Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Concentration differences, calculation external

Another situation is found for the Na+ ions. When the membrane is permeable to these ions, even if only to a minor extent, they will be driven from the external to the internal solution, not only by diffusion but when the membrane potential is negative, also under the effect of the potential gradient. In the end, the unidirectional flux of these ions should lead to a concentration inside that is substantially higher than that outside. The theoretical value calculated from Eq. (5.15) for the membrane potential of the Na ions is -1-66 mV. Therefore, permeabihty for Na ions should lead to a less negative value of the membrane potential, and this in turn should lead to a larger flux of potassium ions out of the cytoplasm and to a lower concentration difference of these ions. All these conclusions are at variance with experience. [Pg.578]

We would be remiss if we did not indicate that a significant temperature difference also exists between the bulk fluid and the external surface. This AT has a far greater effect on the observed rate than does the S02 concentration difference. Illustration 12.6 indicates how the temperature difference may be calculated. [Pg.484]

Since our calculations indicate that intraparticle mass transfer limitations are significant, we must now consider the possibility that temperature and concentration differences will exist between the bulk fluid and the external surface of the catalyst. Appropriate mass and heat transfer coefficients must therefore be determined. [Pg.563]

Figure 7.10 shows the internal concentration profiles calculated according to Eqn. 7.101 for different values of the Thiele modulus. Knowing the exact internal concentration profile, Eqn. 7.101, allows us to calculate the molar flux through the external surface of the slab from Eqn. 7.80) ... [Pg.273]

Example 10-1 Experimental, global rates are given in Table 10-2 for two levels of conversion of SOj to SO3. Evaluate the concentration difference for SO2 between bulk gas and pellet surface and comment on the significance of external diffusion. Neglect possible temperature differences. The reactor consists of a fixed bed of x -in. cylindrical pellets through which the gases passed at a superficial mass velocity of 147 lb/(hr)(ft ) and at a pressure of 790 mm Hg. The temperature of the catalyst pellets was 480°C, and the bulk mixture contained 6.42 mole % SOj and 93.58 mole % air. To simplify the calculations compute physical properties on the basis of the reaction mixture being air. The external area of the catalyst pellets is 5.12 ft /lb material. The platinum covers only the external surface and a very small section of the pores of the alumina carrier, so that internal diffusion need not be considered. [Pg.368]

Figure 19.1 shows an airlift bioreactor contains external loop which is made of Pyrex glass. The bioreactor was fed with sweet cheese sterilized and deprotenized whey. The cell suspension was aseptically transferred to the bioreactor. Airlift bioreactor was operated at working volume of 7 liters that included 10% pre-culture. The regulation system allows for temperature control at 30 1°C foam-level and pH controlled by addition of antifoam and ammonia, respectively. The set-point fixed at pH 5.0 0.1. The system was aerated with filtered air at a different flow rate of 0.1, 0.4, and 0.8 vvm that was controlled using an aeration pump controller Each run was achieved in duplicates the average values of lactose, ethanol, and biomass concentrations were calculated and monitored with respect to time. [Pg.187]

In many cases, it is necessary to estimate the rate at which a heterogeneous catalytic reaction wfll proceed, if it is controlled by external mass transfer. Alternatively, it may be necessary to estimate the concentration difference (Ca,b — Ca ) and the temperature difference (7b — T ) that are required to sustain a known or measured rate of reaction. Calculations of Ca3 — Ca,s and Tb — Tg are the only way to evaluate the influence of external transport when definitive diagnostic experiments are not feasible. Calculations such as these can be performed using Eqns. (9-38) and (9-40), provided that the transport coefficients kc and h are known, or can be obtained from correlations. [Pg.362]

All membranes which have been examined so far show very different lipid (and protein) compositions for their two leaflets. A common feature of mammalian cell membranes is that the amino-phospholipids and phosphatidylinositol are concentrated in the cytosolic leaflet (Figure 6.13). In contrast, sphingolipids are highly concentrated in the external leaflet of the plasma membrane. In the bacterial example also shown in Figure 6.13 phosphatidylinositol is concentrated on the cytoplasmic face, but in the castor bean glyoxysomal membrane, whereas phosphatidylethanolamine was mainly in the outer (cytoplasmic) leaflet, the accessible phosphatidylinositol was mainly in the opposite leaflet. This latter example emphasizes two points - first that generalizations should not be made from system to system without firm evidence and, second, that the distribution calculated... [Pg.276]

Purity. Gas chromatographic analysis is performed utilizing a wide-bore capillary column (DB-1, 60 m x 0.32 mm ID x 1.0 //m film) and a flame ionization detector in an instmment such as a Hewlett-Packard 5890 gas chromatograph. A caUbration standard is used to determine response factors for all significant impurities, and external standard calculation techniques are used to estimate the impurity concentrations. AHyl chloride purity is deterrnined by difference. [Pg.35]

The external audit results are used to determine the accuracy of the measurements. Accuracy is calculated from percentage differences, dj, for the audit concentrations and the instrument response. [Pg.226]

Airflows are determined basically by a steady-state calculation for each time step. At each time step, first, pressures at external nodes are calculated on the basis of the wind pressure coefficients and the actual wind speed and direction. Then, for all conductances, the local pressures at each side of the link are calculated. At internal links, this pressure is dependent on the (unknown) zone pressure p and the aerostatic pressure variation due to the height of the link with respect to the zone reference height. At external links, this pressure is dependent on the external node pressure and the aerostatic pressure variation due to the height of the link with respect to the stack reference height. For the aerostatic pressure, the air density is determined considering the temperature, the humidity, and (if relevant) the contaminant concentrations in the zone or in the outside air, respectively. From this, the pressure differences across each conductance can be calculated, and from this the mass airflow tor each conductance /. [Pg.1086]

Unlike solid electrodes, the shape of the ITIES can be varied by application of an external pressure to the pipette. The shape of the meniscus formed at the pipette tip was studied in situ by video microscopy under controlled pressure [19]. When a negative pressure was applied, the ITIES shape was concave. As expected from the theory [25a], the diffusion current to a recessed ITIES was lower than in absence of negative external pressure. When a positive pressure was applied to the pipette, the solution meniscus became convex, and the diffusion current increased. The diffusion-limiting current increased with increasing height of the spherical segment (up to the complete sphere), as the theory predicts [25b]. Importantly, with no external pressure applied to the pipette, the micro-ITIES was found to be essentially flat. This observation was corroborated by numerous experiments performed with different concentrations of dissolved species and different pipette radii [19]. The measured diffusion current to such an interface agrees quantitatively with Eq. (6) if the outer pipette wall is silanized (see next section). The effective radius of a pipette can be calculated from Eq. (6) and compared to the value found microscopically [19]. [Pg.387]

Chiral or achiral assay and purity determinations are done according to an external calibration calculation procedure, either with or without internal standardization. The calibration is performed against a 10% w/w (compared to the nominal concentration of the sample solution at 100% w/w) reference standard solution. The sample solution for the purity determination remains at the 100% w/w level, while that of the assay determination is diluted 10 times. The reason for the difference in concentration levels is similar to the purity method. A suggested sample injection sequence can be... [Pg.67]

The calculations discussed above (Figures 4.72 to 4.77) were performed for a PFR. Figures 4.78 to 4.80 refer to a packed bed reactor with n = 3. In this case the effect of the concentration range of the external inhibitor on the signal obtained was investigated. The data in Figures 4.78 to 4.80 differ from one another with respect to the cycle time, r, of the concentration profile of... [Pg.121]

Conventional EPR techniques have been successfully used to measure the D and E values of matrix-isolated carbenes in the ground triplet state because the steady-state concentration of triplet species is sufficiently high in the system. The technique cannot be used, however, for excited species having triplet hfetimes of the order of 10-100 ns, since their steady-state concentration is too low. The D parameters are estimated from the external magnetic field effect on the T—T fluorescence decay in a hydrocarbon matrix at low temperamre. The method is based on the effect of the Zeeman mixing on the radiative and nonradiative decay rates of the T -Tq transition in the presence of a weak field. The D values are estimated by fitting the decay curve with that calculated for different D values. The D T ) values estimated for nonplanar DPC (ci symmetry) is 0.20... [Pg.437]

The primary purpose of this section has been to show the possibilities for using density and area profile data to aid in the better understanding of gas-carbon reactions. In order to determine specific reaction rates and carbon dioxide concentrations at given penetrations, it has been necessary to make assumptions which can only be approximations to the truth. Several major anomalies in the results have been found, however. The calculated concentrations of carbon dioxide at the external surface of rods reacted at 1200 (Table VI) and 1305° are not in agreement with the known carbon dioxide concentrations. Clearly, more information is required on the variation of Deir with temperature and its variation with porosity produced at different reaction temperatures. It is feasible that at high temperatures, considerable porosity may be produced without increasing Deo to such a marked extent as found at 900°. Another anomaly is the non-uniformity of reaction found at 925°, when it would be expected that the reaction should be in Zone I. The preliminary assumption of a completely interconnecting pore system may not be valid. It should also be noted that neither the value of K in Equation (75) nor the low-temperature activa-... [Pg.200]

External Standard. In this approach, related substance levels are determined by calculation using a standard curve. The concentration of related substance is determined by the response (i.e., peak area of individual related substance) and the calibration curve. A reference standard of the drug substance is typically used in the calibration. Therefore, a response factor correction may be required if the response of related substance is very different from that of the drug substance. A single-point standard curve (Figure 3.4) is appropriate when there is no significant v-intercept. Otherwise, a multipoint calibration curve (Figure 3.5) has to be used. Different types of calibration are discussed in Section 3.2.3. [Pg.31]

As a calibration procedure in ICP-MS via calibration curves, external calibration is usually applied whereby the blank solution is measured followed by a set of standard solutions with different analyte concentrations (at least three, and it is better to analyze more standard solutions in the same concentration range compared to the sample). After the mass spectrometric measurements of standard solutions, the calibration curve is created as a plot of ion intensities of analyte measured as a function of its concentration, and the linear regression line and the regression coefficient are calculated. As an example of an external calibration, the calibration curve of 239 Pu+ measured by ICP-SFMS with a shielded torch in the pgC1 range is illustrated in Figure 6.15. A regression... [Pg.193]

In the experiment, the transmission intensities for the excited and the dark sample are determined by the number of x-ray photons (/t) recorded on the detector behind the sample, and we typically accumulate for several pump-probe shots. In the absence of external noise sources the accuracy of such a measurement is governed by the shot noise distribution, which is given by Poisson statistics of the transmitted pulse intensity. Indeed, we have demonstrated that we can suppress the majority of electronic noise in experiment, which validates this rather idealistic treatment [13,14]. Applying the error propagation formula to eq. (1) then delivers the experimental noise of the measurement, and we can thus calculate the signal-to-noise ratio S/N as a function of the input parameters. Most important is hereby the sample concentration nsam at the chosen sample thickness d. Via the occasionally very different absorption cross sections in the optical (pump) and the x-ray (probe) domains it will determine the fraction of excited state species as a function of laser fluence. [Pg.354]


See other pages where Concentration differences, calculation external is mentioned: [Pg.484]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.160]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.368 ]




SEARCH



Calculation of External Concentration Differences

Concentration calculation

Concentration difference

Concentration differences, calculation

Concentrations calculating

External concentration

© 2024 chempedia.info