Feedback corrective

The entire cycle of volcanoes to atmosphere to rock weathering to soil bacteria to ocean animals to limestone sediments and back to volcanoes acts as a giant feedback loop to regulate atmospheric CO and the Earth s temperature. As the temperature increases, bacterial action and shell formation increases, thus acting in a self-correcting feedback mode. Wonderful indeed ... 

The overall implication of the study is that when the risk expert or rather risk expertise is studied in its institutional setting, as a part of a network dependent on efficient commimication channels for corrective feedback, the rationahty of risk expertise becomes a questionable fact. On the one hand it becomes dubious to label the risk expertise of the present study as rational, knowing that important information concerning risks is never reported. On the other hand one might... 

Physiologically correct feedback, beyond drat provided by vision, is essential if low mental loading or coordinated subconscious control of multifunctional prostheses is to be achieved (Pig. 32.33). When prosthetic aim technology moved to externally powered systems, the control modalities shifted, with the exception of Simpson (1974) and a few others, from the position-based cable control of the body-powered systems to open-loop velocity control techniques (such as myoelectric and switch control). That is, prosthetic technology shifted away from cable inputs, which provide sensory... 

There are usually many more opportunities for confirming feedback than for correcting feedback. In either case the feedback should be very specific. Vague feedback, such as Good job or Be more careful, has no place in safety coaching. 

As always, faculty assume that students capability to give correct feedback is in question. 

A suitable group of people through proper consultation is providing the solution, and selection team is receiving correct feedback of information from others so that proper selection is made. 

Equation and Symbolic answer types so that the results of a self-derivation can be entered to check for correctness, feedback, and assistance... 

It is difficult to maintain. Punishment-based efforts are difficult to maintain. Audits that may result in punishment are not fun for those doing the audits or for those being audited. Managers do not like punishing employees, and employees do not like being punished. Corrective feedback is almost always punishing, regardless of the method or severity of its delivery. 

To repeat, punishment is like a drug that produces an immediate high. It works, and it works immediately. Because punishment is so effective, we can easily get hooked on its use. In many of our relationships, both at work and at home, the immediate outcome can cause us to become overcritical and pay undue attention to problems and actions that irritate us. Our relationships can get puUed out of balance, and we may come to rely too heavily on criticism and corrective feedback. 

When giving feedback, a three-step feedback process works equally well for both positive and corrective feedback ... 

Listen to what the employee has to say and then, for corrective feedback, make a specific suggestion that pinpoints what he or she should be doing differently. 

In traditional safety management, the most common added consequence is the threat of punishment. It can take the form of corrective feedback, criticism, nagging, or disciplinary action. Employees follow the safety procedures to escape from or avoid punishment. 

The behavioral safety process also provides additional corrective feedback from observers. But the observers are more likely to be peers and the corrective feedback does not have the same threat of performance evaluation included in the traditional approach to safety. 

The observation process provides social consequences for safe practices through the feedback that observers provide to those they observe. The positive feedback provided immediately following observations of safe practices should reinforce those practices, while corrective feedback should prompt safe practices and decrease the likelihood of future unsafe practices. 

Practical solution Redesign the job so that negative consequences are built into the task. Ensure observers and supervisors are monitoring and providing corrective feedback on the safe practice. Ensure disciplinary action is taken when appropriate. 

Similar cards can also facilitate corrective feedback. Cards for this purpose may take several forms. Some companies provide a number of corrective feedback cards to employees to use independently of the observation process, with the idea that they pass them on to other employees who they see are working unsafely. Other cards make a personal statement, such as Asking me to look the other way is like asking me not care, and you are much too important or Asking me to overlook a simple safety violation would be like asking me to compromise my entire attitude toward the value of your life. ... 

Second, trainer Anne provided feedback to the workers several times a day during checkout times. She praised workers when she observed them performing the desired work behavior and when their work area met the housekeeping goals. If a worker did not perform the desired work practice, Anne provided corrective feedback to tell the worker WHAT was being done incorrectly, WHY it was important that it be done correctly, and HOW the recommended work practice would solve the problem. After a few minutes, she returned and praised the worker for engaging in the desired behavior. 

Because at-risk behaviors contribute to most if not all injuries, a Total Safety Culture requires a decrease in at-risk behaviors. Organizations have attempted to do this by targeting at-risk acts, exclusive of safe acts, and using corrective feedback, reprimands, or disciplinary action to motivate behavior change. This approach is useful, but less proactive and less apt to be widely accepted than a behavior-based approach that emphasizes... 

If some employees are not sure of the safe way to perform a certain job, behavioral direction is needed. A global "percent safe score" is not sufficient. When the CBC is reviewed during a one-on-one coaching session, behavioral direction is provided. The worker sees what critical behaviors were observed as "safe" and "at-risk." A constructive conversation with the coach provides support for safe behavior and corrective feedback for behavior that could be safer. Often this includes suggestions for making the safe behavior more convenient, comfortable, and easier to remember. It might also include tire removal of barriers (physical and social) that inhibit safe behavior. 

Sometimes we talk to ourselves after performing a behavior in order to reassure ourselves we performed it correctly or we figure out ways to do better next time. At this point, we are usually open to corrective feedback that is delivered well. 

Simply put, "intrinsic" does not mean "inside" people, where it cannot be observed, measured, and directly influenced (Horcones, 1987). Rather, intrinsic refers to the nature of the task in which an individual is engaged. Intrinsically motivated tasks, or behaviors, lead naturally to external consequences that support the behavior (rewarding feedback) or give information useful for improving the behavior (corrective feedback). 

Sometimes, it is necessary to offer constructive criticism or even state extreme displeasure with another person s behavior. However, if such negative discomse occurs on an "overdrawn or bankrupt account," this corrective feedback will have limited impact. In fact, continued withdrawals from an overdrawn account can lead to defensive or coimtercontrol reactions (Skiimer, 1974). The person will simply ignore the communication or actually do things to discredit the somce or undermine the process or system implicated in the communication. 

People need to understand that anyone can be at risk without even realizing it, as in "unconscious incompetence," and performance can only improve with behavior-specific feedback. Once this fact is established, corrective feedback that is appropriately given will be appreciated, regardless of who is giving the feedback. Work status is not a factor. 

Individual feedback. Whether the aim is to support or correct, feedback should be specific and timely. It should specify a particular behavior and occur soon after the target... 

---