Cycling of contaminants

C. Barbante, G. Cozzi, G. Capodaglio, A. Gambaro, G. Scarponi, P. Cescon, 6th National Conference on Biogeochemical Cycles of Contaminants, Venice, 27-28 April 1998, Book of Abstracts, 35-40. 

Table 12.5. Chemical characterisation of Antarctic matrices carried out by the research units of the project 2c.4 Biogeochemical Cycles of Contaminants ...

In Table 5-1, the major processes influencing the cycling of contaminants in aquatic systems are arranged according to the primary research discipline involved, and phase (dissolved or particuluate). There are interactions between chemistry and biology in the case of bioturbation, and between chemistry and physics for photodegradation. 

The importance of speciation analysis is beyond any doubt, as has been illustrated in the various chapters of this book. The determination of chemical species is necessary for understanding the bio-geochemical cycle of contaminants in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and for detecting possible harmful substances which might be toxic to biota and humans. Besides the importance of this tool for risk assessment studies, speciation is also highly relevant for testing the quality of products, e.g. the amount of essential elements in food products, or impurities in pharmaceutical products or chemical substances, etc. and is, therefore, of potential interest to industry. 

Once the life-cycle inventory has been quantified, we can attempt to characterize and assess the eflfects of the environmental emissions in a life-cycle impact analysis. While the life-cycle inventory can, in principle at least, be readily assessed, the resulting impact is far from straightforward to assess. Environmental impacts are usually not directly comparable. For example, how do we compare the production of a kilogram of heavy metal sludge waste with the production of a ton of contaminated aqueous waste A comparision of two life cycles is required to pick the preferred life cycle. 

Water Treatment. Water and steam chemistry must be rigorously controlled to prevent deposition of impurities and corrosion of the steam cycle. Deposition on boiler tubing walls reduces heat transfer and can lead to overheating, creep, and eventual failure. Additionally, corrosion can develop under the deposits and lead to failure. If steam is used for chemical processes or as a heat-transfer medium for food and pharmaceutical preparation there are limitations on the additives that may be used. Steam purity requirements set the allowable impurity concentrations for the rest of most cycles. Once contaminants enter the steam, there is no practical way to remove them. Thus all purification must be carried out in the boiler or preboiler part of the cycle. The principal exception is in the case of nuclear steam generators, which require very pure water. These tend to provide steam that is considerably lower in most impurities than the turbine requires. A variety of water treatments are summarized in Table 5. Although the subtieties of water treatment in steam systems are beyond the scope of this article, uses of various additives maybe summarized as follows ... 

Humidity can be a problem. Whereas it was shown (284) that 33% RH was best for spore inactivation, and that at least 30% RH was needed for effective sterilisation (285), dried spores are difficult to kill, and the spore substrate material and wrappings compete with the spore for the available moisture (286). Therefore, the relative humidity is adjusted to 50—70% to provide sufficient moisture for the spores to equiUbrate. The exposure time depends upon the gas mixture, the concentration of ethylene oxide, the load to be sterilised, the level of contamination, and the spore reduction assurance requited. It may be anywhere from 4—24 hours. In a mn, cycles of pre-conditioning and humidification, gassing, exposure, evacuation, and air washing (Fig. 9) are automatically controlled. 

UHV is necessary but not sufficient to ensure an uncontaminated surface. Certainly, the surface will not be contaminated by atoms arriving from the vacuum space, but such contamination as it had before the vacuum was formed has to be removed by bombardment with argon ions. This damages the surface structurally, and that has to be healed by in situ heat treatment. That, however, allows dissolved impurities to diffuse to the surface and cause contamination from below. This problem has to be dealt with by many cycles of bombardment and annealing, until the internal contaminants are exhausted. This is a convincing example of Murphy s Law in action one of the many corollaries of the Law is that new systems generate new problems . 

Although a proper cycling procedure has been used between alternate beds, an unexpected contamination of the adsorbent would cause a premature breakthrough of the beds resulting in the release of contaminants. A routine shutdown would normally only involve the shut off of the gas flow from the process. 

Fig. 8.1 shows a diagram of a chemical absorption process described by Chiesa and Consonni [1], for removal of CO2 from the exhaust of a natural gas-fired combined cycle plant (in op>en or semi-closed versions). The process is favoured by low temp>erature which increases the CO2 solubility, and ensures that the gas is free of contaminants which would impair the solvent properties. 

Where acid process contaminant or acidic water ingress occurs, the bulk BW pH may quickly drop as low as 5.0. This may occur, for example, where there is only limited alkaline buffering of BW because of low cycles of concentration and/or high-purity FW. Where acidic incursions occur, a general thinning of the boiler tubes, drums, and shell rapidly takes place, giving rise to a clearly visible irregular surface. 

Carryover is the term for BW (containing some level of contaminant) that is entrained in the steam and passes into the steam header and main distribution lines. Carryover is always detrimental to the steam cycle process and produces problems of ... 

A + B + C) = sum of individual FW contaminant substrates X respective chelant demand for specific chelant employed BW chelant residual — typically 3 to 5 ppm COC — Cycles of FW concentration present or desired in the BW... 

Waldron MC, Cohnan JA, and BreaultRF. 2000. Distribution, hydrologic transport, and cycling of total mercury and methyl mercury in a contaminated river-reservoir-wetland system (Sudbury River, eastern Massachusetts), Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57 1080-1091. 

Practically wastewater reuse in another cleaning cycle can only be done in steps two, three and four. The water from the first step has a very high contaminant concentration, and reuse of this water in another cleaning operation would not achieve significant wastewater reductions. The wastewater from the other three steps has relatively low concentrations of contaminants and reuse of the water is feasible. In the application of the derived methodologies to the case study, the last three steps were modelled as one processing step. 

Analysis, Fate and Removal of Pharmaceuticals in the Water Cycle Food Contaminants and Residue Analysis Protein Mass Spectrometry... 

McIntosh A.W., Shephard B.K., Mayes R.A., Atchison G.J., Nelson D.W. Some aspects of sediment distribution and macrophyte cycling of heavy metals in a contaminated lake. JEnvironQual 1978 7 301-305. 

Capdeville MJ (2011) Study of the biogeochemical cycles of emerging contaminants in aquatic ecosystems. University of Bordeaux, France... 

---