Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Difference between reversed-phase

In matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) the sample is mixed with a suitable powdered solid-phase until a homogeneous dry, free flowing powder is obtained with the sample dispersed over the entire material. A wide variety of solid-phase materials can be used, but for the non-ionic surfactants usually a reversed-phase C18 type of sorbent is applied. The mixture is subsequently (usually dry) packed into a glass column. Next, the analytes of interest are eluted with a suitable solvent or solvent mixture. The competition between reversed-phase hydrophobic chains in the dispersed solid-phase and the solvents results in separation of lipids from analytes. Separation of analytes and interfering substances can also be achieved if polarity differences are present. The MSPD technique has been proven to be successful for a variety of matrices and a wide range of compounds [43], thanks to its sequential extraction matrices analysed include fish tissues [44,45] as well as other diverse materials [46,47]. [Pg.464]

The emf of a reversible cell can be regarded either as a function of the free energy change associated with the overall cell reaction or as a sum of the Galvani potential differences between phases within the cell. It was noted above, however, that individual Galvani potential differences between nonidentical phases could not be measured and it is therefore impossible to resolve a cell emf into its interphasial components. On the other hand, every cell reaction consists of an oxidation and a reduction process and thus can be considered as the sum of two notional half-reactions occurring in notional half-cells . For example, the Daniell cell can be visualized as consisting of the half-cells... [Pg.28]

GL Lookhart, LD Albers. Correlations between reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and acid- and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic data on prolamines from wheat sister lines differing widely in baking quality. Cereal Chem 65 222-227, 1988. [Pg.165]

More recently, pyrolysis GC, ESCA, and FTIR have been used to characterize the surface of bonded layers. The reason for the intense interest is the fact that there are significant differences between bonded phases manufactured by different companies, and these investigators hope to find out why. One recent study15 analyzed the decomposition products produced by the reaction of bonded reverse phases with HF, and it was able to determine the type of reaction (monofunctional or polyfunctional), the extent of end capping, and the distribution of lengths of alkyl groups. Some of the results of the study are summarized in Table 7. Such results help explain the differences between bonded phases manufactured by different companies. [Pg.92]

Solute retention in reversed-phase HPLC is dependent on the different distribution coefficients established between a polar mobile and a nonpolar stationary phase by the peptidic components of a mixture. Although there are many similarities between reversed-phase HPLC separations of peptides and the classical liquid-liquid partition chromatographic methods, it is debatable whether the sorption process in reversed-phase HPLC arises due to partition or adsorption events, i.e., whether the nonpolar stationary phase functions as a bulk liquid or as an adsorptive monolayer. These aspects and the theoretical models for reversed-phase HPLC are discussed in a subsequent section. [Pg.93]

Besides the asymmetry between monolayers in cytomembranes, two of the more obvious differences between cubic phases and membranes are the unit cell size and the water activity. It has been argued that tire latter must control the topology of the cubic membranes [15], and hence tiiat the cubic membrane structures must be of the reversed type (in the accepted nomenclature of equilibrium phase behaviour discussed in Chapters 4 and 5 type II) rather than normal (type I). All known lipid-water and lipid-protein-water systems that exhibit phases in equilibrium with excess water are of the reversed type. Thus, water activity alone cannot determine the topology of cubic membranes. Cubic phases have recently been observed with very high water activity (75-90 wt.%), in mixtures of lipids [127], in lipid-protein systems [56], in lipid-poloxamer systems [128], and in lipid A and similar lipopolysaccharides [129,130]. [Pg.322]

In principle, there are no major differences between solid-phase extraction and liquid-liquid extraction, but SPE can avoid or reduce some of the disadvantages of liquid-liquid extraction. Thus, SPE can handle small samples and very dilute solutions, it overcomes the formation of emulsions, and can be easily automated. Furthermore, the sorbents that are commonly used are commercially available as cartridges. These sorbents are alumina, silica gel, reversed-phase silica gel, and various ion-exchange resins. It is also possible to pack different adsorbents in layers inside the same cartridge to give a sandwich-type extraction column. [Pg.11]

A similar example in which 5-fluorouracil has been included demonstrates the wide appUcability of reversed phase systems coupled with aqueous phosphate buffers for the separation of nucleoside bases (Miller et al., 1982). This study also includes a useful comparison of nine different analytical reversed phase columns in combination with different isocratic conditions and clearly demonstrates subtle differences between them. The study concluded that the best stationary phase to maximise the resolution of the test compounds was Spheri-sorb ODS-2 in combination with ammonium phosphate (pH 3.5) as eluent buffer (Fig. 11.1.3). [Pg.149]

Similarly, other polar functional groups in the stationary phase can influence the selectivity of the separation as well. Thus one can find significant differences in selectivity between reversed-phase packings based on silica and those based on polymers. Also, reversed-phase bonded phases with polar functional groups incorporated in the ligand can exhibit significant differences in selectivity compared to their purely hydrophobic counterparts. [Pg.102]

How would the gradient elution program differ between normal-phase and reversed-phase chromatography ... [Pg.828]

A thermochromic phase transition of first order in which the energy of peak A shifts to lower energy in the high tenqperature phase is observed in partially polymerised crystals of PDA-DCH (47). The energies for peak A are similar to those for the urethane substituted PDAs, 1.8 and 2.6 eV, but the energies are reversed in the high and low tmi rature phases. In fully polymerised PDA-DCH the phase change is inhibited. This is in contrast to PDA-TS %diere the differences between the phase transition in the polymer and monomer are very small (48). [Pg.204]

Some surfactants, as for instance the sodium diethylhex-ylsulfosuccinate (better known as AOT), are soluble in oil. These organic solutions may contain small surfactant aggregates. They are able to solubilize water, giving rise to reverse micelles that have an aqueous core. There is no clear or obvious difference between reverse micelles and water-in-oil microemulsions. As pointed out by Friberg there is continuity in phase diagrams between (direct or reverse) micellar solutions, solubilized systems, and microemulsions. [Pg.4]

Fig. 12. Tryptic map of it-PA (mol wt = 66,000) showing peptides formed from hydrolysis of reduced, alkylated rt-PA. Separation by reversed-phase octadecyl (C g) column using aqueous acetonitrile with an added acidic agent to the mobile phase. Arrows show the difference between A, normal, and B, mutant rt-PA where the glutamic acid residue, D, has replaced the normal arginine residue, C, at position 275. Fig. 12. Tryptic map of it-PA (mol wt = 66,000) showing peptides formed from hydrolysis of reduced, alkylated rt-PA. Separation by reversed-phase octadecyl (C g) column using aqueous acetonitrile with an added acidic agent to the mobile phase. Arrows show the difference between A, normal, and B, mutant rt-PA where the glutamic acid residue, D, has replaced the normal arginine residue, C, at position 275.
The appearance of spontaneous polarization in the case of LuTaO is related to volumetric irregularities and ordering of the Li+ - Ta5+ dipoles, as is in the case of the similar niobium-containing compound Li4Nb04F. It can be assumed that the main difference between the two compounds is that the irregularities and the Li+ - Ta5+ dipoles are thermally more stable compared to the niobium-containing system. This increased stability of the dipoles leads to the reversible phase transition at 660°C. [Pg.230]

According to Vitanov et a/.,61,151 C,- varies in the order Ag(100) < Ag(lll), i.e., in the reverse order with respect to that of Valette and Hamelin.24 63 67 150 383-390 The order of electrolytically grown planes clashes with the results of quantum-chemical calculations,436 439 as well as with the results of the jellium/hard sphere model for the metal/electro-lyte interface.428 429 435 A comparison of C, values for quasi-perfect Ag planes with the data of real Ag planes shows that for quasi-perfect Ag planes, the values of Cf 0 are remarkably higher than those for real Ag planes. A definite difference between real and quasi-perfect Ag electrodes may be the higher number of defects expected for a real Ag crystal. 15 32 i25 401407 10-416-422 since the defects seem to be the sites of stronger adsorption, one would expect that quasi-perfect surfaces would have a smaller surface activity toward H20 molecules and so lower Cf"0 values. The influence of the surface defects on H20 adsorption at Ag from a gas phase has been demonstrated by Klaua and Madey.445... [Pg.76]

Prus and Kowalska [75] dealt with the optimization of separation quality in adsorption TLC with binary mobile phases of alcohol and hydrocarbons. They used the window diagrams to show the relationships between separation selectivity a and the mobile phase eomposition (volume fraction Xj of 2-propanol) that were caleulated on the basis of equations derived using Soezewiriski and Kowalska approaehes for three solute pairs. At the same time, they eompared the efficiency of the three different approaehes for the optimization of separation selectivity in reversed-phase TLC systems, using RP-2 stationary phase and methanol and water as the binary mobile phase. The window diagrams were performed presenting plots of a vs. volume fraetion Xj derived from the retention models of Snyder, Schoen-makers, and Kowalska [76]. [Pg.93]

Radke et al. [28] described an automated medium-pressure liquid chromatograph, now commonly called the Kohnen-Willsch instrument. At present, the method is widely used to isolate different fractions of soluble organic matter (for instance, as described in Reference 29 to Reference 31). A combination of normal phase and reversed-phase liquid chromatography has been used by Garrigues et al. [32] to discriminate between different aromatic ring systems and degrees of methylamine in order to characterize thermal maturity of organic matter. [Pg.372]

Figure 12.12 Kinetics of the (2 x 2) —3CO - ( /l9 xvT9)R23.4° — 13CO phase transition on a Pt( 111) electrode in a CO-saturated 0.1M H2SO4 electrolyte, observed via SFG of atop CO. The frequency shift data in (b) and (e) indicate that a new potential is estabhshed on the electrode within 0.2 s. The forward transformation is much slower than the reverse. There are minimal differences between the first and second cycles, indicating minimal change in electrolyte composition during kinetic measurements. Figure 12.12 Kinetics of the (2 x 2) —3CO - ( /l9 xvT9)R23.4° — 13CO phase transition on a Pt( 111) electrode in a CO-saturated 0.1M H2SO4 electrolyte, observed via SFG of atop CO. The frequency shift data in (b) and (e) indicate that a new potential is estabhshed on the electrode within 0.2 s. The forward transformation is much slower than the reverse. There are minimal differences between the first and second cycles, indicating minimal change in electrolyte composition during kinetic measurements.

See other pages where Difference between reversed-phase is mentioned: [Pg.262]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.676]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.2702]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.883]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.311]   


SEARCH



Between different phases

Differences between

Phase difference

© 2024 chempedia.info