Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Distillation separation methods

Furfural is produced by hydrolysing pentoses of several natural products. As a by-product, furfural is also formed during decomposition of wood in paper mills. It must be separated from the aqueous effluent rapidly or secondary reactions will cause an increasing furfural loss by polymerisation or polycondensation. Distillative separation methods lead to a diminished recovery of furfural of only 35%. [Pg.339]

The components involved in this example are proprietary, but the results are general (Siirola, 1981). During the species allocation stage of the process synthesis procedure, it was determined that each species of a particular four-component stream was required to be relatively pure at four different destinations. The components are liquids at ambient temperatures, have about equal relative volatility differences, and form no azeotropes. Distillative separation methods were selected to resolve all composition property differences. The feed stream composition was dominated (about 70%) by the heaviest component (D). [Pg.30]

For the telomerization of butadiene, distillative separation methods cannot be employed to separate the product from the reaction mixture containing catalyst, because the palladium complex catalyst has not such a high thermal stability... [Pg.365]

Although all fractional distillation operations rely on exploiting differences in the relative volatility (a) of the components to be separated, this difference can arise in a number of ways. Distillation separation methods are classified in Table 6.1 in the order of occurrence in solvent recovery. [Pg.77]

This book studies a broad spectmm of real azeotropic distillation separation methods for a variety of industrially important chemical systems. Economically optimum rigorous steady-state designs are developed for many of these chemical systems. Then practical control structures are developed that provide effective load rejection in the face of typically large disturbances in throughput and feed composition. Trade-offs between steady-state energy savings and dynamic controllability (product quality variability) are demonstrated. [Pg.471]

The choice of separation method to be appHed to a particular system depends largely on the phase relations that can be developed by using various separative agents. Adsorption is usually considered to be a more complex operation than is the use of selective solvents in Hquid—Hquid extraction (see Extraction, liquid-liquid), extractive distillation, or azeotropic distillation (see Distillation, azeotropic and extractive). Consequentiy, adsorption is employed when it achieves higher selectivities than those obtained with solvents. [Pg.291]

These values, which match experience, suggest that distillation should be the preferred separation method for feed concentrations of 10—90%, but is probably a poor choice for feed concentrations of less than 1%. Techniques such as adsorption (qv), chemical reaction, and ion exchange (qv) ate chiefly used to remove impurity concentrations of <1%. [Pg.84]

Whereas Hquid separation method selection is clearly biased toward simple distillation, no such dominant method exists for gas separation. Several methods can often compete favorably. Moreover, the appropriateness of a given method depends to a large extent on specific process requirements, such as the quantity and extent of the desired separation. The situation contrasts markedly with Hquid mixtures in which the appHcabiHty of the predominant distiHation-based separation methods is relatively insensitive to scale or purity requirements. The lack of convenient problem representation techniques is another complication. Many of the gas—vapor separation methods ate kinetically controUed and do not lend themselves to graphical-phase equiHbrium representations. In addition, many of these methods require the use of some type of mass separation agent and performance varies widely depending on the particular MSA chosen. [Pg.457]

An enrichment is defined as a separation process that results in the increase in concentration of one or mote species in one product stream and the depletion of the same species in the other product stream. Neither high purity not high recovery of any components is achieved. Gas enrichment can be accompHshed with a wide variety of separation methods including, for example, physical absorption, molecular sieve adsorption, equiHbrium adsorption, cryogenic distillation, condensation, and membrane permeation. [Pg.457]

A sharp separation results in two high purity, high recovery product streams. No restrictions ate placed on the mole fractions of the components to be separated. A separation is considered to be sharp if the ratio of flow rates of a key component in the two products is >10. The separation methods that can potentially obtain a sharp separation in a single step ate physical absorption, molecular sieve adsorption, equiHbrium adsorption, and cryogenic distillation. Chemical absorption is often used to achieve sharp separations, but is generally limited to situations in which the components to be removed ate present in low concentrations. [Pg.457]

Reversible Processes. Distillation is an example of a theoretically reversible separation process. In fractional distillation, heat is introduced at the bottom stiUpot to produce the column upflow in the form of vapor which is then condensed and turned back down as Hquid reflux or column downflow. This system is fed at some intermediate point, and product and waste are withdrawn at the ends. Except for losses through the column wall, etc, the heat energy spent at the bottom vaporizer can be recovered at the top condenser, but at a lower temperature. Ideally, the energy input of such a process is dependent only on the properties of feed, product, and waste. Among the diffusion separation methods discussed herein, the centrifuge process (pressure diffusion) constitutes a theoretically reversible separation process. [Pg.75]

Irreversible processes are mainly appHed for the separation of heavy stable isotopes, where the separation factors of the more reversible methods, eg, distillation, absorption, or chemical exchange, are so low that the diffusion separation methods become economically more attractive. Although appHcation of these processes is presented in terms of isotope separation, the results are equally vaUd for the description of separation processes for any ideal mixture of very similar constituents such as close-cut petroleum fractions, members of a homologous series of organic compounds, isomeric chemical compounds, or biological materials. [Pg.76]

Favorable Vapoi Liquid Equilibria. The suitabiHty of distiUation as a separation method is strongly dependent on favorable vapor—Hquid equiHbria. The absolute value of the key relative volatiHties direcdy determines the ease and economics of a distillation. The energy requirements and the number of plates required for any given separation increase rapidly as the relative volatiHty becomes lower and approaches unity. For example given an ideal binary mixture having a 50 mol % feed and a distillate and bottoms requirement of 99.8% purity each, the minimum reflux and minimum number of theoretical plates for assumed relative volatiHties of 1.1,1.5, and 4, are... [Pg.175]

As mentioned earlier the ease or difficulty of separating two products depends on the difference in their vapor pressures or volatilities. There are situations in the refining industry in which it is desirable to recover a single valuable compound in high purity from a mixture with other hydrocarbons which have boiling points so close to the more valuable product that separation by conventional distillation is a practical impossibility. Two techniques which may be applied to these situations are azeotropic distillation and extractive distillation. Both methods depend upon the addition to the system of a third component which increases the relative volatility of the constituents to be separated. [Pg.83]

The natural world is one of eomplex mixtures petroleum may eontain 10 -10 eomponents, while it has been estimated that there are at least 150 000 different proteins in the human body. The separation methods necessary to cope with complexity of this kind are based on chromatography and electrophoresis, and it could be said that separation has been the science of the 20th century (1, 2). Indeed, separation science spans the century almost exactly. In the early 1900s, organic and natural product chemistry was dominated by synthesis and by structure determination by degradation, chemical reactions and elemental analysis distillation, liquid extraction, and especially crystallization were the separation methods available to organic chemists. [Pg.3]

The same analytical methods as for liquid sodium have been applied. Distillation separates and concentrates the impurities prior to analysis. Amalgamation has poor recovery value for oxygen compared to distillation (Table 1). ... [Pg.345]

The most common alternative to distillation for the separation of low-molecular-weight materials is absorption. Liquid flowrate, temperature and pressure are important variables to be set, but no attempt should be made to carry out any optimization at this stage. Other commonly used separation methods are adsorption and membranes. [Pg.649]

One method of purifying the benzyl cyanide is to steam distil it after the alcohol has been first distilled from the reaction mixture. At ordinary pressures, this steam distillation is very slow and, with an ordinary condenser, requires eighteen to twenty hours in order to remove all of the volatile product from a run of 500 g. of benzyl chloride. The distillate separates into two layers the benzyl cyanide layer is removed and distilled. The product obtained in this way is very pure and contains no tarry material, and, after the excess of benzyl chloride has been removed, boils practically constant. This steam distillation is hardly advisable in the laboratory. [Pg.6]

Stripping has the technical advantage that the expensive rhodium catalyst remains in the reactor and the disadvantage that the least volatile component (acetic acid) has the lowest concentration of all components in the gas removed by stripping. Distillation as a separation method has the advantage that acetic acid is the most abundant component in the liquid, but now rhodium will be circulated in the system and will remain in the bottom of the distillation unit and it should not precipitate anywhere ... [Pg.115]


See other pages where Distillation separation methods is mentioned: [Pg.545]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.1247]    [Pg.2051]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.1]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.77 ]




SEARCH



Distillate separation

Distillation method

Distillation method separation system

Distillation, separations

Separ distillation

Separation distillative

Separation methods

Separative methods

Skill 4.1e-Describe various methods for separation of solutions (e.g., chromatography, distillation)

© 2024 chempedia.info