Compliance organizational culture

Like its popular predecessors, the book supplies a complete overview of hazard control, safety management, compliance, standards, and accreditation in the healthcare industry. This edition includes new information on leadership, performance improvement, risk management, organizational culture, behavioral safety, root cause analysis, and recent OSHA and Joint Commission Emergency Management requirements and regulatory changes. 

One element of safety management is to look at the behavior of employees and the organizational culture. Everyone has a responsibility for safety and should participate in management system efforts. Modern organization safety has progressed from safety by compliance to a more appropriate concept of prevention by planning. Reliance on compliance could translate to after-the-fact hazard detection that does not identify organizational errors that are often the contributors to incidents [5]. 

In order to manage a process safety and environmental risk program element like pre-startup safety review (PSSR), it is essential to understand the work process. As we have discussed, different facilities have different levels of risk, levels of resources, and organizational cultures to consider. If covered under OSHA PSM or EPA RMP, each facility must be able to demonstrate compliance, but how it is specifically accomplished is open to interpretation. 

For scales to measure other safety-related factors, the reader can consult Costa and Anderson (2011) for trust measures Zohar (2000) for safety climate measures Barling et al. (2002) for safety consciousness Sneddon et al. (2013) for situational awareness Neal and Griffin (2006) for safety participation and compliance Chmiel (2005) for bending the rules Cox and Cox (1991) for safety skepticism Neal et al. (2000) for safety knowledge and safety motivation Tucker et al. (2008) for employee safety voicing Tucker et al. (2008) for perceived organizational and perceived co-worker support for safety and Diaz-cabera et al. (2007) for safety culture. Another good source of information on safety measures are meta-analyses (e.g., Christian et al. 2009 Clarke 2006). 

Some explanations of non-compliance focus on the workplace. For instance, non-compliance may be associated with a negative corporate culture where compliance is not encouraged and where there may be peer pressure not to comply (Massey, 1979 Sigler and Murphy, 1988 Whitehurst, 1977). Low worker morale was a major reason for non-compliance identified by occupational health and safety inspectors in Britain (Hutter, 1997). Low morale could result for a variety of reasons. For instance, it could be a consequence of low pay or industrial action such as a work to rule or strike. Often, of course, these factors were related. A positive corporate culture, however, could encourage compliance and lead to intra-organizational pressures to comply (Bardach and Kagan, 1982). 

Dunlap is a published writer on such topics as Occupational Safety and Health Association (OSHA) compliance. Department of Transportation compliance, behavior-based safety, and organizational safety culture. His work has appeared in Professional Safety, the Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, the Journal of Emergency Medical Services, and World Grain Magazine. His most substantial work has been the publication of textbooks on motor carrier safety and auditing. His current research is in the area of industry leader development and involvement in workplace safety leadership. 

In a decentraUzed organizational structure, one location may have a stronger safety management system and a safety culture while another may be just the opposite because it has a toxic style of leadership that does not allow an in-depth safety culture. Evidence of this style is when the main emphasis is on compUance and minimal compliance at best. 

---