Control functions optimal

In the context of chemometrics, optimization refers to the use of estimated parameters to control and optimize the outcome of experiments. Given a model that relates input variables to the output of a system, it is possible to find the set of inputs that optimizes the output. The system to be optimized may pertain to any type of analytical process, such as increasing resolution in hplc separations, increasing sensitivity in atomic emission spectrometry by controlling fuel and oxidant flow rates (14), or even in industrial processes, to optimize yield of a reaction as a function of input variables, temperature, pressure, and reactant concentration. The outputs ate the dependent variables, usually quantities such as instmment response, yield of a reaction, and resolution, and the input, or independent, variables are typically quantities like instmment settings, reaction conditions, or experimental media. 

In some cases, calculating the optimal fields explicitly is inconvenient, either for computational reasons, or because the quantity to be optimized cannot be expressed in terms of a simple control functional. In such situations alternative procedures can be applied. One method is to express the laser field E t) as a function of a small number of parameters, and then vary the parameters to maximize the yield. For example, the laser field can be written... 

Physiology is the study of the functions of the human body. In other words, the mechanisms by which the various organs and tissues carry out their specific activities are considered. Emphasis is often placed on the processes that control and regulate these functions. In order for the body to function optimally, conditions within the body, referred to as the internal environment, must be very carefully regulated. Therefore, many important variables, such as body temperature, blood pressure, blood glucose, oxygen and carbon dioxide content of the blood, as well as electrolyte balance, are actively maintained within narrow physiological limits. 

In all of these cases what is established is the existence of a control field that will minimize the objective functional /. If the value of the minimum attained is zero, the system is completely controllable if not, the optimal solution defines the maximum attainable control of the evolution of the system for the given set of control functions. 

Below we show how the energy-optimal control of chaos can be solved via a statistical analysis of fluctuational trajectories of a chaotic system in the presence of small random perturbations. This approach is based on an analogy between the variational formulations of both problems [165] the problem of the energy-optimal control of chaos and the problem of stability of a weakly randomly perturbed chaotic attractor. One of the key points of the approach is the identification of the optimal control function as an optimal fluctuational force [165],... 

We emphasize that the question of stability of a CA under small random perturbations is in itself an important unsolved problem in the theory of fluctuations [92-94] and the difficulties in solving it are similar to those mentioned above. Thus it is unclear at first glance how an analogy between these two unsolved problems could be of any help. However, as already noted above, the new method for statistical analysis of fluctuational trajectories [60,62,95,112] based on the prehistory probability distribution allows direct experimental insight into the almost deterministic dynamics of fluctuations in the limit of small noise intensity. Using this techique, it turns out to be possible to verify experimentally the existence of a unique solution, to identify the boundary condition on a CA, and to find an accurate approximation of the optimal control function. 

We have considered the following energy-optimal control problem. The system (35) with unconstrained control function u t) is to be steered from a CA... 

Here it is assumed that the optimal control function u(t) at each instant takes those values u(t) = p2 that maximize Hc over U. 

The basins of attraction of the coexisting CA (strange attractor) and SC are shown in the Fig. 14 for the Poincare crosssection oyf = O.67t(mod27t) in the absence of noise [169]. The value of the maximal Lyapunov exponent for the CA is 0.0449. The presence of the control function effectively doubles the dimension of the phase space (compare (35) and (37)) and changes its geometry. In the extended phase space the attractor is connected to the basin of attraction of the stable limit cycle via an unstable invariant manifold. It is precisely the complexity of the structure of the phase space of the auxiliary Hamiltonian system (37) near the nonhyperbolic attractor that makes it difficult to solve the energy-optimal control problem. 

To find an approximation to the optimal control function we collect all successful realizations (qfc(t),qfc(t), J esc(f)) that move it from the CA to 0fl. An approximate solution u(t) is then found as an ensemble average over the corresponding realizations of the random force l c c(t)) (the exact solution is u t) = lim/) o u t)). The results of this procedure are shown in the upper trace of Fig. 18. To remove the irrelevant high-frequency component left after averaging, we filtered through a zero-phase low-pass filter with frequency cutoff coc = 1.9. 

Here we examine the control of migration in a periodically driven nonlinear oscillator. Our aim is to demonstrate that application of the approximate solution found from the statistical analysis of fluctuational trajectories optimizes (minimizes) the energy of the control function. We compare the performance of some known adaptive control algorithms to that of the control function found through our analysis. 

The energy of the control functions obtained by these methods varies from 0.14 to 0.6 and thus it is more then one order of magnitude larger then the energy of the optimal control function u(t) found by our new technique, (see Fig. 19). Similar results were obtained using the algorithm for adaptive chaos control [151] for the migration of the nonlinear oscillator from the CA to SC (see Fig. 19). 

We note that neither the OPCL nor the adaptive control algorithms were devised to optimize the energy of the control, but rather the recovery time. It is clear that these methods are insensitive to the initial conditions at the CA. The shapes of the control functions are, to a large extent, also prescribed by the algorithms and are not optimized. In this sense the high energy of the control functions is not a surprise the results presented serve the purpose of illustrating the main point the sensitivity of the optimal control to the shape of the control function and to the initial conditions, discussed above. 

The PC can also be interfaced to a DCS to perform advanced control or optimization functions that are not available within the standard DCS function library. 

Optimization implies maximum profit rate. An objective function is selected, and manipulated variables are chosen that will maximize or minimize that function. Unit optimization addresses several columns in series or parallel. It is concerned with the effective allocation of feedstocks and energy among the members of that system. Plantwide optimization involves coordinating the control of distillation units, furnaces, compressors, etc., to maximize profit from the entire operation. All lower-level control functions respond to set points received from higher-level optimizers. 

Having design parameters fixed in the outer problem and with a specific choice of D° (discussed in section 7.2) the inner loop optimisation can be partitioned into M independent sequences (one for each mixture) of NTm dynamic optimisation problems. This will result to a total of ND = 2 NTm problems. In each (one for each task) problem the control vector m for each task is optimised. This can be clearly explained with reference to Figure 7.3 which shows separation of M (=2) mixtures (mixture 1 = ternary and mixture 2 = binary) and number of tasks involved in each separation duty (3 tasks for mixture 1 and 2 tasks for mixture 2). Therefore, there are 5 (= ND) independent inner loop optimal control problems. In each task a parameterisation of the time varying control vector into a number of control intervals (typically 1-4) is used, so that a finite number of parameters is obtained to represent the control functions. Mujtaba and Macchietto (1996) used a piecewise constant approximation to the reflux ratio profile, yielding two optimisation parameters (a control level and interval length) for each control interval. For any task i in operation m the inner loop optimisation problem (problem Pl-i) can be stated as ... 

The equivalence of tuned PID controllers and optimal controllers can be demonstrated by augmentation of the state vector and judicious selection of the objective function (47), (48) ordinarily an optimal feedback controller contains higher order derivative terms, yielding significant phase advance (which can cause noise amplification and controller saturation). 

A general approach to the analysis of low amplitude periodic operation based on the so-called Il-criterion is described in Refs. 11. The shape of the optimal control function can be found numerically using an algorithm by Horn and Lin [12]. In Refs. 9 and 13, this technique was extended to the simultaneous optimization of a forcing function shape and cycle period. The technique is based on periodic solution of the original system for state variables coupled with the solution of equations for adjoin variables [Aj, A2,..., A ], These adjoin equations are... 

For such starchy foods as noodles, cakes, pastries, processed potato food, and puddings, lipids improve the texture. The tendency of bread to staling is also related to the presence of lipids and emulsifiers. In order to satisfy market demands, it is important to optimize the water-binding capacity, the rate of water sorption, and the swelling power. The effects of lipids on these properties is under ongoing study. The mode of application of lipids is also a factor which controls functional properties.851-853 869 The effect of all these factors on bread quality has been recognized.870-873... 

A bioelectrode functioning optimally has a short response time, which is often controlled by the thickness of the immmobilized enzyme layer rather than by the sensor as well as many other factors (see Table 7). The biosensor response time depends on (1) how rapidly the substrate diffuses through the solution to the membrane surface, (2) how rapidly the substrate diffuses through the membrane cmd reacts with the biocatalyst at the active site, and (3) how rapidly the products formed diffuse to the electrode surface where they are measured. Mathematical models describing this effea are thoroughly presented in the biosensor literature (5, 68). 

Anticrease treatments consist in the controlled functionalization and crosslinking of the protcic or cellulosic macromolecules of fibers. This topic has been already discussed (Sec. A.2, Chap. Ill, C.2, and Fig. 179, Chap. IV), but a very accurate study" of N,N -bis-methylol ureides (594 and 595), which stresses the importance of a well-balanced hydrophilic power among these additives, is worth mentioning. The appropriate choice of either of the above products, or the use of a mixture of both, in fact permits a. satisfactory optimization of the results. 

---