Radical cyclohexyl

The percentage of cyclohexylation is given in Fig. 1-20. (411,412). Hydrogen abstraction from the alkyl side-chain produces, in addition, secondary products resulting from the dimerization of thiazolylalkyl radicals or from their reaction with cyclohexyl radicals (Scheme 68) (411). 

In the case of alkyl radicals [e.g., methyl radical (197, 198) and cyclohexyl radical (198)], their nucleophilic behaviour enhances the reactivity of the 2-position. Here it is necessary to have full protonation of the nitrogen atom and to use specific solvents and radical sources. 

High Peroxide Process. An alternative to maximizing selectivity to KA in the cyclohexane oxidation step is a process which seeks to maximize cyclohexyUiydroperoxide, also called P or CHHP. This peroxide is one of the first intermediates produced in the oxidation of cyclohexane. It is produced when a cyclohexyl radical reacts with an oxygen molecule (78) to form the cyclohexyUiydroperoxy radical. This radical can extract a hydrogen atom from a cyclohexane molecule, to produce CHHP and another cyclohexyl radical, which extends the free-radical reaction chain. 

This result shows than the initially added trichloromethyl group has little influence on the stereochemistry of the subsequent bromine atom-abstraction. The intermediate 2-(trichlor-omethyl)cyclohexyl radical presumably relaxes to the equatorial conformation faster than bromine-atom abstraction occurs. In contrast with addition to A -octahydronaphthalene, the addition is exclusively /ran -diaxial ... 

With the radical 29, even though loss of an equatorial hydrogen should be sterically less hindered and is favored thermodynamically (by relief of 1,3 interactions of the axial methyl), there is an 8-fold preference for loss of the axial hydrogen (at 100 ( i. The selectivity observed in the disproportionation of this and other substituted cyclohexyl radicals led Beckwith18 to propose that disproportionation is subject to stereoelectronic control which results in preferential breaking of the C-H bond which has best overlap with the orbital bearing the unpaired spin. 

Radical cyclization. Ring closure of hept-6-en-1 -y 1 radical yields two products, methyl-cyclohexyl radical (85 percent) and cycloheptyl radical (15 percent).39 The overall rate constant is 3.5 X 104 s l. What are the rate constants for each pathway ... 

Radical addition to conjugated systems is an important part of chain propagation reactions. The rate constants for addition of cyclohexyl radical to conjugated amides have been measured, and shown to be faster than addition to styrene. In additions to RCH=C(CN)2 systems, where the R group has a chiral center, the Felkin-Ahn rule (p. 148) is followed and the reaction proceeds with high selectivity. Addition of some radicals, such as (McsSijaSi-, is reversible and this can lead to poor selectivity or isomerization. ... 

Cyclohexyl radicals react with cyclohexyl hydroperoxide to yield Cyclohexane and the cyclohexyl peroxy radical ... 

The very active unstable tin(III) ion is supposed to play an important role in this chain mechanism of tin(II) oxidation. Cyclohexane, introduced in the system Sn(II) + dioxygen, is oxidized to cyclohexanol as the result of the coupled oxidation of tin and RH. Hydroxyl radicals, which are very strong hydrogen atom acceptors, attack cyclohexane (RH) with the formation of cyclohexyl radicals that participate in the following transformations ... 

The cyclohexadienyl radicals decay by second-order kinetics, as proven by the absorption decay, with almost diffusion-controlled rate (2k = 2.8 x 109 M 1 s 1). The cyclohexyl radicals 3 and 4 decay both in pseudo-first-order bimolecular reaction with the 1,4-cyclohexadiene to give the cyclohexadienyl radical 5 and cyclohexene (or its hydroxy derivative) (equation 15) and in a second order bimolecular reaction of two radicals. The cyclohexene (or its hydroxy derivative) can be formed also in a reaction of radical 3 or... 

The rate data for trapping cyclohexyl radicals depended upon competitive scavenging by tributyltin hydride. In the absence of the hydride, competition for the cylohexyl radicals between the pentamethylnitrosobenzene and the derived nitroxide led to a rate constant of ca. 5 x 1071 mol-1 s 1 for reaction of cyclohexyl radicals with the nitroxide. 

The sequence carbon radical —> imine —> amine is illustrated in equation 30. Irradiation of the pyridinethione 64 (R = cyclohexyl) with the light of a tungsten lamp generates the cyclohexyl radical 65, which was trapped as the imine 67 in the presence of the diazirine 66. The imine was finally hydrolysed to cyclohexylamine80. 

Scheme 123 Reduction of cyclohexyl chloride to cyclohexyl radicals by rhodium (0).

Constant-potential electrolysis of the [Rh(dppe)2]Cl in an MeCN-Bu4NCl04-(Hg) system gives RhH(dppe)2 (325) in ca. 90% yield. When cyclohexyl chloride (334) is added to the [Rh(dppe)2] (332) electrolysis solution, the radical intermediate (335) together with Cl is produced as shown in Scheme (123) [456]. The cyclohexyl radical (335) generated in this manner has several channels for product formation. 

In a systematic study of the addition of cyclohexyl radicals to a-substi-tuted methyl acrylates, Giese (1983) has shown that the captodative-substituted example fits the linear correlation line of log with o-values as perfectly as the other cases studied. Thus, no special character of the captodative-substituted olefin is displayed. More recently, arylthiyl radicals have been added to disubstituted olefins in order to uncover a captodative effect in the rate data (Ito et aL, 1988). Even though a-A, A -dimethyl-aminoacrylonitrile reacts fastest in these additions, this observation cannot per se be interpreted as the manifestation of a captodative effect. Owing to the lack of rate data for the corresponding dicaptor- and didonor-substituted olefins, it is not possible to postulate a special captodative effect. The result confirms only that the A, A -dimethylamino-group, as expected from its a, -value, enhances the addition rate. In the sequence a-alkoxy-, a-chloro-, a-acetoxy- and a-methyl-substituted acrylonitriles, it reacts fastest. 

The interaction of alkyl halides with mercaptans or alkaline mercaptides prodnces thioalkyl derivatives. This is a typical nncleophilic substitution reaction, and one cannot tell by the nature of products whether or not it proceeds through the ion-radical stage. However, the version of the reaction between 5-bromo-5-nitro-l,3-dioxan and sodium ethylmercaptide can be explained only by the intermediate stage involving electron transfer. As found (Zorin et al. 1983), this reaction in DMSO leads to diethyldisulfide (yield 95%), sodium bromide (quantitative yield), and 5,5 -bis(5-nitro-l,3-dioxanyl) (yield 90%). UV irradiation markedly accelerates this reaction, whereas benzene nitro derivatives decelerate it. The result obtained shows that the process begins with the formation of ethylthiyl radicals and anion-radical of the substrate. Ethylthiyl radicals dimerize (diethyldisulfide is obtained), and anion-radicals of the substrate decompose monomolecularly to give 5-nitro-l,3-dioxa-5-cyclohexyl radicals. The latter radicals recombine and form the final dioxanyl (Scheme 4.4). 

In the course of the reaction, the nitrite ion leaves the primary anion-radical. This produces the cyclohexyl radical in the pyramidal configuration. The vicinal methyl group sterically hinders the conversion of the pyramidal radical into the planar one. With a high concentration of the nucleophile, the rate of addition exceeds the rate of conversion, that is, Then the entering PhS group... 

Finally, when we are running out of cyclohexane, the process terminates by the interaction of two radical species, e.g. two chlorine atoms, two cyclohexyl radicals, or one of each species. The combination of two chlorine atoms is probably the least likely of the termination steps, since the Cl-Cl bond would be the weakest of those possible, and it was light-induced fission of this bond that started off the radical reaction. Of course, once we have formed cyclohexyl chloride, there is no reason why this should not itself get drawn into the radical propagation steps, resulting in various dichlorocyclohexane products, or indeed polychlorinated compounds. Chlorination of an alkane will give many different products, even when the amount of chlorine used is limited to molar ratios, and in the laboratory it is not going to be a particularly useful process. 

Cyclobutane and Heterocyclic Analogs, Stereochemistry of (Moriarty) Cyclohexyl Radicals, and Vinylic, The Stereochemistry of (Simamura)... 

Radical cyclization reactions provide a good example of the situation where kinetic and thermodynamic products appear to differ. Cyclization of hex-5-enyl radical can either yield cyclopentylmethyl radical or cyclohexyl radical. 

While cyclohexyl radical would be expected to be thermodynamically more stable than cyclopentylmethyl radical (six-membered rings are less strained than five-membered rings and 2° radicals are favored over 1° radicals), products formed from the latter dominate, e.g. 

We will see in Chapter 19 that calculations show cyclohexyl radical to be about 8 kcal/mol more stable than cyclopentylmethyl radical. Were the reaction under strict thermodynamic control, products derived from cyclopentylmethyl radical should not be observed at all. However, the transition state corresponding to radical attack on the internal double bond carbon (leading to cyclopentylmethyl radical) is about 3 kcal/mol lower in energy than that corresponding to radical attract on the external double bond carbon (leading to cyclohexyl radical). This translates into roughly a 99 1 ratio of major minor products (favoring products derived from cyclopentylmethyl radical) in accord to what is actually observed. The reaction is apparently under kinetic control. 

Organic chemists have a keen eye for what is stable and what is not. For example, they will easily recognize that cyclohexyl radical is more stable than methylcyclopentyl radical, because they know that "6-membered rings are better than 5-membered rings", and (more importantly) that "2° radicals are better than 1° radicals". However, much important chemistry is not controlled by what is most stable (thermodynamics) but rather by what forms most readily (kinetics). For example, loss of bromine from 6-bromohexene leading initially to hex-5-enyl radical, results primarily in product from cyclopentylmethyl radical. ... 

The calculated energy difference is 7.5 kcal/mol in favor of cyclohexyl radical according to the 6-31G calculations. Including the entropy contribution lowers this number to around 5 kcal/mol. Were the reaction under thermodynamic control, only cyclohexane would be observed, and interpretations (b) and (c) cannot be correct. 

---