Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction rate, diffusion controlled limit

Diffusion rate limited (first-order kinetics). In this case, the reaction rate is controlled by the rate of diffusion of the pollutant species into the biofilm. [Pg.2193]

Most radicals are transient species. They (e.%. 1-10) decay by self-reaction with rates at or close to the diffusion-controlled limit (Section 1.4). This situation also pertains in conventional radical polymerization. Certain radicals, however, have thermodynamic stability, kinetic stability (persistence) or both that is conferred by appropriate substitution. Some well-known examples of stable radicals are diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH), nitroxides such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-A -oxyl (TEMPO), triphenylniethyl radical (13) and galvinoxyl (14). Some examples of carbon-centered radicals which are persistent but which do not have intrinsic thermodynamic stability are shown in Section 1.4.3.2. These radicals (DPPH, TEMPO, 13, 14) are comparatively stable in isolation as solids or in solution and either do not react or react very slowly with compounds usually thought of as substrates for radical reactions. They may, nonetheless, react with less stable radicals at close to diffusion controlled rates. In polymer synthesis these species find use as inhibitors (to stabilize monomers against polymerization or to quench radical reactions - Section 5,3.1) and as reversible termination agents (in living radical polymerization - Section 9.3). [Pg.14]

The last comprehensive review of reactions between carbon-centered radicals appeared in 1973.142 Rate constants for radical-radical reactions in the liquid phase have been tabulated by Griller.14 The area has also been reviewed by Alfassi114 and Moad and Solomon.145 Radical-radical reactions arc, in general, very exothermic and activation barriers are extremely small even for highly resonance-stabilized radicals. As a consequence, reaction rate constants often approach the diffusion-controlled limit (typically -109 M 1 s"1). [Pg.36]

Where large samples of reactant are used and/or where C02 withdrawal is not rapid or complete, the rates of calcite decomposition can be controlled by the rate of heat transfer [748] or C02 removal [749], Draper [748] has shown that the shapes of a—time curves can be altered by varying the reactant geometry and supply of heat to the reactant mass. Under the conditions used, heat flow, rather than product escape, was identified as rate-limiting. Using large ( 100 g) samples, Hills [749] concluded that the reaction rate was controlled by both the diffusion of heat to the interface and C02 from it. The proposed models were consistent with independently measured values of the transport parameters [750—752] whether these results are transfenable to small samples is questionable. [Pg.171]

The signal-to-noise ratio is usually too low to be useful unless the full light intensity is used. To circumvent this difficulty, it can be assumed, provided the radicals are unhindered, that all the self-reactions will occur at the same rate that is ku = k 2 = k22. Moreover, this rate will be at the diffusion-controlled limit, about 6 x 109 L mol-1 s 1 in aqueous solutions at room temperature, and in the range 109 to... [Pg.109]

A minor component, if truly minute, can be discounted as the reactive form. To continue with this example, were KCrQ very, very small, then the bimolecular rate constant would need to be impossibly large to compensate. The maximum rate constant of a bimolecular reaction is limited by the encounter frequency of the solutes. In water at 298 K, the limit is 1010 L mol-1 s"1, the diffusion-controlled limit. This value is derived in Section 9.2. For our immediate purposes, we note that one can discount any proposed bimolecular step with a rate constant that would exceed the diffusion-controlled limit. [Pg.134]

Rate constants that are near the diffusion-controlled limit may need to have a correction applied, if they are to be compared with others that are slower. To see this, consider a two-step scheme. In the first, diffusion together and apart occur the second step is the unimolecular reaction within the solvent cage. We represent this as... [Pg.201]

A characteristic reaction of free radicals is the bimolecular self-reaction which, in many cases, proceeds at the diffusion-controlled limit or close to it, although the reversible coupling of free radicals in solution to yield diamagnetic dimers has been found to be a common feature of several classes of relatively stable organic radicals. Unfortunatly, only the rate constants for self-termination of (CH3)jCSO (6 x 10 M s at 173 K) and (CH3CH2)2NS0 (1.1 X 10 M s at 163K) have been measured up to date by kinetic ESR spectroscopy and consequently not many mechanistic conclusions can be reached. [Pg.1084]

Reactive intermediates in solution and in the gas phase tend to be indiscriminant and ineffective for synthetic applications, which require highly selective processes. As reaction rates are often limited by bimolecular diffusion and conformational motion, it is not surprising that most strategies to control and exploit their reactivity are based on structural modihcations that influence their conformational equilibrium, or by taking advantage of the microenvironment where their formation and reactions take place, including molecular crystals. ... [Pg.304]

These reactions had similar rate constants, 4 x 109 dm3 mol-1 second-1, which approached the diffusion-controlled limit. Thus, for 10-2 M concentration of added ligand the half-life of Cr(CO)5 would be 17 nseconds. Interest in these experiments has been reawakened by the recent reports of photoactivation of alkanes by metal carbonyl species 34). [Pg.281]

Information about the kinetics of interconversion of the species in Scheme 12 has been obtained (Smith et al., 1981). The values of the rate coefficients for external protonation of ii to give io+ and o+o+ are probably close to the diffusion-controlled limit. However, the rate of internal monoprotonation of ii to ii+ is quite low and the reaction can be followed by observing the change in nmr signals with time. At pH 1 and 25°C the half-life is 7 min. Under these conditions, insertion of the second proton into the cavity takes several weeks to reach completion, but can be observed in convenient times at higher... [Pg.188]

In the presence of oxygen, SO generates the peroxomonosulfate anion radical (Eq. (91)) in a reaction step with a rate constant close to the diffusion controlled limiting value on the order of 1.0 x 109 to 2.5 x 109 M-1 s-1 (81,82) ... [Pg.433]

Very recently, rate constants for scavenging of hydroxyl radicals by DMPO, and by the nitrone [18c], have been determined (Marriott et al., 1980) (see Table 5). As might be expected, the figures are close to the diffusion-controlled limit. The report of this work includes a concise and informative discussion of some of the difficulties with, and limitations of, the spin trapping method, especially where these relate to reactions involving hydroxyl radicals. [Pg.53]

In both the above cases, we have 2D processes. Following nucleation, the reaction may be either phase boimdary controlled (i.e. the rate is limited by the rate at which the interlayer space expands to accommodate the guest) or diffusion controlled (i.e. the reaction rate is controlled by the rate at which the guests diffuse between the layers - the interlayer spacing expands instantly as the guests move). [Pg.165]

A quantitative expression developed by Albery and Knowles to describe the effectiveness of a catalyst in accelerating a chemical reaction. The function, which depends on magnitude of the rate constants describing individual steps in the reaction, reaches a limiting value of unity when the reaction rate is controlled by diffusion. For the interconversion of dihydroxacetone phosphate and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, the efficiency function equals 2.5 x 10 for a simple carboxylate catalyst in a nonenzymic process and 0.6 for the enzyme-catalyzed process. Albery and Knowles suggest that evolution has produced a nearly perfect catalyst in the form of triose-phosphate isomerase. See Reaction Coordinate Diagram... [Pg.220]

In general, the lower the activation energy the faster the reaction. In the limit of a zero barrier , reaction rate will be limited entirely by how rapidly molecules can move. Such limiting reactions have come to be known as diffusion controlled reactions. [Pg.11]

Rate constants for the reaction of each purine nucleoside, fcnuc, were estimated based on the known values of kj for 75n and 75o that had previously been determined under identical solvent and temperature conditions. The results indicate that k uc levels off at ca. 2.0 x 10 M s for the most reactive purine nucleosides (Table 3). It was suggested that this was the approximate diffusion-controlled limit for reaction of these ions with purine nucleosides. [Pg.219]

The reaction proceeds with a rate constant in excess of 109 M Y secrl approaching the diffusion controlled limit and implying that substitution of a sixth ligand into the coordination shell of Co(CN)5 3 is an extremely rapid process. [Pg.51]

The second type of polarization, concentration polarization, results from the depletion of ions at the electrode surface as the reaction proceeds. A concentration gradient builds up between the electrode surface and the bulk solution, and the reaction rate is controlled by the rate of diffusion of ions from the bulk to the electrode surface. Hence, the limiting current under concentration polarization, ii, is proportional to the diffusion coefficient for the reacting ion, D (see Section 4.0 and 4.3 for more information on the diffusion coefficient) ... [Pg.230]

Reactions analogous to reaction (27) for methyl radicals were observed for a variety of complexes. The product of these reactions is ethane. Table IV presents a summary of their rates of reaction. As can be seen these rates are often fast, approaching the diffusion-controlled limit. The results for the homolytic decomposition of L2Cun-CH2CH2C02 suggest that steric hindrance slows down reaction (27) considerably (92). [Pg.287]


See other pages where Reaction rate, diffusion controlled limit is mentioned: [Pg.931]    [Pg.931]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.2421]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.1084]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.666]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.84]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.462 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.462 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.462 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.462 ]




SEARCH



Control limit

Controller Control limits

Controller limitations

Controls controller limitations

Controls limitations

Diffusion control

Diffusion control limit

Diffusion control rates

Diffusion controlled

Diffusion controlled reaction rates

Diffusion limit

Diffusion limit rates

Diffusion limitation

Diffusion limiting

Diffusion rate

Diffusion rate controlling

Diffusion reaction control

Diffusion reactions

Diffusion-controlled limit on reaction rate

Diffusion-controlled rate

Diffusion-controlled reactions

Diffusive limit

Diffusivity reactions

Limiting diffusivity

Rate control

Rate controlling

Rate limitations

Rate limiting

Rate-controlled reaction

Rate-limiting diffusion

Rate-limiting reactions

Reaction limit

Reaction limitation

Reaction rates controlling

© 2024 chempedia.info