Continuous flow reactors continuously stirred tank

Copolymers are typically manufactured using weU-mixed continuous-stirred tank reactor (cstr) processes, where the lack of composition drift does not cause loss of transparency. SAN copolymers prepared in batch or continuous plug-flow processes, on the other hand, are typically hazy on account of composition drift. SAN copolymers with as Httle as 4% by wt difference in acrylonitrile composition are immiscible (44). SAN is extremely incompatible with PS as Httle as 50 ppm of PS contamination in SAN causes haze. Copolymers with over 30 wt % acrylonitrile are available and have good barrier properties. If the acrylonitrile content of the copolymer is increased to >40 wt %, the copolymer becomes ductile. These copolymers also constitute the rigid matrix phase of the ABS engineering plastics. 

Experimental data taken from the chlorination of toluene in a continuous stirred tank flow reactor at 111°C and irradiated with light of 500 nm wavelength yield a product distribution shown in Table 1 (1). 

Reactor types modeled A, stoichiometric conversion B, equiUbrium/free-energy minimization, continuous stirred tank, and plug flow C, reactive distillation. Some vendors have special models for special reactions also, private company simulators usually have reactors of specific interest to their company. 

Over 25 years ago the coking factor of the radiant coil was empirically correlated to operating conditions (48). It has been assumed that the mass transfer of coke precursors from the bulk of the gas to the walls was controlling the rate of deposition (39). Kinetic models (24,49,50) were developed based on the chemical reaction at the wall as a controlling step. Bench-scale data (51—53) appear to indicate that a chemical reaction controls. However, flow regimes of bench-scale reactors are so different from the commercial furnaces that scale-up of bench-scale results caimot be confidently appHed to commercial furnaces. For example. Figure 3 shows the coke deposited on a controlled cylindrical specimen in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and the rate of coke deposition. The deposition rate decreases with time and attains a pseudo steady value. Though this is achieved in a matter of rninutes in bench-scale reactors, it takes a few days in a commercial furnace. 

A useful classification of lands of reaclors is in terms of their concentration distributions. The concentration profiles of certain limiting cases are illustrated in Fig. 7-3 namely, of batch reactors, continuously stirred tanks, and tubular flow reactors. Basic types of flow reactors are illustrated in Fig. 7-4. Many others, employing granular catalysts and for multiphase reactions, are illustratea throughout Sec. 23. The present material deals with the sizes, performances and heat effects of these ideal types. They afford standards of comparison. 

CONTINUOUS FLOW ISOTHERMAL PERFECTLY STIRRED TANK REACTOR... 

There are three idealized flow reactors fed-batch or semibatch, continuously stirred tank, and the plug flow tubular. Each of these is pictured in Figure 1. The fed-batch and continuously stirred reactors are both taken as being well mixed. This means that there is no spatial dependence in the concentration variables for each of the components. At any point within the reactor, each component has the same concentration as it does anywhere else. The consequence... 

Continuous Stirred Tank and the Plug Flow Reactors... 

Frequently, stirred tanks are used with a continuous flow of material in on one side of the tank and with a continuous outflow from the other. A particular application is the use of the tank as a continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR). Inevitably, there will be a vety wide range of residence times for elements of fluid in the tank. Even if the mixing is so rapid that the contents of the tank are always virtually uniform in composition, some elements of fluid will almost immediately flow to the outlet point and others will continue circulating in the tank for a very long period before leaving. The mean residence time of fluid in the tank is given by ... 

Continuous reactors fall into two categories, plug flow, which includes fixed-bed reactors, and mixed flow, usually a continuous stirred tank reactor. 

Based on the kinetic mechanism and using the parameter values, one can analyze the continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) as well as the dispersed plug flow reactor (PFR) in which the reaction between ethylene and cyclopentadiene takes place. The steady state mass balance equations maybe expressed by using the usual notation as follows ... 

Choose the right type of reactor for testing There are quite a number of different reactors. The above-mentioned plug flow reactor and the continuously stirred tank reactor are usually preferred for research laboratory use, but other set-ups may also be of interest for simulating real industrial conditions. 

Establish ideal flow patterns This is usually assumed to be the case for plug-flow and continuously stirred tank reactors, but are all conditions for ideal mixing fulfilled For example, a rule of thumb is that the diameter d of the PFR should be at least lOx the diameter of the catalyst particles to eliminate the influence of the reactor wall. Also, the amount of catalyst should be sufficient to avoid axial gradients. Another rule is that the ratio of the bed length L to the reactor diameter d, i.e. L/d, should be >5-10. Higher values are preferable, but these may cause other problems such as temperature gradients and pressure drops. 

As will be shown later the equation above is identical to the mass balance equation for a continuous stirred-tank reactor. The recycle can be provided either by an external pump as shown in Fig. 5.4-18 or by an impeller installed within the reaction chamber. The latter design was proposed by Weychert and Trela (1968). A commercial and advantageously modified version of such a reactor has been developed by Berty (1974, 1979), see Fig. 5.4-19. In these reactors, the relative velocity between the catalyst particles and the fluid phases is incretised without increasing the overall feed and outlet flow rates. 

Key PFR = Plug Flow Reactor, BSTR = Batch Stirred-Tank Reactor, (S)BSTR = (Semi)Batch Stirred -Tank Reactor, SBSTR = Semibatch Stirred-Tank Reactor, CSTR = Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor, TBR = Trickle-Bed Reactor. 

If the process is carried out in a stirred batch reactor (SBR) or in a plug-flow reactor (PFR) the final product will always be the mixture of both products, i.e. the selectivity will be less than one. Contrary to this, the selectivity in a continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) can approach one. A selectivity equal to one, however, can only be achieved in an infinite time. In order to reach a high selectivity the mean residence time must be very long, and, consequently, the productivity of the reactor will be very low. A compromise must be made between selectivity and productivity. This is always a choice based upon economics. 

A cascade of three continuous stirred-tank reactors arranged in series, is used to carry out an exothermic, first-order chemical reaction. The reactors are jacketed for cooling water, and the flow of water through the cooling jackets is countercurrent to that of the reaction. A variety of control schemes can be employed and are of great importance, since the reactor scheme shows a multiplicity of possible stable operating points. This example is taken from the paper of Mukesh and Rao (1977). 

In a typical test 750 mg of catalyst was added to a continuous stirred tank reactor containing the nitrate ions in 1 L of phosphate buffer solution. This suspension contained 85% H3PO4 (331 g), NaNOs (198 g), NaOH (84g), and Ge02 dissolved in water and was stirred under a H2 flow of 150 L/h. The amonnt of hyam formed and selectivity after 90 min at 30°C were measured by titration [2-3]. Catalysts A and C were also chosen for stndying the effect of Pd loading and Pt addition. 

The esterification process can be carried out in either batch or continuous mode, the final decision depending most likely on the size of the flow rates involved. For most commercial sizes of 15 MM gal/yr or higher, the continuous process is probably more cost effective and for this option, two additional options are available continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) or a fixed-bed reactor (FBR). 

In the second model (Figure 5.1b), the mixed-flow or continuous well-mixed or continuous-stirred-tank (CSTR) model, feed and product takeoff are both continuous, and the reactor contents are assumed to be perfectly mixed. This leads to uniform composition and temperature throughout the reactor. Because of the perfect mixing, a fluid element can leave the instant it enters the reactor or stay for an extended period. The residence time of individual fluid elements in the reactor varies. 

The depolymerized Nylon used in the hydrogenation process was obtained by the ammonolysis of a mixture of Nylon-6 and Nylon-6,6 (described elsewhere, see reference 2). Hydrogenation reactions were conducted in 300 cc stirred pressure vessels. For semi-batch reactions hydrogen was constantly replenished to the reactor from a 1L reservoir to maintain a reactor pressure of 500 psig and all of the reactions were conducted with the same operating parameters and protocol. In continuous stirred tank studies hydrogen flow was controlled using... 

---