Continuous flow method, data analysis

Advantages and Disadvantages 41 Specific Batch Techniques 42 Data Analysis 46 Flow and Stirred-Flow Methods 46 Advantages and Disadvantages 46 Continuous Flow Method 48 Fluidized Bed Reactors 50 Stirred-Flow Technique 51... 

The CONTINUOUS FLOW method doses adsorptive onto the sample at a constant and pre-determined flow rate which is low enough to enable quasi-equilibration to occur. The flexibility of this technique is enhanced through the use of a mass flow controller,as is used in the OMNISORP instruments. Rouquerol et al (3) have shown that no appreciable difference is found in the isotherms when compared to static method if the correct mass flow controller setting is used. They also describe how this setting can be confirmed. Theoretically resolution with this method is infinite in practice it is normally unnecessary to exceed 1000 data points but the great advantage of this method is that it is fast. Analysis times are usually significantly less than with the static method. 

Since 1970, new analytical techniques, eg, ion chromatography, have been developed, and others, eg, atomic absorption and emission, have been improved (1—5). Detection limits for many chemicals have been dramatically lowered. Many wet chemical methods have been automated and are controlled by microprocessors which allow greater data output in a shorter time. Perhaps the best known continuous-flow analy2er for water analysis is the Autoanaly2er system manufactured by Technicon Instmments Corp. (Tarrytown, N.Y.) (6). Isolation of samples is maintained by pumping air bubbles into the flow line. Recently, flow-injection analysis has also become popular, and a theoretical comparison of it with the segmented flow analy2er has been made (7—9). 

The coupling of HPLC with NMR represents a powerful method for the high-throughput screening of peptides in mixtures run in stop-flow and continuous-flow modes. It is possible to obtain routine high-quality HPLC/NMR ID NMR data with as little as 5 pg of compound in a chromatogram peak. However, the HPLC/NMR technique cannot be favorably compared to mass spectrometry techniques (HPLC/MS) in terms of sensitivity and speed of analysis. To date, the majority of reports of the use of HPLC/NMR have been for drug metabolites.1 ... 

On-flow HPLC-NMR analysis can also be performed when sufficient material is available. It involves collecting the NMR data continuously as the sample passes through the probe. This is the most efficient method for stmcture evaluation by HPLC-NMR. The NMR data are represented in a 2-D plot where the x direction contains chemical shift information and they direction is representative of the LC retention time. The individual spectra can be extracted from the ID slices along the x axis if so desired. The resolutions in the individual spectra are of somewhat lower quality than in the stop-flow method however, the introduction of the second dimension allows for easy stmcture assignment even for overlapping peaks in the LC separation. As seen in Fig. 19, the on-flow HPLC-NMR characterization shows four distinct sets of resonances. 

The stirred-flow method is an integration of the best characteristics of continuous-how methods with the ability of batch methods to overcome diffusion effects. The system consists of a reaction chamber that can be stirred magnetically and is ported such that experimental solution can be howed thorough the reaction volume and hltered upon exiting the cell. Therefore, the system does not lose any particulate material and the experimental solution can be fraction collected for analysis. The only drawback with this method is the restricted data collection time (Sparks et al., 1996 Sparks, 1999, 2002). 

In this study, the reaction was characterized using a combination of in-situ kinetic probes, heat flow from reaction calorimetry and measurement of the hydrogen uptake rate, in addition to the commonly-used method of analysis of samples taken from the reactor. Heat flow from the reaction calorimetry and measurement of rate of hydrogen uptake are intrinsically superior kinetic tools in that they both provide rate data directly and in a quasi-continuous fashion. Consequently, they are capable of producing clear and detailed kinetic pictures which offers hints on reaction pathways and mechanism (4,5). It will be shown that thermodynamic information regarding each step in the hydrogenation reaction network may also be obtained directly from a combination of the heat flow and the hydrogen uptake data. 

For each parameter, the pH, DO (dissolved oxygen), ORP (oxidation-reduction potential), temperature, agitation speed, culture volume and pressure can be measured with sensors located in the fermenter. The output of the individual sensors is accepted by the computer for the on-line, continuous and real-time data analysis. Information stored in the computer control system then regulates the gas flow valves and the motors to the feed pumps. A model of a computer control system is shown in Fig. 11. The computer control systems, like the batch systems for mammalian cell culture, seem to level out at a maximum cell density of 10 cells/ml. It may be impossible for the batch culture method to solve the several limiting factors (Table 10) that set into high density culture where the levels are less than 10 cells/ml. 

UV-Visible absorption spectrometry is the most commonly used method in modem enzymatic analysis. Suitable spectrometers are found in every laboratory, and many analyses use simple, robust, relatively cheap instruments. The availability of disposable polystyrene or acrylic cuvettes is a further advantage for conventional solution studies, but many analyses now use microtiter plates, the individual wells of which can be examined in a simple spectrometer. Continuous flow systems are also simple to set up. Most spectrometers are interfaced with personal computers, which offer a range of control and data handling options. 

Monomer conversion has traditionally been determined gravitimetrically by drying emulsion samples to constant weight. The procedure is slow, requiring several hours for analysis, and precludes automated data acquisition. A new method has been developed based on the DMA-series digital densitometers manufactured by Anton Paar of Austria, and marketed in the United States by Mettier Instrument Corporation. (Very recently Dr. Kirk Abbey made us aware of his parallel work in these directions and of some initial data reported from his laboratory [1, 2]). This instrument is capable of immediate determination of the density of any test fluid, and, if equipped with a flow cell, can continuously monitor the density of a process stream. Results are displayed locally and can be transmitted digitally to a data acquisition computer. 

---