Difficult matrices

The development of sensitive and inexpensive immunoassays for low molecular weight pesticides has been an important trend in environmental and analytical sciences during the past two decades. 0.27-29 jq design an immunoassay for a pesticide, one can rely on the immunoassay literature for agrochemicals, " but many of the innovations in clinical immunoanalysis are also directly applicable to environmental analysis. - Conversely, the exquisite sensitivity required and difficult matrices present for many environmental immunoassay applications have forced the development of technologies that are also useful in clinical immunoassay applications. In the following discussion we will describe widely accepted procedures for the development of pesticide immunoassays. 

In addition to HPLC/fluorescence, there are references to the use of both APCI and/or ESI with HPLC/MS for the determination of A/-methyl carbamate insecticides in a variety of matrices." Ongoing studies at the US EPA for the determination of /V-methyl carbamate insecticides in nine fmits and vegetables at the 1.0 ngg level are described below. The fruits and vegetables investigated were cranberries, peaches, blueberries, kiwi, carrots, tomatoes, potatoes, lettuce, and grapefmit juice. The purpose of including an account of this work is to illustrate why HPLC/MS/MS is the method of choice for residue work at the 1.0 ng g level, especially for difficult matrices. 

Houben [256] has compared the determination of flame-retardant elements Br, P, S, K, Cl and F in polycarbonate using commercial (X40 and UniQuant ) software. For the X40 method, a calibration line for each element in PC or PC/ABS blends was mapped for the conversion of intensities to concentrations. With the universal UniQuant method, sensitivity factors (ks) were calibrated with pure standards. The X40 method turned out to be more reliable than UniQuant for the determination of FRs in PC and PC/ABS blends, even in the case of calibration of k values with PC standards. Standard errors of 5 % were achieved for Br, P, S and K, and 20% for Cl and F the latter element could not be determined by means of UniQuant (Table 8.44). GFR PC cannot be quantified with these two methods, because of the heterogeneous nature of the composites. Other difficult matrices for XRF analysis are PBT, PS and PP compounds containing both BFRs and Sb203 (10-30wt %) due to self-absorption of Sb and interelement effects. 

Figure 24-20 Gas chromatograms showing sulfur compounds in natural gas (o) flame ionization detector response and (b) sulfur chemiluminescence detector response. The organosulfur compounds are too dilute to be seen in flame ionization, and the sulfur chemiluminescence is insensitive to hydrocarbons. [From N. G. Johansen and J. W. Birks, Determination of Sulfur Compounds in Difficult Matrices." Am. Lob. February 1991.112.]...

Sensitivity can be extended by several means. Ultrasonic vibration during electrodeposition lowers the detection limit and enables the analysis of some analytes in difficult matrices.24 In another approach, the detection limit for Fe(III) in seawater is 10 11 M with a catalytic stripping... 

An important feature of the traceability structure described above is an improved reliability of data as a result of reference measurements rather than the use of reference materials alone. Reference measurements allow exact matching of the sample matrix. This is very important in clinical chemistry where difficult matrices are quite common. 

Tschmelak, J., M. Kumpf, G. Proll, et al. 2004. Biosensor for seven sulphonamides in drinking, ground, and surface water with difficult matrices. Anal. Lett. 37 1701-1718. 

In this chapter, techniques for the extraction of volatile compounds from various matrices are described. Details are provided on the basic theory and applications of each technique with a focus on providing useful information to the analyst working on the analysis of volatile analytes from difficult matrices. Since the analytes are volatile, most of the techniques are geared toward preparation of samples for gas chromatography, although they are appropriate for many instrumental methods. The chapter is heavily referenced and the reader should refer to the appropriate references for more details on a particular technique or application. 

Dlflubenzuron. The benzoylphenyl urea Insect growth regulators, for example, pose a formidable residue analysis problem. The compounds are nonvolatile and thus must be derivatized for GC analysis by a rather arduous chemical procedure. The immunoassay developed in this laboratory is much more sensitive and reproducible at a fraction of the cost and can be used to analyze the more difficult matrices such as milk. For instance, a sensitivity of 1 ppb is routinely obtained when milk is added directly to the assay ( .). A series of partition steps can also be added to further clean dlflubenzuron milk extracts yielding a sensitivity in the low ppt range (4). However this increase in sensitivity may not be needed since methods in current use provide a detection limit of only 10-50 ppb. 

There is a need at the laboratory level for reagents capable of selective removal of chemical species from other similar species, often in difficult matrices. These separations may be required for preparing solutions for subsequent analysis by concentrating a primary ion or to remove interfering constituents. MRT has found application in several of these uses and has promise to be used in others [42]. 

In analytical chromatography the aim of the separation is to obtain quantitative and qualitative information about the compounds of interest (analytes) in a sample. Analytical chemists have to analyze a variety of complex samples often originating in difficult matrices to answer questions about the quality and quantity of different analytes. A complex sample often contains a wide range of components with varying solubility s. Therefore the sample preparation and the separation methods must be highly selective and sensitive. These requirements are satisfied with HPLC especially if combined... 

Dr Martin Brennan is an analytical scientist of more than 30 years standing with considerable experience in atomic spectroscopy. He has a MSc in analytical science from Queens University, Belfast and a PhD in atomic spectroscopy and electroanalytical techniques from University College Cork, Ireland. He is the author and co-author of several published articles in atomic spectroscopy and electrochemical sciences. His research interests include trace analysis of difficult matrices and improvements in sample preparation techniques. He has considerable experience in the analysis of a wide range of samples particularly organic type samples and is currently employed in the Research and Development Department of Henkel (Ireland) Ltd, manufacturers of adhesives and other organic compounds. He holds the position of honorary secretary of the Republic of Ireland sub-region Analytical Division of the Royal Society of Chemistry. 

Dc arc spectrography is still a most powerful method for trace determinations in solids even with difficult matrices such as U3Og. Here the detection limits for many elements are down in the sub-pg/g range [358]. It is still in use for survey analysis, especially in the case of ores, minerals and geological samples. In work with unipolar arcs, re-ignition of the arc is often facilitated by providing an hf discharge over the dc arc, by which the arc channel is kept electrically conductive. 

The determination of nitrite in egg highlights the beneficial aspects of sonoelec-trochemical analysis in difficult matrices. Moreover, the advantages of the technique include significant simplification over the liquid chromatographic procedure currently employed for nitrite detection [69], which involves hot water extraction, protein precipitation and solid-phase extraction / purification. 

A variety of miscellaneous applications have been developed for separation from difficult matrices and purification of specific materials. These include ... 

In neutron activation analysis, the mineralization of the samples, the separation of the elements of interest, the elimination of interfering elements, and so forth can generally be posQioned till after the irradiation—at a moment when the radioisotopes to be measured are formed. At diis time, contamination of the sample or addition of extraneous material, e.g., with chemical reagents, no longer matters. This relative freedom of contamination explains—certainly in large part— why neutron activation analysis played such an important role in the establishment of the normal levels of numerous trace metals in difficult matrices such as human blood plasma or serum. Indeed, sample contamination may be safely regarded as the Achilles heel of trace clement determinations. 

---