Morphology comparative

Frahm H.D. and Bhatnagar K. (1980). Comparative morphology of the accessory olfactory bulb in bats. J Anat 130, 349-366. 

Haley PJ, Muggenburg BA, Weissman DN, Bice DE (1991) Comparative morphology and morphometry of alveolar macrophages from six species. Am J Anat 191 401—407. 

De Bary A, Comparative Morphology and Biology of the Fungi, Mycetezoa and Bacteria, Oxford at the Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 525, 1887. 

Ploer, C.G. (1983). Comparative morphologic features of bronchiolar epithelial cells The Clara cell. Am. Rev.Resp. Dis., 128, s37-s41. 

Gaumann, E. A. and Carroll William Dodge. Comparative Morphology of the Fungi. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. 1928. 

Hoberg, E.P., Jones, A. and Bray, R.A. (1999) Phylogenetic analysis among the families of the Cyclophyllidea (Eucestoda) based on comparative morphology, with new hypotheses for co-evolution in vertebrates. Systematic Parasitology 42, 51-73. 

Tyler, S. and Hooge, M. (2004) Comparative morphology of the body wall in flatworms (Platyhelminthes). Canadian Journal of Zoology 82, 1 94-21 0. 

Zsiros V, Rojik I, Kovacs T, et al. 1997. Comparative morphological and physiological aspects of aluminum actions on central neurons and neuronal synapses of invertebrate and vertebrate animals. Neurotoxicology 18 1092. 

Steinbrecht R. A. (1969) Comparative morphology of olfactory receptor. In Olfaction and Taste III, ed. C. Pfaffmann, pp. 3-21, Rockefeller Univ. Press, New York. 

Poirier LJ, Giguere M, Marchand R (1983) Comparative morphology of the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area in the monkey, cat and rat. Brain Res Bull 77 371-397. 

Postnikov SS, Nazhimov VP, Semykin Sin, Kapranov NI. [Comparative morphological analysis of the articnlar cartilage, epiphyseal plate, spongy bone, and synovial membrane of the knee joint in children treated and not treated with ciprofloxacin.]Antibiot Khimioter 2000 45(11) 9-13. 

Fiorentini C, Arancia G, Paradisi S, etal. (1989) Effects of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B on cytoskeleton organization in Hep-2 cells A comparative morphological study. In Toxicon, 27 1209-1218. 

After the preliminary results of inoculation on the seedlings of Asparagus racemosus, the field trials were undertaken both in the college campus and at Surjeevan Farm of Besar village of Gurgaon, where the soil was sandy. The plants were uprooted after 1.5 years of plantation and comparative morphological studies indicated the following results. 

Der Marderosian, A.H., Hauke, R.L Youngken, H.W. Preliminary Studies of the Comparative Morphology and Certain Indoles of Ipomoea Seeds Economic Botany (1964) 18 67-76... 

Kramer SA, Farnham R, Glenn JF, Paulson DF. Comparative morphology of primary and secondary deposits of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1981 48 271-273. 

Grayson W, Taylor LF, Cooper K. Adenoid cystic and adenoid basal carcinoma of the uterine cervix Comparative morphologic, mucin, and immunohistochemical profile of two rare neoplasms of putative reserve cell origin. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999 23 448-458. 

Oliva E, Young RH, Clement PB, et al. Cellular benign mesenchymal tumors of the uterus A comparative morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 33 highly cellular leiomyomas and six endometrial stromal nodules, two frequently confused tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995 19 757-768. 

Gardiner, B.C., Comparative morphology of the vertical ozone profile in the Antarctic spring. Geophys Res Lett 15, 901, 1988. 

One of the purposes of this study was to investigate the effects of sucrose thin films deposited on glass substrates on cell morphology and viability, in an in vitro human fetal osteoblast system. Comparative morphological examination of the cell monolayer adhered to the plastic support (control) and sucrose thin films (S1), by phase contrast microscopy, showed no differences in cell shape and density. 

L. Comparative morphology and molecular phylogenetic analysis of three new species of the genus Karenia (Dinophyceae) from New Zealand. J. Phycol, 40, 165-179, 2004. 

The remainder of this chapter outlines the comparative morphology and function of organelles. For further reading on the division of labour inside cells, see Bourne (1970) for a descriptive atlas of the structure of cells and tissues, see Porter and Bonneville (1973). 

Wake, M. H., 1985, The comparative morphology and evolution of the eyes of caecilians (Amphibia Gymnophiona). Zoomorph. 105 277-295. 

Larochelle, R. Baron, G. 1989. Comparative morphology and morphometry of the nasal fossae of four species of North American shrews (Soricinae), Amer. J. Anat., 7 6 306-314. 

---