Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Consumption of analyte

When a substrate can be directly measured, the reason for using an enzymatic assay for its quantitation may not be immediately apparent. However, complex biological media matrices may contain a variety of species that interfere with the direct measurement of analyte concentration. For example, if the analyte absorbs in the visible (vis) or ultraviolet (UV) region, direct quantitation may result in erroneously high values if interfering species absorb at the measurement wavelength. An enzymatic method, on the other hand, can monitor the absorbance decrease that occurs as a result of the selective consumption of analyte by the enzyme, thus avoiding the spectral interference. [Pg.42]

Voltammetry is based on the measurement of current in an electrochemical cell under conditions of complete concentration polarization in which the rate of oxidation or reduction of the analyte is limited by the rate of mass transfer of the analyte to the electrode surface. Voltammetry differs from electrogravimetry and coidometry in that in the latter tw o methods, measures are taken to minimize or compensate for the effects of concentration polarization. Furthermore, in voltammetry a minimal consumption of analyte takes place, whereas in electrogravimetry and coidometry essentially all of the analyte is converted to product. [Pg.665]

The analytical method described is also used in following the consumption of peroxybenzoic acid or other peroxy acids during an oxidation reaction it has also been used in determining the conversion of other carboxylic acids to peroxy acids when solvent extraction has been used in the isolation. [Pg.95]

Bones J, Thomas KV, Pauli B (2007) Using environmental analytical data to estimate levels of community consumption of illicit dmgs and abused pharmaceuticals. J Environ Monit 9 (7) 701-707... [Pg.224]

A number of methods are available for following the oxidative behaviour of food samples. The consumption of oxygen and the ESR detection of radicals, either directly or indirectly by spin trapping, can be used to follow the initial steps during oxidation (Andersen and Skibsted, 2002). The formation of primary oxidation products, such as hydroperoxides and conjugated dienes, and secondary oxidation products (carbohydrides, carbonyl compounds and acids) in the case of lipid oxidation, can be quantified by several standard chemical and physical analytical methods (Armstrong, 1998 Horwitz, 2000). [Pg.331]

The definitions of method detection and quantification limits should be reliable and applicable to a variety of extraction procedures and analytical methods. The issue is of particular importance to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and also pesticide regulatory and health agencies around the world in risk assessment. The critical question central to risk assessment is assessing the risk posed to a human being from the consumption of foods treated with pesticides, when the amount of the residue present in the food product is reported nondetect (ND) or no detectable residues . [Pg.60]

Principles and Characteristics Although early published methods using SPE for sample preparation avoided use of GC because of the reported lack of cleanliness of the extraction device, SPE-GC is now a mature technique. Off-line SPE-GC is well documented [62,63] but less attractive, mainly in terms of analyte detectability (only an aliquot of the extract is injected into the chromatograph), precision, miniaturisation and automation, and solvent consumption. The interface of SPE with GC consists of a transfer capillary introduced into a retention gap via an on-column injector. Automated SPE may be interfaced to GC-MS using a PTV injector for large-volume injection [64]. LVI actually is the basic and critical step in any SPE-to-GC transfer of analytes. Suitable solvents for LVI-GC include pentane, hexane, methyl- and ethylacetate, and diethyl or methyl-f-butyl ether. Large-volume PTV permits injection of some 100 iL of sample extract, a 100-fold increase compared to conventional GC injection. Consequently, detection limits can be improved by a factor of 100, without... [Pg.436]

Consumption of sweet chocolate in the U.S. is low. The majority of chocolate consumed is milk chocolate produced from chocolate liquor, sugar, cocoa butter, and milk solids. Because most milk chocolate produced in the U.S. contains 10 to 12% chocolate liquor, differences in methylxanthine content among commercial milk chocolate are due more to the varieties and blends of cocoa bean (Table 9). Based on analytical data from seven brands of commercial milk chocolate, a typical 40-g milk chocolate bar contains approximately 65 mg theobromine and less than 10 mg caffeine.28 Milk chocolate bars containing other ingredients, such as peanuts, almonds, and confectionery fillings, obviously contain less methylxanthines. In a survey of 49 marketed chocolate and confectionery products, theobromine concentrations ranged from 0.001 to 2.598% and caffeine content from 0.001 to 0.247%.33... [Pg.185]

Capillary electrophoresis has also been combined with other analytical methods like mass spectrometry, NMR, Raman, and infrared spectroscopy in order to combine the separation speed, high resolving power and minimum sample consumption of capillary electrophoresis with the selectivity and structural information provided by the other techniques [6]. [Pg.241]

Another possibility is to immobilise enzymes either on the sensor element itself or in the vicinity of the sensing element. The operation principle is in most cases a semi-continuous spectral difference measurement in combination with a kinetic data evaluation. A sample containing the analyte of interest is recorded by the sensor immediately after contact with the sample and again after a certain time. Provided that no other changes in the composition of the sample occur over time, the spectral differences between the two measurements are characteristic for the analyte (and the metabolic products of the enzymatic reaction) and can quantitatively evaluated. Provided that suitable enzymes are available that can be immobilised, this may be a viable option to build a sensor, in particular when the enzymatic reaction can not (easily) be monitored otherwise, e.g. by production or consumption of oxygen or a change of pH. In any case, the specific properties and stumbling blocks related to enzymatic systems must be observed (see chapter 16). [Pg.141]

The analytical phase generally involves the use of very dilute solutions and a relatively high ratio of oxidant to substrate. Solutions of a concentration of 0.01 M to 0.001 M (in periodate ion) should be employed in an excess of two to three hundred percent (of oxidant) over the expected consumption, in order to elicit a valid value for the selective oxidation. This value can best be determined by timed measurements of the oxidant consumption, followed by the construction of a rate curve as previously described. If extensive overoxidation occurs, measures should be taken to minimize it, in order that the break in the curve may be recognized, and, thence, the true consumption of oxidant. After the reaction has, as far as possible, been brought under control, the analytical determination of certain simple reaction-products (such as total acid, formaldehyde, carbon dioxide, and ammonia) often aids in revealing what the reacting structures actually were. When possible, these values should be determined at timed intervals and be plotted as a rate curve. A very useful tool in this type of investigation, particularly when applied to carbohydrates, has been the polarimeter. With such preliminary information at hand, a structure can often be proposed, or the best conditions for a synthetic operation can be outlined. [Pg.14]

Figure 5 Basic steps in a CL process (a) the sample and reagent(s) are introduced in the reaction cell and the final reagent is injected to initiate the CL emission, then light is monitored by the detector (b) curve showing CL intensity as a function of time after reagent mixing to initiate the reaction (the decay of the signal is due to the consumption of reagents and changes in the CL quantum efficiency with time) (c) a calibration function is established in relation to increasing analyte concentrations. Figure 5 Basic steps in a CL process (a) the sample and reagent(s) are introduced in the reaction cell and the final reagent is injected to initiate the CL emission, then light is monitored by the detector (b) curve showing CL intensity as a function of time after reagent mixing to initiate the reaction (the decay of the signal is due to the consumption of reagents and changes in the CL quantum efficiency with time) (c) a calibration function is established in relation to increasing analyte concentrations.
As it can be observed in Fig. 2, three out of the 16 investigated compounds, namely, heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and its metabolite 2-oxo, 3-hydroxy-LSD (O-H-LSD), were not detected in any wastewater sample. Two other target analytes, 6-acetyl morphine (6ACM) and A9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), were only present in influent wastewaters and with low detection frequencies. The most ubiquitous compounds, present in all influent and effluent wastewater samples analyzed, were the cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine, and the amphetamine-like compounds ephedrine (EPH) and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or ecstasy). Cocaine, cocaethylene (CE, transesterification product of cocaine formed after the joint consumption of cocaine and ethanol), and morphine (MOR) were detected in all influent, but not in all effluent wastewaters (see Fig. 2). [Pg.194]

Bloomery iron is characterized, however, by very low carbon content (Table 1) and if one wished to carry out a conventional carbon 14 dating, consumption of the entire 20 lb. bloom would have yielded only 4 or 5 grams of carbon, which is barely enough. For this reason, the Conservation-Analytical Laboratory of the Smithsonian Institution sponsored the development of the micro-scale dating procedures at Brookhaven Laboratory already referred to above [9,10]. [Pg.441]


See other pages where Consumption of analyte is mentioned: [Pg.52]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.2037]    [Pg.4400]    [Pg.1243]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.2037]    [Pg.4400]    [Pg.1243]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.736]    [Pg.660]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.250]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info