial path is forbidden, and the antarafacial one allowed (8) stimulated many experiments. In particular, the thermal rearrangements of the molecules shown in Fig. 17 a have been studied in detail (26) here the constraints due to molecular architecture do not allow antarafacial paths, so that stereochemical mutations must take place to preserve orbital symmetry (Fig. 17b)- These mutations can also be controlled by the bulk of the substituents R and R, so that steric and symmetry factors interact in a most interesting way. 

The calculations thus fail to indicate any substantial energy preference for the allowed paths with respect to the forbidden ones. An inspection of the overall shape of the surface confirms, however, that along the allowed CCW path a less steep slope has to be climbed (Fig. 18). The general conclusion is that steric and symmetry factors are so intimately interwoven that it is impossible to distinguish their relative importance in cases where the magnitudes of the two effects are similar. This can perhaps be taken as a warning that orbital symmetry rules should only be applied with some caution to very strained systems. 

---