Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Danger destruction

In the field of complex systems based on electronic and/or progranmied systems, lEC 61508 ([4]) defines the concept of SIL. SIL is used to quantify the level of system safety. It evolves from 0 (no danger, destruction of equipment), 1 (minor injury), 2 (serious injury), 3 (one death) to 4 (mirltiple deaths). [Pg.63]

Eddy Currents ttike their name from the swirls (eddies) observed in turbulent water flow. The Greek mythology tells us about Charybdis. A monster eddy current between Italy and Sicily whose attractive field pulled unwary sailors to their destruction. Our kind of eddy currents are usually not so dangerous, they flow in electrical conductors and are a branch of Electromagnetics. Where does that spring from Could it make eddy currents the very oldest NDT technique ... [Pg.270]

An HSE inspector has the power under Section 25 to enter any premises where he has reasonable cause to believe that, in the circumstances, any article or substance is a cause of imminent danger of serious personal injury. He may then seize the article or substance and cause it to be rendered harmless, whether by destruction or otherwise. [Pg.95]

Solders are cathodic to steel, zinc and cadmium, and anodic to Monel metal. Although tin or tin-coated metals may be used safely in contact with aluminium when they are not fused with it, a joint in aluminium made with a tin-lead solder is liable to destructive corrosion. The formation, on fusion, of the grain-boundary state, which, as already mentioned, makes aluminium so dangerous an impurity in tin, is responsible. Tin-zinc solders may be used the zinc gives a useful degree of protection. [Pg.807]

The enthalpy of decomposition is now replaced by the enthalpy of reaction to analyse the potential danger. Since the danger of a chemical reaction is usually related to a modification in its procedure, which makes it uncontrollable and causes destruction of the molecular groups, it seems to make more sense to write down the most energetic reaction possible. The risk will indicate the maximum potential danger considering the stoichiometry chosen. This approach may be... [Pg.157]

Can polymerise, but its main danger iies in its propensity to dimerise by the Diels-Alder reaction. This reaction takes piace at a temperature starting at 0-40°C, under pressure, if the dimerisation is not controlled, the storage equipments temperature and pressure rise very quickly, which leads to their destruction. Storage temperatures of -80°C have been recommended. [Pg.238]

Potassium reacts violently with the alcohols used for its destruction. This danger is linked to the fact that the potassium residues to be destroyed are exposed to oxygen and the destruction takes place in air. If the operation is carried out in inert gas and with potassium that is not exposed to air, the reaction is not dangerous. The danger of this reaction comes from the fact that potassium forms a KO2 superoxide easily, which oxidises the alcohol violently. [Pg.254]

When this strained ring opens, this can give rise to polymerisation that can be very dangerous due to exothermicity. Note that it will be very difficult to explain an accident by decomposition leading to the destruction of the molecular structure or polymerisation. [Pg.266]

Oxidation of benzene to phenol. This was attempted in the former U.S.S.R. and Japan on a pilot-plant scale. High yields were reported, but full-scale operation apparently was discontinued because of destruction of product by irradiation and the possibility of explosion in the reaction vessel. The latter danger can be controlled in the oxidation of halo-genated hydrocarbons such as trichloro- or tetrachloroethylenes, where a chain reaction leads to the formation of dichloro- or trichloro-acetic acid chlorides through the respective oxides. [Pg.367]

Unfortunately, the district is unable for the moment to use or destroy this dangerous toxic material. The optimum solution for this issue would be the storage or destruction by such entities that have the respective licenses for performing this kind of work. [Pg.17]

Fallen in the hands of criminals, which as a rule have a very remote notion on the danger of ionizing radiation, radioactive sources become a serious threat for the life and health of the terrorists themselves, as well as of casual persons. And the attempt to extract the ampoule with the radioactive source from its protection block is equal to expose oneself to radiation. Besides, in the event of destruction of the ampoule containing radioactive material, radioactive contamination of a large territory can occur. Such an incident happened already in Taromskoe suburb of Dnepropetrovsk. [Pg.18]

The most dangerous and destructive explosions in the chemical process industries are vapor cloud explosions (VCEs). These explosions occur in a sequence of steps ... [Pg.281]

The use of industrial chemicals with less explosive potential makes the process more intrinsically safe. Most dangerous explosions come from large clouds of flammable material which find an ignition source. Flixborough (Lees, 1996) is an example of the destruction caused by such an incident. [Pg.49]

Packing Group 1—Great Danger Full thickness destruction of human skin (exposure time, 3 min or less observation time, 60 min). [Pg.32]

V I see by your eagerness, and the wonder and hope which your eyes express, my friend, that you expect to be informed of the secret with which I am acquainted that cannot be listen patiendy until the end of my story, and you will easily perceive why I am reserved upon that T subject. I will not lead you on, unguarded and ardent as I then was, to your destruction and infallible misery. Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge, and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his (10) nature will allow. [Pg.142]

The authors of this excellent book provide a concise but comprehensive review of various types of weapons of mass destruction, along with sound advice and simple actions that can be taken by emergency responders and the general public to reduce risks and avoid panic in the event of a terrorist attack. By simply reading through this book, emergency responders and the public will learn what they can do to minimize danger to health and life after an attack. The most important actions are summarized at the end of the book. This summary becomes a convenient checklist. [Pg.6]

If a terrorist attack occurs near an occupied home or office building, the building can provide some level of protection from weapons of mass destruction, assuming its structural integrity is still intact and no imminent danger of fire is present. However, the purity of the air within the building must be maintained. This can be accomplished by ... [Pg.150]


See other pages where Danger destruction is mentioned: [Pg.409]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.749]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.703]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.10]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.35 , Pg.82 , Pg.84 , Pg.90 , Pg.95 , Pg.132 , Pg.139 , Pg.141 , Pg.145 , Pg.159 , Pg.225 , Pg.226 , Pg.228 , Pg.332 , Pg.336 , Pg.369 , Pg.392 ]




SEARCH



Danger destructive process

Dangerous

Dangers

© 2024 chempedia.info