Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Conductivities comparison

We also conduct comparison surveys with a nationally representative sample of 1,000 members of the total adult public. The most recent general public survey was October 22-25 —that is, about 3 weeks after news coverage of an accident at a Japanese fuel plant. In the interest of time, I will give you only the most recent numbers, but I can tell you that the data before and after the accident are practically identical. [Pg.111]

The vehicle testing sequence comprised of the following The test vehicles as purchased from the dealers were evaluated by conducting FTP runs to assess both the engine out pollutant levels, and to measure the performance of the stock exhaust system. Next, the stock exhaust system was removed from the vehicle and the Phase 1 LHES was custom fitted to the vehicle imderbody. FTP runs were then conducted. Comparisons of the FTP runs between the stock exhaust and the fresh Phase 1 LHES have been summarized in Table 2. [Pg.924]

A) conducting comparisons among radon and radon progeny measurement techniques ... [Pg.938]

The peptide map of a trypsin hydrolysate of hen egg white lysozyme oxidized at the S—S bonds was obtained and characterized. A comparative study of it with the map of the same hydrolysate of lysozyme reduced at the S—S bonds was conducted.Comparison of the (structural) signal regions of hen egg white lysozyme and of ovine a-lactalbumin have been reported. [Pg.515]

Armco Steel Corporation conducted comparison tests on two ferritic nickel alloy steels produced in the U. S. for cryogenic service and one USSR Fe-Cr-Mn austenitic stainless steel. These studies included base plate and weldment composition, microstructure, strength, and fracture toughness. Detailed results were reported at a Soviet-American seminar [ ]. This paper summarizes these earlier publications. [Pg.529]

For example, after addition of the filler, the ionic conductivity of the electrolyte reached 2.15 mS/cm at room temperature, a more than twofold increase over the electrolyte without filler [37]. The results of electrical conductivity comparison between PEO and various nanocomposites are listed in Table 25.2, contributed by Kiyanitsa et al. [27]. [Pg.937]

With the fitted parameters available at two temperatures, predictions at intermediate temperatures can be obtained to gauge the ability of the BFCM to correctly predict the temperature dependence of conductivity. Comparisons are made with Sone s data at 45°C. One problem in attempting this is lack of reliable sorption isotherm data at temperatures near 45°C. This was remedied by implementing the chemical model of Weber and Newman developed for determining X for a vapour-equilibrated membrane [55] and using it to provide sorption isotherm data. A standard error of 0.038 was used on the activity (the same standard error as was used at 30°C) to provide error bars within which conductivity is expected to lie. [Pg.146]

All of the above comparisons have been made against the LU 2003 QRA as, due to the low incidence of fatality on the LU network as a whole (averaging 4 per annum, excluding suicide), it is not possible to conduct comparisons at any level of detail or accuracy. [Pg.245]

In the case of thermal conductivity, comparison of experimental data with results of this theory is limited to monatomic gases, as shown in Figure 5.4. As for the viscosity (Figure 5.3), so here also it appears that the revised values for 3 and 6 give a marginally better fit. However, more experimental measurements at T < 1, especially for the heavier monatomic gases, are required to confirm this. [Pg.76]

Figure 3 graphically represents the results of the helium thermal conductivity comparison and shows the deviation of the semi-empirical meAod of calculating helium thermal conductivity from the empirically derived DIPPR curve fit recommended in this paper. Figure 3 shows that NIST results track well with DIPPR results. At 1500 K (fuel pin... [Pg.438]

TABLE 1. HeXe Mixture Thermal Conductivity Comparison Results... [Pg.446]

This is an analysis frequently conducted on oil lubricants. Generally, the additive is known and its concentration can be followed by direct comparison of the oil with additive and the base stock. For example, concentrations of a few ppm of dithiophosphates or phenols are obtained with an interferometer. However, additive oils today contain a large number of products their identification or their analysis by IR spectrometry most often requires preliminary separation, either by dialysis or by liquid phase chromatography. [Pg.62]

The tendency of the color to become darker with time is often indicative of chemical degradation. The test is conducted with the aid of a colorimeter (NF T 60-104 and ASTM D 1500) and by comparison with colored glass standards. The scale varies from 0.5 to 8. The French specifications stipulate that diesel fuel color should be less than 5, which corresponds to an orange-brown tint. Generally, commercial products are light yellow with indices from 1 to 2. [Pg.247]

Under the assumption that the matrix elements can be treated as constants, they can be factored out of the integral. This is a good approximation for most crystals. By comparison with equation Al.3.84. it is possible to define a fiinction similar to the density of states. In this case, since both valence and conduction band states are included, the fiinction is called the joint density of states ... [Pg.119]

The comparison of flow conductivity coefficients obtained from Equation (5.76) with their counterparts, found assuming flat boundary surfaces in a thin-layer flow, provides a quantitative estimate for the error involved in ignoring the cui"vature of the layer. For highly viscous flows, the derived pressure potential equation should be solved in conjunction with an energy equation, obtained using an asymptotic expansion similar to the outlined procedure. This derivation is routine and to avoid repetition is not given here. [Pg.182]

One of the most sensitive tests of the dependence of chemical reactivity on the size of the reacting molecules is the comparison of the rates of reaction for compounds which are members of a homologous series with different chain lengths. Studies by Flory and others on the rates of esterification and saponification of esters were the first investigations conducted to clarify the dependence of reactivity on molecular size. The rate constants for these reactions are observed to converge quite rapidly to a constant value which is independent of molecular size, after an initial dependence on molecular size for small molecules. The effect is reminiscent of the discussion on the uniqueness of end groups in connection with Example 1.1. In the esterification of carboxylic acids, for example, the rate constants are different for acetic, propionic, and butyric acids, but constant for carboxyUc acids with 4-18 carbon atoms. This observation on nonpolymeric compounds has been generalized to apply to polymerization reactions as well. The latter are subject to several complications which are not involved in the study of simple model compounds, but when these complications are properly considered, the independence of reactivity on molecular size has been repeatedly verified. [Pg.278]

The metallic salts of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid can be prepared by reaction of the acid with the corresponding hydroxide or carbonate or by reaction of sulfonyl fluoride with the corresponding hydroxide. The salts are hydroscopic but can be dehydrated at 100°C under vacuum. The sodium salt has a melting point of 248°C and decomposes at 425°C. The lithium salt of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid [33454-82-9] CF SO Li, commonly called lithium triflate, is used as a battery electrolyte in primary lithium batteries because solutions of it exhibit high electrical conductivity, and because of the compound s low toxicity and excellent chemical stabiUty. It melts at 423°C and decomposes at 430°C. It is quite soluble in polar organic solvents and water. Table 2 shows the electrical conductivities of lithium triflate in comparison with other lithium electrolytes which are much more toxic (24). [Pg.315]

Considerable caution is necessary in making quantitative comparisons between different materials, even when considering the same toxic end point. This can be conveniendy illustrated using, as an example, death in response to a single exposure, ie, acute lethal toxicity. Studies to determine acute lethal toxicity by a particular route are usually conducted as described below. [Pg.233]

The concentration of dissolved ionic substances can be roughly estimated by multiplying the specific conductance by an empirical factor of 0.55—0.9, depending on temperature and soluble components. Since specific conductance is temperature dependent, all samples should be measured at the same temperature. Alternatively, an appropriate temperature-correction factor obtained by comparisons with known concentrations of potassium chloride may be used. Instmments are available that automatically correct conductance measurements for different temperatures. [Pg.230]

The specific conductance of the finish on the filament k is not necessarily the specific conductance it exhibits in its bulk condition. For instance, absorption of ions from the finish by the fiber can reduce the conductivity. The specific conductance greatiy depends on the amount of moisture present. Figure 4a shows the experimentally observed resistance of yam as a function of the amount of antistatic agent appHed in comparison to the calculated resistance. Below 0.05% of antistatic agent the experimental values show a lower conductivity than calculated this may be due to a lack of continuity of the antistatic agent. [Pg.292]

Fig. 8. Comparison of electrical and thermal conductivity of PAN- and pitch-based carbon fiber to metals, where P = pitch, T = Thornel, and... Fig. 8. Comparison of electrical and thermal conductivity of PAN- and pitch-based carbon fiber to metals, where P = pitch, T = Thornel, and...

See other pages where Conductivities comparison is mentioned: [Pg.891]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.891]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.2208]    [Pg.2214]    [Pg.2216]    [Pg.3000]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.426]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.78 , Pg.79 ]




SEARCH



A statistical methodology for conducting multiple comparisons

Effective thermal conductivity comparison

Explicit expression for the conductance and comparison with experiment

Insulation, comparison thermal conductivity

Poly Synthesis conductivity comparison

© 2024 chempedia.info