Distribution of contaminants

Gases, vapors, and small dust particulates are distributed in the space by airflows produced by supply jets, convective flows, or air currents entering the building through the building apertures and cracks. Also, gases and vapors are distributed due to turbulent and molecular diffusion. Distribution of contaminants with airflows is significantly faster (hundreds of times) than distribution due to molecular diffusion. 

Basic Equations and Required Data for Calculating the Phase Distribution of Contaminants under Equilibrium Conditions... 

When the SVE technology is applied in a contaminated site, the NAPL is gradually removed. Towards the end of the remediation and when NAPL is no longer present, a three-phase model should be considered to calculate the phase distribution of contaminants (see Table 14.3). In this case, the vapor concentration in pore air (Ca) is calculating using the Henry s Law equation (Equation 14.5), which describes the equilibrium established between gas and aqueous phases ... 

The concentration, mass, and distribution of contaminants in the soil and groundwater. 

Terrado M, Barcelo D, Tauler R (2006) Identification and distribution of contamination sources in the Ebro river basin by chemometrics modelling coupled to geographical information systems. Talanta 70 691-704... 

In the case of data following a trilinear model structure [7], the profiles in the score matrices X in Xaug of (10) will present the same shape in the score profiles (or, in other words, the relative distribution of contamination patterns among samples in the different data matrices is the same) in the different individual data matrices D (obtained in the different sampling campaigns). In this case, the data set fulfills the trilinear model [7, 15, 21], which can be described by (11) (in this equation, superindex t in D k and X k matrices indicates that they conform to the trilinear model) ... 

Ewins, D.J., D.V. Weseloh, and P. Mineau. 1992. Geographical distribution of contaminants and productivity measures of herring gulls in the Great Lakes Lake Huron 1980. Jour. Great Lakes Res. 18 316-330. 

Levine, A.D., G. Tchobanoglous, and T. Asano (1985), Characterization of size distribution of contaminants in wastewater treatment and reuse implications, J. WPCF, 57, 805. 

The distribution of contamination on the body and other relevant information (e.g., locations of wounds) should be recorded. Administrative information that should also be recorded includes the patient s name the name of the individual conducting the survey the time, date, and location of the survey, and the serial number and type of instrument. A survey form with a diagram of an anatomical figure (Standard Form 531) is available from the U.S. General Services Administration s web site (http //www.gsa.gov/forms/medical.htm) and is suitable for this purpose. 

Contamination assessment of an injured individual should be performed by a trained health professional under the supervision of on-the-scene medical personnel. This assessment should include collecting radiation and chemical agent measurements using instrumentation identified in Section 6.12, nasal wipes, and collection of saliva, blood, and other samples for laboratory testing. The distribution of contamination and locations of wounds on the body should be recorded. 

Suppose EPA scientists are investigating lead contamination of soil near an abandoned mining and smelting operation. How should the soil be sampled so that the analytical results obtained on the individual samples provide a reliable indication of the range and distribution of contamination of the entire site ... 

There is a substantial range of costs for Geo-Cleanse in situ chemical oxidation. Factors impacting project costs include the volume and distribution of contamination, the quantity and nature of the contaminant, and the hydraulic conductivity of the formation. These parameters effect the number of injectors needed, amount of hydrogen peroxide and other reagents required, and the time requirements for delivery of injections to the subsurface. Unit costs for large sites with high contamination levels have been reported to be less than 50/kg of contaminant oxidized. Conversely, small low-level contamination sites can be associated with costs over 100/kg of contaminant oxidized (D186612, p. 10). 

Two studies with raw materials used to prepare parenteral formulations were carried out to show their content of aluminum and arsenic [15,16]. It is possible to see in Figures 2 and 3 that aluminum and arsenic were present in all investigated raw materials. There were also different levels of contamination among the substances. While salts such as NaCl and KC1 presented low aluminum contaminations, phosphates, gluconate, and also citric acid were relatively contaminated. The authors attributed this difference to the affinity of aluminum to the latter substances. Arsenic showed a more uniform distribution of contamination. With the exception of the amino acid tyrosine, the arsenic level in all substances was below 1 qg/g, not exceeding the limits prescribed by pharmacopeias. 

The main objective of site characterization is to identify the contaminants, their concentration, and the extent of contamination. The distribution of contaminants between soil and groundwater will largely determine whether soil or groundwater treatment is applicable, while the extent of contamination will largely determine the applicability of soil excavation and treatment. 

Not surprisingly, all the data pertaining to axial distribution of contaminants in the bed were obtained for monolithic catalysts, where such determination is performed simply by successive sectioning (see Fig. 3) and analysis of each separate section. In pelleted catalysts there is considerable spatial mixing of the pellets during operation, and the sampling is also difficult. 

Uneven radial distribution of contaminants can be expected if the design does not ensure uniform flow distribution across the inlet face of the catalyst bed. 

The distribution of contaminants within the porous layer again has to be considered separately for monolithic and pelleted catalysts. Gradients of the contaminant concentration in both cases can be very steep or relatively flat. Some inferences on the poison-carrying species can be deduced from such gradients. 

Distribution of contaminant group. (From USEPA, POD Information Directory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C., December, 1995.)... 

Distribution of contaminant subgroup. (From DOD, Restoration Management Information System, Department of Defense, Office of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental Security), Washington, D.C., November, 1995.)... 

Stumm, W. 1996 Surface chemical theory and predicting the distribution of contaminants in the aquatic environment. Chester C. Kisiel Eleventh Memorial Lecture, University of Arizona, April 5, 1992. 

---