Separating agents

This technique is useful not only when the mixture is impossible to separate by conventional distillation because of an azeotrope but also when the mixture is difficult to separate because of a particularly low relative volatility. Such distillation operations in which an extraneous mass-separating agent is used can be divided into two broad classes. 

In the first class, azeotropic distillation, the extraneous mass-separating agent is relatively volatile and is known as an entrainer. This entrainer forms either a low-boiling binary azeotrope with one of the keys or, more often, a ternary azeotrope containing both keys. The latter kind of operation is feasible only if condensation of the overhead vapor results in two liquid phases, one of which contains the bulk of one of the key components and the other contains the bulk of the entrainer. A t3q)ical scheme is shown in Fig. 3.10. The mixture (A -I- B) is fed to the column, and relatively pure A is taken from the column bottoms. A ternary azeotrope distilled overhead is condensed and separated into two liquid layers in the decanter. One layer contains a mixture of A -I- entrainer which is returned as reflux. The other layer contains relatively pure B. If the B layer contains a significant amount of entrainer, then this layer may need to be fed to an additional column to separate and recycle the entrainer and produce pure B. 

The second class of distillation operation using an extraneous mass-separating agent is extractive distillation. Here, the extraneous mass-separating agent is relatively involatile and is known as a solvent. This operation is quite different from azeotropic distillation in that the solvent is withdrawn from the column bottoms and does not form an azeotrope with any of the components. A typical extractive distillation process is shown in Fig. 3.11. ... 

As with azeotropic distillation, the separation is possible in extractive distillation because the extraneous mass-separating agent interacts more strongly with one of the components than the other. This in turn alters in a favorable way the relative volatility between the key components. 

In principle, extractive distillation is more useful than azeotropic distillation because the process does not depend on the accident of azeotrope formation, and thus a greater choice of mass-separating agent is, in principle, possible. In general, the solvent should have a chemical structure similar to that of the less volatile of the two components. It will then tend to form a near-ideal mixture with the less volatile component and a nonideal mixture with the more volatile component. This has the effect of increasing the volatility of the more volatile component. 

If an azeotropic mixture is to be separated by distillation, then use of pressure change to alter the azeotropic composition should be considered before use of an extraneous mass-separating agent. Avoiding the use of extraneous materials often can prevent environmental problems later in the design. 

The choice of separation method to be appHed to a particular system depends largely on the phase relations that can be developed by using various separative agents. Adsorption is usually considered to be a more complex operation than is the use of selective solvents in Hquid—Hquid extraction (see Extraction, liquid-liquid), extractive distillation, or azeotropic distillation (see Distillation, azeotropic and extractive). Consequentiy, adsorption is employed when it achieves higher selectivities than those obtained with solvents. 

A significant advantage of adsorbents over other separative agents Hes in the fact that favorable equiHbrium-phase relations can be developed for particular separations adsorbents can be produced that are much more selective in their affinity for various substances than are any known solvents. This selectivity is particularly tme of the synthetic crystalline zeoHtes containing exchangeable cations. These zeoHtes became available in the early 1960s under the name of molecular sieves (qv) (9). 

MIBK is a highly effective separating agent for metals from solutions of their salts and is used in the mining industries to extract plutonium from uranium, niobium from tantalum, and zirconium from hafnium (112,113). MIBK is also used in the production of specialty surfactants for inks (qv), paints, and pesticide formulations, examples of which are 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn-4,7-diol and its ethoxylated adduct. Other appHcations include as a solvent for adhesives and wax/oil separation (114), in leather (qv) finishing, textile coating, and as a denaturant for ethanol formulations. 

Determine identity of any additional species to be used as mass separating agent (MSA). 

Separation method Characteristic properties Separation principle Separation agent Industrial appHcation... 

D/B = distillate-to-bottoms ratio, RCM = residue curve map, DRD = distillation region diagram, and MSA = mass separating agent. 

Whereas Hquid separation method selection is clearly biased toward simple distillation, no such dominant method exists for gas separation. Several methods can often compete favorably. Moreover, the appropriateness of a given method depends to a large extent on specific process requirements, such as the quantity and extent of the desired separation. The situation contrasts markedly with Hquid mixtures in which the appHcabiHty of the predominant distiHation-based separation methods is relatively insensitive to scale or purity requirements. The lack of convenient problem representation techniques is another complication. Many of the gas—vapor separation methods ate kinetically controUed and do not lend themselves to graphical-phase equiHbrium representations. In addition, many of these methods require the use of some type of mass separation agent and performance varies widely depending on the particular MSA chosen. 

Melt Crystallization. The use of a solvent can be avoided in some systems. In such cases, the system operates with heat as a separating agent, as do several processes involving crystallization from solution, but formation of crystalline material is from a melt of the crystallizing species rather than a solution. 

The second step is to sketch the residue curve map for the mixture to be separated. The residue curve map allows one to determine whether the goal can be reached and if so how to reach it, or whether the goal needs to be redefined. The addition of a separating agent to meet a separation objective carries with it the additional responsibiHty of finding an effective method for its recovery for reuse. 

Only a fraction of the known azeotropes are sufficientiy pressure-sensitive for the conventional pressure-swing distillation process to work. However, the concept can be extended to pressure-insensitive azeotropes by adding a separating agent which forms a pressure-sensitive azeotrope and distillation boundary. Then the pressure is varied to shift the location of the distillation boundary (85). 

The simple and complex distillation operations just described all have two things in common (1) both rectifying and stripping sections are providea so that a separation can be achieved between two components that are adjacent in volatility and (2) the separation is effected only by the addition and removal of energy and not by the addition of any mass separating agent (MSA) such as in liquid-liquid extraction. 

Introduction The term azeotropic distillation has been apphed to a broad class of fractional distillation-based separation techniques in that specific azeotropic behavior is exploited to effect a separation. The agent that causes the specific azeotropic behavior, often called the entrainer, may already be present in the feed mixture (a self-entraining mixture) or may be an added mass-separation agent. Azeotropic distillation techniques are used throughout the petro-... 

Which separating agents should be selected for interception (e.g., resin, activated carbon, oil, zeolite, air, steam) ... 

What is the optimal flowrate of each separating agent ... 

How should these separating agents be matched with the CE-laden streams (i.e., stream pairings) ... 

Garrison, G. W., Cooley, B. L., and El-Halwagi, M. M. (1995). Synthesis of mass exchange networks with multiple target mass separating agents. Dev. Chem. Eng. Miner. Proc. 3(1), 31-19. 

---