Documentation standards drawings

The standard also requires documents such as FMEA, control plans, etc. to be marked with the customer s specific symbols to indicate those process steps that affect special characteristics. As the characteristics in question will be specified within documents, the required symbols should be applied where the characteristic is mentioned rather than on the face of the document. For drawings, the symbol should be applied close to the appropriate dimension or item. Alternatively, where a document specifies processes that affect a special characteristic, the appropriate symbol should be denoted against the particular stage in the process that affects that characteristic. The symbols therefore need to be applied during document preparation and not to copies of the document. The instructions to apply these symbols should be included within the procedures that govern the preparation of the documents concerned. 

Included in this element are requirements for purchasing documents (specifications, drawings, and purchase orders), selection of suppliers, inspection and control of received material and record-keeping. For ESH/PSM, this element would focus on those aspects of the procurement process which support purchasing according to regulatory requirements, safety standards, risk management controls, etc. 

Detailed project description documents and drawings are required to perform an SSHA. Additionally, relevant codes, standards, and regulations, the PHL, and the PHA for the projects should be available. Access to lessons learned and reliability data is also needed. 

Consistency—In standard drawings and symbols, well-designed document formats, and automated error checking. 

Although writers disagree about the need for new standards, they use many of the same types of arguments to justify their positions. In each document, respondents draw upon previous disasters to warrant their concerns about the new draft revisions. Comments sometimes reflect the respondent s personal experience of how prudent mine operators will act in the presence of risk. Thus, when Bernard asserts that it is reasonable to assume that a prudent mine operator would make smart choices about the location of a fan absent the regulation, Beason counters If all operators were prudent— we wouldn t need any regulations, but history proves that wrong ... 

The standard requires the supplier to establish and maintain documented procedures to control documents of external origin such as standards and customer drawings. 

The document availability requirement applies to both internal and external documents alike. Customer documents such as contracts, drawings, specifications, and standards need to be available to those who need them to execute their responsibilities. Often these documents are only held in paper form and therefore distribution lists will be needed to control their location. If documents in the public domain are required, they only need be available when required for use and need not be available from the moment they are specified in a specification or procedure. You should only have to produce such documents when they are needed for the work being undertaken at the time of the audit. However, you would need to demonstrate that you could obtain timely access when needed. If you provide a lending service to users of copyrighted documents, you would need a register indicating to whom they were loaned so that you can retrieve them when needed by others. 

The standard requires purchasing documents to include, where applicable, the title or other positive identification, and applicable issue of specification, drawings, process requirements, inspection instructions, and other relevant technical data, including requirements for approval or qualification of product, procedures, process equipment, and personnel. 

Make sure that the drawings, specifications and bid documents are clear and unambiguous. Do not rely on exclusion clauses in the specification or bid document. Have designs checked and use methods and equipment that comply with British Standards and Codes of Practice. 

Aseptic BPS machines are subject to steam-in-place sterilization following standard CIP cycles. The SIP cycles are routinely measured by thermocouples located in fixed positions along the product pathway. Validation of SIP cycles should be carried out to demonstrate that consistent sterilization temperatures are achieved throughout the equipment to prove that the system can be effectively sterilized. Validation should also identify suitable positions for routine use, or justify the fixed probe positions already in place. The SIP validation is generally carried out with the help of additional thermocouples and should include the use of biological indicators (appropriate for moist heat sterilization). Test locations should include areas which may be prone to air or condensate entrapment. An accurate engineering line drawing of the system to aid identification of suitable test locations and document test locations selected should be available. 

If the two-factor cases considered here were known to originate (at least approximately) from a normal population, the standard randomized block experiment approach would be admissible for testing the significance of the block effect. A detailed discussion of this technique, widely documented in the statistical textbook literature, is omitted. Table 10 indicates the possibility of drawing qualitatively identical inferences from nonparametric and conventional analysis of variance, even if only one of the two is correct, in principle. 

The standards and customer drawings/specifications are included in the document control system. 

Drawing exclusively upon the Jagschitz Report, on non-revisionist sources such as Pressac, Hil-berg, documents from the archives of the Auschwitz Museum, and on other sources such as standard subject-reference works which are certainly above suspicion, Walter Luftl has shown that the material presented by court expert Jagschitz can be interpreted in other, equally plausible ways, to arrive at the opposite conclusion, namely that... 

Results of analytical measurements are a kind of a product of the chemical analyst s work. Both manufactured products (object of analysis) and analytical results must be of an appropriate quality. In addition, the quality of analytical measurements appears to have its own accumulative requirement the quality of every product is a result of comparison of the obtained value (anal3dical result) with the reference value (expected, standard, norm, required). In order for the obtained result to be comparable (authoritative, reliable) to the reference value, its (high) quality must be documented and maintained. The quality of analytical results must be assured in the first place before drawing conclusions about the quality of the examined products. 

A homogenous document type, stored in a standard graphical file format. Includes scanned paper documents. Many file formats exist, from raw bit-mapped pictures to highly complex vectored drawings in a CAD environment. Simplest file formats are bit-mapped formats (e.g., TIFF, PCX, GIF, JPEG) or generic vectored formats (e.g., WMF, CGM, DXF). Many proprietary formats exist. Some CAD formats include product database information. 

---