Detectors suppliers

Type of detector Supplier Detection port no HPLC instrument part no... 

Counting efficiency and background values initially are predicted from measurements by the detector supplier or at other laboratories. Once acceptable levels are confirmed, repeated measurements provide the basis for QC control charts for the check source and background count rates (see Section 11.2.10). Problems are indicated by subsequent QC measurements if values are beyond the control limits, drift toward control limits, or change abruptly. The more frequent the measurement, the sooner a problem can be recognized. 

Type of detector Supplier Detection Part No. HPLC Instrument Part No. 

Table 9.5 Compounds for which colour detector tubes are available from one supplier...

The 1000 A column did not show any resolution between 312 nm and 57 nm particle sizes. Shown in Fig.2 are the calibration curves for the 2000 A and 3000 A columns and for their combination. The 57 nm particle standard appears to have been erroneously characterized by the supplier. This was subsequently confirmed by electron microscopy. The 2000 X column exhibited a sharp upturn in its calibration curve close to the exclusion limit. It is to be noted that while data points corresponding to 312 and 275 nm diameter particles appear on individual column calibration curves, they are not indicated for the calibration curve of the combination. This is because these larger diameter particles were completely retained in the packed colimms, generating no detector response. The percentage recovery for these particles from individual columns was considerably less than 100 resulting in their complete retention when the columns were combined in series. 

Table II shows that for SRM 706 good agreementis obtained between SEC/LALLS and conventional SEC sample My, and Rp values when the band-spreading correction was used. However, the NBS 706 polydispersity index (Ry/Rp) given by the supplier (ca. 2.1) does not agree with that 1.°) found here using the SEC/LALLS and conventional SEC techniques. Insensitivity of the LALLS detector to a small amount of low molecular weight material may account for a larger sample R however, this is not supported by the conventional SEC data. The reason for the discrepancy remains unclear.

Smoke detectors containing americium that are inoperable, damaged, or no longer needed should be returned to the supplier for disposal. 

Parameters that should be tested in HPLC method development are flow rate, column temperature, batch and supplier of the column, injection volume, mobile phase composition and buffer pH, and detection wavelength [2], For GC/GLC methods, one should investigate the effects of column temperature, mobile phase flow rate, and column lots or suppliers [38], For capillary electrophoresis, changes in temperature, buffer pH, ionic strength, buffer concentrations, detector wavelength, rinse times, and capillaries lots and supplier should be studied [35, 36], Typical variation such as extraction time, and stability of the analytical solution should be also evaluated [37],... 

These are available from several suppliers (Table 1.5). ESA supply the model PS 100A coulochem multi-electrode electrochemical detector. Organics, anions and cations can be detected by electrochemical means. 

Figure 1.1 HPLC chromatograms of samples of fluoxetine hydrochloride from four different suppliers (A-D). Reproduced from [7], Reproduced by permission from the publisher and authors. (Column 250 X 4.6 mm i.d. 5 pm Zorbax SB-C8 mobile-phase gradient acetonitrile water triflu-oroacetic 20 80 0.07 for 5 min, to 85 15 0.07 over 25 min, maintain at 85 15 0.07 for 5 min, return to initial conditions over 5 min, re-equilibrate for 10 min flow rate 1 mEmin injection 10 pi of 10 mg/ml solution in the initial mobile phase detector UV 260 nm.)...

Figure 1.9 Use of capillary electrophoresis for the analysis of amoxicillin from four suppliers (a-d). Reprinted from [18], copyright 1994, with permission from Elsevier. (AMOX is amoxicillin, AMP is ampicillin, PENV is penicillin V, DG is a degradant, and 1 and 2 are unspecified impurities. Capillary 80 cm X 50 (tm i.d. [75 cm to detector] [Polymicro Technologies] running buffer 100 mM pH 8 Na2HP04 containing 50 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate and 50 mM sodium borate voltage 18 kV injection at 100 mm for 15 s detector UV 205 nm.)...

Therefore, specific information is required on the characteristics of detectors to allow one to be selected for a particular application. In many cases, however, major performance characteristics of detectors such as noise, sensitivity, response, and linearity, are not presented in a standard format by suppliers. To complicate matters further, there are no published reference values for many of the properties utilized by different detectors for most analytes. Therefore, to determine whether a particular detector is adequate for a particular application, a similar analysis in the pertinent literature has to be found. Ultimately, the analyst will often have to test the detector under consideration on the analyte of interest itself. 

The GECE sensors were used for lead determination in real water samples suspected to be contaminated with lead obtained from water suppliers. The same samples were previously measured by three other methods a potentiometric FIA system with a lead ion-selective-electrode as detector (Pb-ISE) graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICP). The results obtained for lead determination are presented in Table 7.1. The accumulation times are given for each measured sample in the case of DPASV. Calibration plots were used to determine the lead concentration. GEC electrode results were compared with each of the above methods by using paired -Test. The results obtained show that the differences between the results of GECE compared to other methods were not significant. The improvement of the reproducibility of the methods is one of the most important issues in the future research of these materials. 

In order to use commercial reagents in a drug development program, it was important to negotiate and plan with the kit supplier to assure consistency of the Ab reagents, and that sufficient quantities would be reserved. Method robustness included the pre-study validation tests with a second lot of the capture Ab, three analysts, and three batches of radioiodinated detector Ab. Method robustness was further demonstrated by in-study validation, with four additional analysts performing sample analysis using 12 batches of radioiodinated detector Ab over a time span of approximately three years. 

The hydrocarbon or gas detectors used to activate the curtain system should also be calibrated and tested periodically, in accordance with the supplier s recommendations. 

For application as a tracer, a radioisotope is selected on the basis of availability, emitted radiation that can be distinguished from that of the analyte, an appropriately long half-life, and minimal radioactive impurities, including radioactive progeny. As discussed below, the tracer may either be purchased from a supplier as a standard or calibrated in the laboratory. An even safer procedure is to purchase a standard and check its reliability with a calibrated detector. 

At present, the manufacturers listed below deliver reliable instruments with satisfactory working software. The type of instruments and models are not listed because the models change frequently and the software is updated almost annually. Users may select from a variety of beam splitters, detectors, computer memory, and software. The entire spectral range, from the far infrared through the near infrared, is covered by various FTIR instruments. Instrument suppliers include Analect (USA), Bomem (Canada), Bruker (FRG), Bio-Rad, Digilab Division (USA), Mattson (USA), Jasco (Japan), Nicolet (USA), and Perkin-Elmer (UK). Accessory manufacturers include Spectra-Tech Inc. (USA), Specac (UK, USA), Harrick Scientific Corp. (USA), and AAB SPEC (USA). 

This matter took a strange turn when Pressac recently found a document in the KGB archives in Moscow in which the company Topf and Sons confirms the aforementioned order of the gas detectors.41 This document makes reference to the telegram with the words Re.. Crematorium, gas detectors", but in the main text it is mentioned that it had not yet been possible to locate a supplier of indicators of hydrogen cyanide residue . So this document would have us believe that gas detectors were in fact devices for detecting hydrogen cyanide. But several factors ought to make an engineer suspicious ... 

Mp. This is illustrated in Figure 1 in which the response calculated for a LALLS detector (by taking the product of concentration and molecular weight of each slice) is superimposed on the measured MWD (DRI, for the standard labeled Mp == 17,000 by the supplier) from which it was generated. The magnitude of this shift depends both on the MWD of the calibration standard and on the molecular weight dependency of the detector response. 

Figure 1. Comparison of the peak molecular weights for a DRI and LALLS detector for the standard labeled Mp 17,000 by the supplier.

---