Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Critical micelle concentration thermodynamics

Micelles the mostly spherical nanoscale aggregates formed by amphiphilic compounds above their critical micelle concentration in aqueous solution have a narrow size distribution and are dynamic, because there is a fast exchange of amphiphiles in solution and those incorporated in micelles. However, micelles are defined as self-assembled structures, since the structure is in thermodynamical equilibrium. [Pg.188]

The critical concentration at which the first micelle forms is called the critical micelle concentration, or CMC. As the concentration of block copolymer chains increases in the solution, more micelles are formed while the concentration of nonassociated chains, called unimers, remains constant and is equal to the value of the CMC. This ideal situation corresponds to a system at thermodynamic equilibrium. However, experimental investigations on the CMC have revealed that its value depends on the method used for its determination. Therefore, it seems more reasonable to define phenomenologically the CMC as the concentration at which a sufficient number of micelles is formed to be detected by a given method [16]. In practical terms, the CMC is often determined from plots of the surface tension as a function of the logarithm of the concentration. The CMC is then defined as the concentration at which the surface tension stops decreasing and reaches a plateau value. [Pg.82]

Therefore, the physical meaning of the solubility curve of a surfactant is different from that of ordinary substances. Above the critical micelle concentration the thermodynamic functions, for example, the partial molar free energy, the activity, the enthalpy, remain more or less constant. For that reason, micelle formation can be considered as the formation of a new phase. Therefore, the Krafft Point depends on a complicated three phase equilibrium. [Pg.4]

The surface tension of the aqueous solution of dode-cylaitunonium chloride (DAC) — decylairanonium chloride (DeAC) mixture was measured as a function of the total molality m of surfactants and the mole fraction X of DeAC in the total surfactant in the neighborhood of the critical micelle concentration (CMC). By use of the thermodynamic equations derived previously, the mole fraction in the mixed adsorbed film was evaluated from the y vs. X and m vs. X curves. Further, the mole fraction in the mixed micelle was evaluated from the CMC vs. X curve. By comparing these values at the CMC, it was concluded that the behavior of DAC and DeAC molecules in the mixed micelle is fairly similar to that in the mixed adsorbed film. [Pg.163]

On the other hand, we showed that the coii5>osition of surfactant in a mixed adsorbed film can be estimated thermodynamically from experimental results without introducing such a supposition (9-11). Further, the composition of a mixed micelle was calculated assuming that the micelle behaves thermodynamically like a macroscopic bulk phase whose thermodynamic quantities are given by the excess thermodynamic quantities similar to those used for the adsorbed film (i8). Therefore, we can now compare the composition of surfactant in the mixed adsorbed film with that in the mixed micelle at the critical micelle concentration (CMC). [Pg.163]

The mixed admicelle is very analogous to mixed micelles, the thermodynamics of formation of which has been widely studied. If the surfactant mixing in the micelle can be described by ideal solution theory, the Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) or minimum concentration at which micelles first form can be described by (21) ... [Pg.204]

Critical Micelle Concentration. In order to demonstrate the analogy between our treatment of mixed adsorption and earlier treatments of mixed micellization, we will briefly review the thermodynamics of mixed micelles. The thermodynamics of formation of ideal mixed micelles by two surfactants has been treated by Lange and Beck (9 ) and Cling (10). Rubingh ( ) extended the treatment to account for interactions between the surfactants, essentially by writing the cmc in the mixed surfactant solution as. [Pg.232]

The simplest way in which a process occurs by itself is when it is under thermodynamic control. The folding of a protein, or the self-assembly of micelles at the critical micelle concentration (cmc) are examples of spontaneous processes the latter are characterized by a negative free-energy change, as the self-orgaiuzed product has a lower energy than the single components. ... [Pg.86]

The enthalpy change associated with formation of a thermodynamically ideal solution is equal to zero. Therefore any heat change measured in a mixing calorimetry experiment is a direct indicator of the interactions in the system (Prigogine and Defay, 1954). For a simple biopolymer solution, calorimetric measurements can be conveniently made using titra-tion/flow calorimeter equipment. For example, from isothermal titration calorimetry of solutions of bovine P-casein, Portnaya et al. (2006) have determined the association behaviour, the critical micelle concentration (CMC), and the enthalpy of (de)micellization. [Pg.148]

In contrast to the above-described kinetic stability, colloids may also be thermodynamically stable. A stable macromolecular solution is an example we have already discussed. Formation of micelles beyond the critical micelle concentration is another example of the formation of a thermodynamically stable colloidal phase. However, when the concentration of the (say, initially spherical) micelles increases with addition of surfactants to the system, the spherical micelles may become thermodynamically unstable and may form other forms of (thermodynamically stable) surfactant assemblies of more complex shapes (such as cylindrical micelles, liquid-crystalline phases, bilayers, etc.). [Pg.18]

This chapter is organized as follows. The thermodynamics of the critical micelle concentration are considered in Section 3.2. Section 3.3 is concerned with a summary of experiments characterizing micellization in block copolymers, and tables are used to provide a summary of some of the studies from the vast literature. Theories for dilute block copolymer solutions are described in Section 3.4, including both scaling models and mean field theories. Computer simulations of block copolymer micelles are discussed in Section 3.5. Micellization of ionic block copolymers is described in Section 3.6. Several methods for the study of dynamics in block copolymer solutions are sketched in Section 3.7. Finally, Section 3.8 is concerned with adsorption of block copolymers at the liquid interface. [Pg.132]

Micelles are formed by association of molecules in a selective solvent above a critical micelle concentration (one). Since micelles are a thermodynamically stable system at equilibrium, it has been suggested (Chu and Zhou 1996) that association is a more appropriate term than aggregation, which usually refers to the non-equilibrium growth of colloidal particles into clusters. There are two possible models for the association of molecules into micelles (Elias 1972,1973 Tuzar and Kratochvil 1976). In the first, termed open association, there is a continuous distribution of micelles containing 1,2,3,..., n molecules, with an associated continuous series of equilibrium constants. However, the model of open association does not lead to a cmc. Since a cmc is observed for block copolymer micelles, the model of closed association is applicable. However, as pointed out by Elias (1973), the cmc does not correspond to a thermodynamic property of the system, it can simply be defined phenomenologically as the concentration at which a sufficient number of micelles is formed to be detected by a given method. Thermodynamically, closed association corresponds to an equilibrium between molecules (unimers), A, and micelles, Ap, containingp molecules ... [Pg.133]

Menger et al. synthesized a Ci4H29-attached copper(II) complex 3 that possessed a remarkable catalytic activity in the hydrolysis of diphenyl 4-nitrophenyl phosphate (DNP) and the nerve gas Soman (see Scheme 2) [21], When 3 was used in great excess (ca. 1.5 mM, which is more than the critical micelle concentration of 0.18 mM), the hydrolysis of DNP (0.04 mM) was more than 200 times faster than with an equivalent concentration of the nonmicellar homo-logue, the Cu2+-tetramethylethylenediamine complex 9, at 25°C and pH 6 (Scheme 4). The DNP half-life is calculated to be 17 sec with excess 1.5 mM 3 at 25°C and pH 6. The possible reasons for the rate acceleration with 3 were the enhanced electrophilicity of the micellized copper(II) ion or the acidity of the Cu2+-bound water and an intramolecular type of reaction due to the micellar formation. On the basis of the pH(6-8.3)-insensitive rates, Cu2+-OH species 3b (generated with pK3 < 6) was postulated to be an active catalytic species. In this study, the stability constants for 3 and 9 and the thermodynamic pvalue of the Cu2+-bound water for 3a —> 3b + H+ were not measured, probably because of complexity and/or instability of the metal compounds. Therefore, the question remains as to whether or not 3b is the only active species in the reaction solution. Despite the lack of a detailed reaction mechanism, 3 seems to be the best detoxifying reagent documented in the literature. [Pg.38]

One of the most frequently varied parameters is the temperature of the system The obvious reason for such measurements was to determine thermodynamic properties of the system, for example, the enthalpy of micellization from the temperature dependence of the critical micelle concentration (CMC) using the well-known relation... [Pg.120]

The characteristic effect of surfactants is their ability to adsorb onto surfaces and to modify the surface properties. Both at gas/liquid and at liquid/liquid interfaces, this leads to a reduction of the surface tension and the interfacial tension, respectively. Generally, nonionic surfactants have a lower surface tension than ionic surfactants for the same alkyl chain length and concentration. The reason for this is the repulsive interaction of ionic surfactants within the charged adsorption layer which leads to a lower surface coverage than for the non-ionic surfactants. In detergent formulations, this repulsive interaction can be reduced by the presence of electrolytes which compress the electrical double layer and therefore increase the adsorption density of the anionic surfactants. Beyond a certain concentration, termed the critical micelle concentration (cmc), the formation of thermodynamically stable micellar aggregates can be observed in the bulk phase. These micelles are thermodynamically stable and in equilibrium with the monomers in the solution. They are characteristic of the ability of surfactants to solubilise hydrophobic substances. [Pg.54]

A number of statistical thermodynamic theories for the domain formation in block and graft copolymers have been formulated on the basis of this idea. The pioneering work in this area was done by Meier (43). In his original work, however, he assumed that the boundary between the two phases is sharp. Leary and Williams (43,44) were the first to recognize that the interphase must be diffuse and has finite thickness. Kawai and co-workers (31) treated the problem from the point of view of micelle formation. As the solvent evaporates from a block copolymer solution, a critical micelle concentration is reached. At this point, the domains are formed and are assumed to undergo no further change with continued solvent evaporation. Minimum free energies for an AB-type block copolymer were computed this way. [Pg.190]

The beginning of Region IV may or may not coincide with the critical micelle concentration (CMC). When it does, once micelles begin to form the thermodynamic activity of the surfactant rises only very slowly with further increases of surfactant concentration. Hence, the isotherm becomes essentially level for an extended range of surfactant concentration. The adsorbed surfactant is thought to form a bilayer, with polar groups towards both the solid and the solution. [Pg.26]

The adsorption of binary mixtures of anionic surfactants of a homologous series (sodium octyl sulfate and sodium dodecyl sulfate) on alpha aluminum oxide was measured. A thermodynamic model was developed to describe ideal mixed admicelle (adsorbed surfactant bilayer) formation, for concentrations between the critical admicelle concentration and the critical micelle concentration. Specific... [Pg.205]

The surface tension of a solution of a surfactant is lower than that of the pure solvent. Surface tension is roughly a linear function of ln(surfactant concentration) up to the critical micelle concentration (CMC) (Figure 3). Above the CMC the thermodynamic activity of the surfactant does not increase with the addition of more surfactant, and the surface tension remains constant. Interfacial tension also decreases with the concentration of an emulsifier dissolved in one of the phases. In Figure 4 the decrease in y does not level off, because the emulsifier (PGMS) does not form micelles in the organic solvent phase (heptane). The changes in the slope of the plot are attributed to changes in orientation of emulsifier molecules at the interface (7). [Pg.2205]

Solubilization can be defined as the preparation of a thermodynamically stable isotropic solution of a substance normally insoluble or very slightly soluble in a given solvent by the introduction of an additional amphiphilic component or components. The amphiphilic components (surfactants) must be introduced at a concentration at or above their critical micelle concentrations. Simple micellar systems (and reverse micellar) as well as liquid crystalline phases and vesicles referred to above are all capable of solubilization. In liquid crystalline phases and vesicles, a ternary system is formed on incorporation of the solubilizate and thus these anisotropic systems are not strictly in accordance with the definition given above. [Pg.3587]


See other pages where Critical micelle concentration thermodynamics is mentioned: [Pg.147]    [Pg.2063]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.1821]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.2222]    [Pg.836]    [Pg.2236]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.802]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.695]    [Pg.344]   


SEARCH



Critical concentration

Critical micell concentration

Critical micelle concentration

Critical micelle concentration micellization

Critical micellization concentrations

Micelle concentration

Micelles critical micelle concentration

Micellization thermodynamics

Thermodynamic concentration

© 2024 chempedia.info