Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Corrosion current-potential relationship

Figure 1.62b shows the result of raising the potential of a corroding metal. As the potential is raised above B, the current/potential relationship is defined by the line BD, the continuation of the local cell anodic polarisation curve, AB. The corrosion rate of an anodically polarised metal can very seldom be related quantitatively by Faraday s law to the external current flowing, Instead, the measured corrosion rate will usually exceed... [Pg.214]

A good starting point is the basic picture of corrosion by local-cell action, according to which a corroding metal consists of electron-sink areas at which metal dissolution takes place and electron-source areas at which an electronation reaction occurs. Under conditions where there is an exponential current-potential relationship... [Pg.168]

Figure 8 Current-potential relationship for a corrosion process, showing the separation of the anodic and cathodic half-reactions by polarization to positive and negative potentials, respectively. Figure 8 Current-potential relationship for a corrosion process, showing the separation of the anodic and cathodic half-reactions by polarization to positive and negative potentials, respectively.
However, since this corrosion reaction is short-circuited on the corroding surface, no current will flow in any external measuring circuit. Consequently, a direct electrochemical measurement of the corrosion current (convertible to corrosion rate by the application of Faraday s law) cannot be made. Despite this limitation, electrochemical techniques can be used to decouple the two half-reactions, thereby enabling each to be separately and quantitatively studied. This involves the determination of the current-potential relationships for each half-reaction. Subsequently, the behavior under electrochemically unperturbed (open-circuit or natural corrosion) conditions can be reconstructed by extrapolation of these relationships to Ecorr-... [Pg.214]

With the aid of electrochemical tests [DIN 50918] quantiative statements can be made about the corrosion mechanism. The experimental determination of the current-potential relationship provides the most important information. It can be used to determine the limiting potentials for the occurrence of, for example, pitting corrosion and stress corrosion cracking. [Pg.232]

Kaesche and Hackerman (13) have investigated the inhibition of several aliphatic and aromatic amines on pure iron corroding in IN hydrochloric acid. These authors observed in thirteen out of fourteen cases that the inhibition was both anodic and cathodic, albeit predominantly anodic. The exception was methylamine which acted only cathodically. In the case of the corrosion inhibition on pure iron by B-naphthoquinoline in sodium sulfate/sulfuric acid solution (13). one observes a simple parallel shift of the anodic and cathodic Tafel lines towards smaller values of current density. Here the effect is almost symetrical, indicating that this inhibitor acts to the same extent upon anodic and cathodic reaction rates. Therefore, the effect of B-naphthoquinoline can be explained on the basis that its adsorption blocks a fraction 0 of the metal surface for all electrode reactions. If equation 9 describes the external polarization behavior in terms of a function of the partial current potential relationship for the anodic and cathodic reactions in the usual terms ... [Pg.279]

Conservation of energy requires no net accumulation of electrical charge during any corrosion reaction. Thus, the total rate of oxidation is always equal to the total rate of reduction [4-7]. The conservation of energy is explained through the current-potential relationship shown in Fig. 5.2. In this figure, the equilibrium potentials of the redox reactions are labeled as Ceq M and Equilibrium potentials of both cathode and anode... [Pg.185]

Where, W is weight loss (mg), A is area of the specimen (cm ), D is density of the specimen (gm/cm ), T is exposure time (hours) and unit pm/year is micro-metre/year. Indirect methods of corrosion rate measurement involve anodic/ cathodic reaction, consideration of current potential relationship or polarisation resistance values. Tafel extrapolation method is the most popular laboratory methods for measuring corrosion rate of a metal from electrochemical data in a corrosive medium. [Pg.20]

In order to explain the corrosion process of metals, Wagner and Traud [54] developed the mixed potential theory, which assumes that the current-potential relationship is given by... [Pg.568]

Oxidation and reduction processes are accompanied by the flow of electric charge through the interface metal-corrosive environment. In metals the charge carriers are electrons while in the corrosive environment charge flow is due to ions. Thus an active assessment of electrochemical corrosion processes can be achieved by assessing the electrical charge transfer process. In the reactions of corrosion that are controlled by the rate of charge transfer, the current - potential relationship can be described by the Butler-Vokner equation ... [Pg.398]

Potentiodynamic polarization method was ap>plied to a wide range of potential changes to characterize the current-potential relationship j = f(E) in corrosion systems under investigation. The corrosion current density jcor and potential Ecor of tested metallic materials were further determined based on extrapolation of tangents to the curves of the cathodic and anodic polarization zones. [Pg.400]

Indirect methods of corrosion rate measurement involve aspects of the electrochemical process other than metal dissolution. These measurements involve cathodic reactions, such as the evolution of hydrogen, or consider current-potential relationships, such as polarization curves or polarization resistance values. [Pg.276]

Electrochemical methods are not usually carried out in the absence of a reference electrode. However, for the rapid screening of multifunctional corrosion inhibitors, the omission of the reference electrode offers the benefit of simplicity whilst retaining the key information regarding inhibition. Figure 9.5 demonstrates the current-potential relationship upon the application of a potential across two electrodes. [Pg.158]

When the sweep rate is very low, in the range of v = (0.1—5) mVs , measurement is conducted under quasi-steady-state conditions. The sweep rate plays no role in this case, except that it must be slow enough to ensure that the reaction is effectively at steady state along the course of the sweep. This type of measurement is widely used in corrosion and passivation studies, as we shall see, and also in the study of some fuel cell reactions in stirred solutions. Reversing the direction of the sweep should have no effect on the current-potential relationship, if the sweep is slow enough. Deviations occur sometimes as a result of slow formation and/or reduction of surface oxides or passive layers. Because the sweep rate is slow, the potential is often swept only in one direction, and the experiment is then referred to as linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). [Pg.221]

Evans Diagram diagram in which the E vs. I relationships for the cathodic and anodic reactions of a corrosion reaction are drawn as straight lines intersecting at the corrosion potential, thus indicating the corrosion current associated with the reaction. [Pg.1368]

At 60 minutes only, dc potentiodynamic curves were determined from which the corrosion current was obtained by extrapolation of the anodic Tafel slope to the corrosion potential. The anodic Tafel slope b was generally between 70 to 80 mV whereas the cathodic curve continuously increased to a limiting diffusion current. The curves supported impedance data in indicating the presence of charge transfer and mass transfer control processes. The measurements at 60 minutes indicated a linear relationship between and 0 of slope 21mV. This confirmed that charge transfer impedance could be used to provide a measure of the corrosion rate at intermediate exposure times and these values are summarised in Table 1. [Pg.21]

Corrosion current density — Anodic metal dissolution is compensated electronically by a cathodic process, like cathodic hydrogen evolution or oxygen reduction. These processes follow the exponential current density-potential relationship of the - Butler-Volmer equation in case of their charge transfer control or they may be transport controlled (- diffusion or - migration). At the -> rest potential Er both - current densities have the same value with opposite sign and compensate each other with a zero current density in the outer electronic circuit. In this case the rest potential is a -> mixed potential. This metal dissolution is related to the corro-... [Pg.116]

Linear polarization measurements are executed rapidly. The currents in linear polarization measurements are measured in the potential range between 10 and 20 mV from the equilibrium potential. The E-I dependence in this potential range follows a linear relationship. The slope of the plot, dE/ di, represents the polarization resistance. The corrosion current is calculated using the Stem-Geary equation for known values of the anodic and cathodic Tafel slopes. The ratio of the overpotential to the current represents the resistance in Ohm s law and is often termed the charge transfer resistance or the polarization resistance, Rp. [Pg.24]


See other pages where Corrosion current-potential relationship is mentioned: [Pg.483]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.2430]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.2185]    [Pg.2694]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.2671]    [Pg.2434]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.1618]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.14]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.293 ]




SEARCH



Corrosion current

Corrosion potential

Corrosive current

Corrosive potential

Current potential relationship

Potential Relationship

© 2024 chempedia.info