Diethyl tartrate asymmetric epoxidation

The first practical method for asymmetric epoxidation of primary and secondary allylic alcohols was developed by K.B. Sharpless in 1980 (T. Katsuki, 1980 K.B. Sharpless, 1983 A, B, 1986 see also D. Hoppe, 1982). Tartaric esters, e.g., DET and DIPT" ( = diethyl and diisopropyl ( + )- or (— )-tartrates), are applied as chiral auxiliaries, titanium tetrakis(2-pro-panolate) as a catalyst and tert-butyl hydroperoxide (= TBHP, Bu OOH) as the oxidant. If the reaction mixture is kept absolutely dry, catalytic amounts of the dialkyl tartrate-titanium(IV) complex are suflicient, which largely facilitates work-up procedures (Y. Gao, 1987). Depending on the tartrate enantiomer used, either one of the 2,3-epoxy alcohols may be obtained with high enantioselectivity. The titanium probably binds to the diol grouping of one tartrate molecule and to the hydroxy groups of the bulky hydroperoxide and of the allylic alcohol... 

This chemical bond between the metal and the hydroxyl group of ahyl alcohol has an important effect on stereoselectivity. Asymmetric epoxidation is weU-known. The most stereoselective catalyst is Ti(OR) which is one of the early transition metal compounds and has no 0x0 group (28). Epoxidation of isopropylvinylcarbinol [4798-45-2] (1-isopropylaHyl alcohol) using a combined chiral catalyst of Ti(OR)4 and L-(+)-diethyl tartrate and (CH2)3COOH as the oxidant, stops at 50% conversion, and the erythro threo ratio of the product is 97 3. The reason for the reaction stopping at 50% conversion is that only one enantiomer can react and the unreacted enantiomer is recovered in optically pure form (28). 

The Sharpless-Katsuki asymmetric epoxidation reaction (most commonly referred by the discovering scientists as the AE reaction) is an efficient and highly selective method for the preparation of a wide variety of chiral epoxy alcohols. The AE reaction is comprised of four key components the substrate allylic alcohol, the titanium isopropoxide precatalyst, the chiral ligand diethyl tartrate, and the terminal oxidant tert-butyl hydroperoxide. The reaction protocol is straightforward and does not require any special handling techniques. The only requirement is that the reacting olefin contains an allylic alcohol. 

In 1980, Katsuki and Sharpless communicated that the epoxidation of a variety of allylic alcohols was achieved in exceptionally high enantioselectivity with a catalyst derived from titanium(IV) isopropoxide and chiral diethyl tartrate. This seminal contribution described an asymmetric catalytic system that not only provided the product epoxide in remarkable enantioselectivity, but showed the immediate generality of the reaction by examining 5 of the 8 possible substitution patterns of allylic alcohols all of which were epoxidized in >90% ee. Shortly thereafter. Sharpless and others began to illustrate the... 

The asymmetric epoxidation of an allylic alcohol 1 to yield a 2,3-epoxy alcohol 2 with high enantiomeric excess, has been developed by Sharpless and Katsuki. This enantioselective reaction is carried out in the presence of tetraisopropoxyti-tanium and an enantiomerically pure dialkyl tartrate—e.g. (-1-)- or (-)-diethyl tartrate (DET)—using tcrt-butyl hydroperoxide as the oxidizing agent. 

In light of the previous discussions, it would be instructive to compare the behavior of enantiomerically pure allylic alcohol 12 in epoxidation reactions without and with the asymmetric titanium-tartrate catalyst (see Scheme 2). When 12 is exposed to the combined action of titanium tetraisopropoxide and tert-butyl hydroperoxide in the absence of the enantiomerically pure tartrate ligand, a 2.3 1 mixture of a- and /(-epoxy alcohol diastereoisomers is produced in favor of a-13. This ratio reflects the inherent diasteieo-facial preference of 12 (substrate-control) for a-attack. In a different experiment, it was found that SAE of achiral allylic alcohol 15 with the (+)-diethyl tartrate [(+)-DET] ligand produces a 99 1 mixture of /(- and a-epoxy alcohol enantiomers in favor of / -16 (98% ee). 

Allylic alcohols can be converted to epoxy-alcohols with tert-butylhydroperoxide on molecular sieves, or with peroxy acids. Epoxidation of allylic alcohols can also be done with high enantioselectivity. In the Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation,allylic alcohols are converted to optically active epoxides in better than 90% ee, by treatment with r-BuOOH, titanium tetraisopropoxide and optically active diethyl tartrate. The Ti(OCHMe2)4 and diethyl tartrate can be present in catalytic amounts (15-lOmol %) if molecular sieves are present. Polymer-supported catalysts have also been reported. Since both (-t-) and ( —) diethyl tartrate are readily available, and the reaction is stereospecific, either enantiomer of the product can be prepared. The method has been successful for a wide range of primary allylic alcohols, where the double bond is mono-, di-, tri-, and tetrasubstituted. This procedure, in which an optically active catalyst is used to induce asymmetry, has proved to be one of the most important methods of asymmetric synthesis, and has been used to prepare a large number of optically active natural products and other compounds. The mechanism of the Sharpless epoxidation is believed to involve attack on the substrate by a compound formed from the titanium alkoxide and the diethyl tartrate to produce a complex that also contains the substrate and the r-BuOOH. ... 

Since its discovery in 1980,7 the Sharpless expoxidation of allylic alcohols has become a benchmark classic method in asymmetric synthesis. A wide variety of primary allylic alcohols have been epoxidized with over 90% optical yield and 70-90% chemical yield using TBHP (r-BuOOH) as the oxygen donor and titanium isopropoxide-diethyl tartrate (DET, the most frequently used dialkyl tartrate) as the catalyst. One factor that simplifies the standard epoxidation reaction is that the active chiral catalyst is generated in situ, which means that the pre-preparation of the active catalyst is not required. 

The idea of double asymmetric induction is also applicable to asymmetric epoxidation (see Chapter 1 for double asymmetric induction). In the case of asymmetric epoxidation involving double asymmetric induction, the enantiose-lectivity depends on whether the configurations of the substrate and the chiral ligand are matched or mismatched. For example, treating 7 with titanium tet-raisopropoxide and t-butyl hydroperoxide without (+)- or ( )-diethyl tartrate yields a mixture of epoxy alcohols 8 and 9 in a ratio of 2.3 1 (Scheme 4 3). In a... 

The asymmetric dihydroxylation protocol was the second massive contribution by Professor Barry Sharpless to synthetic organic chemistry. The first procedure, introduced with Katsuki, involves the catalytic asymmetric epoxida-tion of allylic alcohols. A typical example is shown in Scheme 17, wherein ( )-allylic alcohol (23) is epoxidized with tert-b utyl hyd roperox ide, in the presence of titanium tetra-isopropoxide and optically active diethyl tartrate to give the... 

Asymmetric trishomoallylic epoxidation.1 The 6,7-double bond of 1 is epox-idized stereoselectively to afford 2 with trityl hydroperoxide catalyzed by (-)-diethyl tartrate and Ti(0-i-Pr)4 in the presence of molecular sieves. (-Butyl hydroperoxide is not useful in this case. The product was used for an enantioselective... 

Although it was also Henbest who reported as early as 1965 the first asymmetric epoxidation by using a chiral peracid, without doubt, one of the methods of enantioselective synthesis most frequently used in the past few years has been the "asymmetric epoxidation" reported in 1980 by K.B. Sharpless [3] which meets almost all the requirements for being an "ideal" reaction. That is to say, complete stereofacial selectivities are achieved under catalytic conditions and working at the multigram scale. The method, which is summarised in Fig. 10.1, involves the titanium (IV)-catalysed epoxidation of allylic alcohols in the presence of tartaric esters as chiral ligands. The reagents for this asyimnetric epoxidation of primary allylic alcohols are L-(+)- or D-(-)-diethyl (DET) or diisopropyl (DIPT) tartrate,27 titanium tetraisopropoxide and water free solutions of fert-butyl hydroperoxide. The natural and unnatural diethyl tartrates, as well as titanium tetraisopropoxide are commercially available, and the required water-free solution of tert-bnty hydroperoxide is easily prepared from the commercially available isooctane solutions. 

An alternative method for the epoxidation of enones was developed by Jackson and coworkers in 1997 , who utilized metal peroxides that are modified by chiral ligands such as diethyl tartrate (DET), (5,5)-diphenylethanediol, (—)-ephedrine, ( )-N-methylephedrine and various simple chiral alcohols. The best results were achieved with DET as chiral inductor in toluene. In the stoichiometric version, DET and lithium tert-butyl peroxide, which was generated in situ from TBHP and n-butyllithium, were used as catalyst for the epoxidation of enones. Use of 1.1 equivalent of (-l-)-DET in toluene as solvent afforded (2/f,35 )-chalcone epoxide in 71-75% yield and 62% ee. In the substo-ichiometric method n-butyllithium was replaced by dibutylmagnesium. With this system (10 mol% Bu2Mg and 11 mol% DET), a variety of chalcone-type enones could be oxidized in moderate to good yields (36-61%) and high asymmetric induction (81-94%), giving exactly the other enantiomeric epoxide than obtained with the stoichiometric system (equation 37). 

In 1980, Katsuki and Sharpless described the first really efficient asymmetric epoxidation of allylic alcohols with very high enantioselectivities (ee 90-95%), employing a combination of Ti(OPr-/)4-diethyl tartrate (DET) as chiral catalyst and TBHP as oxidant Stoichiometric conditions were originally described for this system, however the addition of molecular sieves (which trap water traces) to the reaction allows the epoxidation to proceed under catalytic conditions. The stereochemical course of the reaction may be predicted by the empirical rule shown in equations 40 and 41. With (—)-DET, the oxidant approaches the allylic alcohol from the top side of the plane, whereas the bottom side is open for the (-l-)-DET based reagent, giving rise to the opposite optically active epoxide. Various aspects of this reaction including the mechanism, theoretical investigations and synthetic applications of the epoxy alcohol products have been reviewed and details may be found in the specific literature . 

Earlier on in our work, we also used the other legendary Sharpless oxidation, the asymmetric epoxidation [22] for the transformation of the allylic alcohol 17 into the epoxide 18. In the presence of (+)-diethyl tartrate, 17 was converted... 

Asymmetric epoxidation of ailylic alcohols.1 Epoxidation of allylic alcohols with r-bulyl hydroperoxide in the presence of titanium(lV) isopropoxide as the metal catalyst and either diethyl D- or diethyl L-tartrate as the chiral ligand proceeds in > 90% stereoselectivity, which is independent of the substitution pattern of the allylic alcohol but dependent on the chirality of the tartrate. Suggested standard conditions are 2 equivalents of anhydrous r-butyl hydroperoxide with 1 equivalent each of the alcohol, the tartrate, and the titanium catalyst. Lesser amounts of the last two components can be used for epoxidation of reactive allylic alcohols, but it is important to use equivalent amounts of these two components. Chemical yields are in the range of 70-85%. 

Catalytic Reactions. Certain catalytic reactions show a considerable departure from the linear relationship between the ee of a chiral source and the extent of the asymmetric induction (Scheme 42) 68). The Sharpless epoxidation of geraniol using Ti(IV) tetraisopropoxide modified by enantiomerically pure diethyl tartrate (DET) (Ti DET =1 1) gives the epoxide in 94% ee. Kagan and Agami first found that, by using the tartrate auxiliary in 50% ee, the optical yield varied to 70% ee. This optical yield is considerably higher than the expected value, 47 % ee... 

Optically active tartrate esters are the source of chirality for the asymmetric epoxidation process. With a few subtle exceptions, the esters used conventionally—dimethyl (DMT), diethyl (DET), and diisopropyl tartrate (DIPT)—are equally effective at inducing asymmetry during the crucial epoxidation event. The minor exceptions that have been noted include (a) a slight improvement... 

The known allylic alcohol 9 derived from protected dimethyl tartrate is exposed to Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation conditions with (-)-diethyl D-tartrate. The reaction yields exclusively the anti epoxide 10 in 77 % yield. In contrast to the above mentioned epoxidation of the ribose derived allylic alcohol, in this case epoxidation of 9 with MCPBA at 0 °C resulted in a 65 35 mixture of syn/anti diastereomers. The Sharpless epoxidation of primary and secondary allylic alcohols discovered in 1980 is a powerful reagent-controlled reaction.12 The use of titanium(IV) tetraisopropoxide as catalyst, tert-butylhydro-peroxide as oxidant, and an enantiopure dialkyl tartrate as chiral auxiliary accomplishes the epoxidation of allylic alcohols with excellent stereoselectivity. If the reaction is kept absolutely dry, catalytic amounts of the dialkyl tartrate(titanium)(IV) complex are sufficient. 

In order to prevent competing homoallylic asymmetric epoxidation (AE, which, it will be recalled, preferentially delivers the opposite enantiomer to that of the allylic alcohol AE), the primary alcohol in 12 was selectively blocked as a thexyldimethylsilyl ether. Conventional Sharpless AE7 with the oxidant derived from (—)-diethyl tartrate, titanium tetraisopropoxide, and f-butyl hydroperoxide next furnished the anticipated a, [3-epoxy alcohol 13 with excellent stereocontrol (for a more detailed discussion of the Sharpless AE see section 8.4). Selective O-desilylation was then effected with HF-triethylamine complex. The resulting diol was protected as a base-stable O-isopropylidene acetal using 2-methoxypropene and a catalytic quantity of p-toluenesulfonic acid in dimethylformamide (DMF). Note how this blocking protocol was fully compatible with the acid-labile epoxide. 

Let us turn now to the other coupling partner, aldehyde 58 it was synthesised by the pathway shown in Scheme 17.18. The first step was a Sharpless catalytic asymmetric epoxidation on ( )-crotyl alcohol with the oxidant derived from (—)-diethyl tartrate. An in situ derivatisation with r-butyldiphenylsilylchloride was then performed. The desired epoxide 59 was readily isolated in 76% overall yield after chromatography. Treatment of 59 with 2-lithio-l,3-dithiane in THF and 1,3-dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2(l/7)-pyrimidinone (DMPU also known as N,N-... 

---