Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electron transfer nuclear tunneling factor

A recently proposed semiclassical model, in which an electronic transmission coefficient and a nuclear tunneling factor are introduced as corrections to the classical activated-complex expression, is described. The nuclear tunneling corrections are shown to be important only at low temperatures or when the electron transfer is very exothermic. By contrast, corrections for nonadiabaticity may be significant for most outer-sphere reactions of metal complexes. The rate constants for the Fe(H20)6 +-Fe(H20)6 +> Ru(NH3)62+-Ru(NH3)63+ and Ru(bpy)32+-Ru(bpy)33+ electron exchange reactions predicted by the semiclassical model are in very good agreement with the observed values. The implications of the model for optically-induced electron transfer in mixed-valence systems are noted. [Pg.109]

Classically, the rate of electron transfer is determined by the rate of passage of the system over the barrier defined by the surfaces. In the semiclassical model (13) a nuclear tunneling factor that measures the increase in rate arising from... [Pg.114]

The value of log rn for the Fe(H20) 2+ - Fe(H20)6 + exchange (which features a relatively large inner-sphere barrier) is plotted as a function of 1/T in Figure 5. The nuclear tunneling factors are close to unity at room temperature but become very large at low temperatures. As a consequence of nuclear tunneling, the electron transfer rates at low temperatures will be much faster than those calculated from the classical model. [Pg.118]

To summarize, in this article we have discussed some aspects of a semiclassical electron-transfer model (13) in which quantum-mechanical effects associated with the inner-sphere are allowed for through a nuclear tunneling factor, and electronic factors are incorporated through an electronic transmission coefficient or adiabaticity factor. We focussed on the various time scales that characterize the electron transfer process and we presented one example to indicate how considerations of the time scales can be used in understanding nonequilibrium phenomena. [Pg.127]

The above treatment neglects nuclear-tunneling effects. The nuclear-tunneling factors calculated for a (hypothetical) electron transfer having the inner-sphere parameters of and [Fe(HjO)jp ions (see Table 1 in 12.2.3.3.4) and no solvent re-... [Pg.82]

The pre-exponential term sometimes also includes a nuclear tunneling factor, r. This arises from a quantum mechanical treatment that accounts for electron transfer for nuclear configurations with energies below the transition state (48, 60). [Pg.118]

From the expressions given for example in Refs. [4,9,29], it can be seen that the nuclear factor, and consequently the electron transfer rate, becomes temperature independent when the temperature is low enough for only the ground level of each oscillator to be populated (nuclear tunneling effect). In the opposite limit where IcgT is greater than all the vibrational quanta hco , the nuclear factor takes an activated form similar to that of Eq. 1 with AG replaced by AU [4,9,29]. The model has been refined to take into account the frequency shifts that may accompany the change of redox state [22]. [Pg.11]

Secondly, the model of thermal diffusion does not allow one to explain the independence of the reaction rate on temperature observed for many low-temperature electron transfer processes. Indeed, the thermal diffusion of molecules in liquids and solids is known to be an activated process and its rate must be dependent on temperature. True, at low temperatures when activated processes are very slow, diffusion itself can be assumed to become a non-activated process going on via a mechanism of nuclear tunneling, i.e. by tunneling transitions of atoms over very short (less than 1 A) distances. A sequence of such transitions can, in principle, result in a diffusional approach of reagents in the matrix. Direct tunneling of the electron, whose mass is less than that of an atom by a factor of 10 or 104, can, however, be expected to proceed much faster. [Pg.266]

So far the attention has been on the nuclear reorganization barrier. Nevertheless, other important factors previously hidden in the pre-exponential factor (and ultimately in the standard rate constant) have to be considered, namely, the fundamental question of the magnitude of the electronic interaction between electroactive molecules and energy levels in the electrode (i.e., the degree of adiabaticity) and its variation with the tunneling medium (electrode-solution interface), the tunneling distance, and the electrode material. Thus, within the transition-state formalism, the rate constant for electron transfer can be expressed as the product of three factors [39—42] ... [Pg.38]

Another factor of which a nonclassical theory must take account is the quantisation of the internal modes of D and A, and the consequent relaxation of the Bom-Oppenheimer constraint that the electron must transfer within a fixed nuclear framework. In classical theory, the vibrational modes of D and A are treated as classical harmonic oscillators, but in reality their quantisation is usually significant (that is, one or more of the vibration frequencies v is sufficiently high that the classical limit hv IcT does not apply). Electron transfer then requires the overlap, not only of the electronic wavefunctions of R and P, but also of their vibrational wavefunctions. It is then possible that nuclear tunnelling may assist electron transfer. As shown in Fig. 4.12, the vibrational wave-functions of R and P extend beyond the classical parabolas and overlap to some extent. This permits nuclear tunnelling from the R to the P surface, particularly in the region just below the classical intersection point. Part of the reorganisation of D and A, required prior to ET in the classical picture, may then occur simultaneously withET, by the nuclei tunnelling short (typically < 0.1 A) distances from their R to their P positions. [Pg.235]

All these areas are covered in a broad literature, overviewed, for example in refs. 24 and 25. We do not here address all these elements of molecular charge transfer theory. Instead we discuss the two central factors in the interfacial (bio)electrochemical electron transfer process, first the nuclear reorganization (free) energy and then the electronic tunneling factor. [Pg.255]

Nuclear tunneling is potentially a significant consideration in outer-sphere radical electron transfer reactions. The case of reduction of NO2 to NO2 is notable in that nuclear tunneling is predicted to increase the self-exchange rate constant by a factor of 79 relative to the classical value.75 Kinetic isotope effect measurements could provide experimental evidence for nuclear tunneling. 180/160 KIE measurements have indeed provided evidence for nuclear tunneling in reactions involving the O2/O2 redox couple.76... [Pg.405]

In the quantum-mechanical theories the intersection of the potential energy surfaces is deemphasized and the electron transfer is treated as a radiationless transition between the reactant and product state. Time dependent perturbation theory is used and the restrictions on the nuclear configurations for electron transfer are measured by the square of the overlap of the vibrational wave functions of the reactants and products, i.e. by the Franck-Condon factors for the transition. Classical and quantum mechanical description converge at higher temperature96. At lower temperature the latter theory predicts higher rates than the former as nuclear tunneling is taken into account. [Pg.53]

Effects of nuclear dynamics on electron tunneling in redox proteins have been an important question for the biological electron transfer community. While it has been understood how nuclear dynamics controls the Pranck-Condon factor, little was known until now about how the dynamics affects the tunneling matrix element. Our results show that, when tunneling is dominated by a single pathway tube, dynamical effects are small and Pathways level calculations provide reasonable results. The situation changes when several pathway tub are important and destructive interference exists among them. In this case dynamic amplification becomes important,... [Pg.115]


See other pages where Electron transfer nuclear tunneling factor is mentioned: [Pg.120]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.1183]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.1182]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.7]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.114 , Pg.116 ]




SEARCH



Electron electronic factor

Electron transfer factors

Electron transfer nuclear tunnelling

Electron tunneling

Electron-nuclear tunneling

Electronic factors

Nuclear factor

Nuclear tunneling

Nuclear tunneling factors

Tunneling electron transfer

Tunneling factor

Tunneling transfer

© 2024 chempedia.info