Contamination method development

Scotter, M.J., Castle, C., Roberts, D., Method development and HPLC analysis of retail foods and beverages for copper chlorophyll (E141[i]) and chlorophyllin (E14[ii]) food colouring materials. Food Additives and Contaminants, 22,1163, 2005. 

Nguyen, T.H., Sabbah, I. Ball, W.P. (2004) Sorption nonlinearity for organic contaminants with diesel soot method development and isotherm interpretation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 3593-3603. 

The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure may be subject to misinterpretation if the compounds under investigation are not included in the methods development or the list of contaminants leading to the potential for technically invalid results. However, an alternative procedure, the synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP, EPA SW-846 Method 1312) may be appropriate. This procedure is applicable for materials where the leaching potential due to normal rainfall is to be determined. Instead of the leachate simulating acetic acid mixture, nitric and sulfuric acids are utilized in an effort to simulate the acid rains resulting from airborne nitric and sulfuric oxides. 

The overall method includes sample collection and storage, extraction, and analysis steps. Sampling strategy is an important step in the overall process. Care must be taken to assure that the samples collected are representative of the environmental medium and that they are collected without contamination. There is an extensive list of test methods for water analysis (Tables 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4), which includes numerous modifications of the original methods, but most involve alternative extraction methods developed to improve overall method performance for the analysis. Solvent extraction methods with hexane are also in use. 

What is the reason for the overwhelming acceptance of stationary phases based on high-purity silicas in the pharmaceutical industry The answer is simple superior peak shapes for analytes with basic functional groups, which has been a problem with older phases. The older, low-purity silicas contain metal ions buried in the matrix of the silica. These contaminants acidify the surface silanols, and the consequence is a strong and non-uniform interaction with basic analytes. This in turn results in tailing peaks, which is an impediment for accurate peak integration and peak resolution. Of course, adding appropriate additives, such as amine modifiers, to the mobile phase can solve these difficulties. But this is an unnecessary and undesired complication in methods development. Therefore, silicas that are free from this complication are much preferred. 

The compatibility of the chromatographic system with aqueous biological fluids (urine, serum), and the direct analysis of highly polar compounds with no need for hydrolysis and derivatization allow to reduce sample manipulation and the probability of artifact formation/analyte degrada-tion/contamination. In addition, the possibility of carrying out separate LC and MS experiments accounts for rapid and cost-effective method development. These features are highly considered in the forensic field where often the analyst is requested to deal with the setup of a method for an unusual analyte or substrate. 

The most widely accepted method of evaluating the accuracy and precision of an analytical procedure is to sample known concentrations of contaminants in the atmosphere. Thus an important aspect of analytical method development is the generation of test atmospheres that simulate the conditions (i.e., concentration range, humidity, temperature and interferences) found during the field sampling. 

The studies with sediment cultures indicate natural degradation potential for aquatic sediments exposed to anthropogenic CP pollution. However, in situ remediation rates for CP-contaminated sediments may be difficult to enhance. Possibilities involve nutrient and electron donor/acceptor amendments. Ex situ remediation could involve sediment dredging and application of methods developed for soil decontamination, such as slurry reactors and composting. 

Cytology, that is, the visual inspection of exfoliated cells, is most commonly carried out for smears of cells, which are deposited ( smeared ) directly from brushes, spatulas or other exfoliation devices onto microscope slides. Such smears are unsuitable for spectral analysis, since they contain clumps of cells, cellular debris, erythrocytes and other contamination. However, better methods of cell slide preparations have been introduced into cytology, among them the ThinPrep methods developed by Cytyc, Inc. (see ref. 7), and spin centrifugation deposition techniques. These methods are very good for real exfoliated cell samples,7 since they permit the purification of the cell exfoliate, enrichment in the cells desired for analysis and produce good monolayers for visual cell inspection. 

There is a second kind of sample, which is hardly ever found in a real-life method development laboratory. That is the sample one knows everything about Even if this might seem to be the case, it is good to be aware of the possibility that unexpected components may be present in the sample. These may include contaminants, side products, degradation products, metabolites, etc.. 

During methods development or when you wish or need to stretch the buffer, set up two methods where the inlet and outlet vials are reversed. If you alternate between the two methods, the pH-changing depletion effects are effectively canceled and you can get many runs out of a set of buffers. Eventually the vials become sufficiently contaminated that baseline upsets occur. 

---