Communication systems channels

Communication systems, channel models of discrete memoryless, 194,208 discrete, 192 models, 193 random process, 193 source models, 193 discrete memoryless, 194 Compatibility table for magnetic groups, 742... 

A continuous lipidic cubic phase is obtained by mixing a long-chain lipid such as monoolein with a small amount of water. The result is a highly viscous state where the lipids are packed in curved continuous bilayers extending in three dimensions and which are interpenetrated by communicating aqueous channels. Crystallization of incorporated proteins starts inside the lipid phase and growth is achieved by lateral diffusion of the protein molecules to the nucleation sites. This system has recently been used to obtain three-dimensional crystals 20 x 20 x 8 pm in size of the membrane protein bacteriorhodopsin, which diffracted to 2 A resolution using a microfocus beam at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility. 

Most communication systems can be separated into the basic components shown in Fig. 4-la. Figures 4-lb, c, d, e show some specific examples of how particular systems can be separated into these components. There is, of course, considerable flexibility in this separation sometimes it is convenient to consider an antenna as part of the channel, and sometimes as part of the coder or decoder. Here... 

These examples then suggest that any general and fundamental models of communication systems (at least for digital data) should emphasize the size of the alphabets concerned and the probabilities of these letters, and should be relatively unconcerned with other characteristics of the letters. An appropriate model for this purpose consists of a random process in place of the source, a transformation on the samples of the random process for the coder, a random process at the output of the channel depending statistically on the input to the channel, and a transformation in the decoder. We are, of course, interested in knowing what transformations to use in the coder and decoder to make the decoder output as faithful a replica of the source output as possible. 

The modeling problem can only be approached intelligently after one knows the implications of the models that can be analyzed. In the following sections, we analyze simple classes of models for sources and channels. The results of that analysis give some indication of the sensitivity of communication system performance to small changes in the model this in turn sheds some light on the problem of choosing models. The simplified models of sources and channels that are analyzed in most of this chapter are now described in detail. 

Mutual Information.—In the preceding sections, self informa- tion was defined and interpreted as a fundamental quantity associated with a discrete memoryless communication source. In this section we define, and in the next section interpret, a measure of the information being transmitted over a communication system. One might at first be tempted to simply analyze the self information at each point in the system, but if the channel output is statistically independent of the input, the self information at the output of the channel bears no connection to the self information of the source. What is needed instead is a measure of the information in the channel output about the channel input. 

After a brief summary of the molecular and MO-communication systems and their entropy/information descriptors in OCT (Section 2) the mutually decoupled, localized chemical bonds in simple hydrides will be qualitatively examined in Section 3, in order to establish the input probability requirements, which properly account for the nonbonding status of the lone-pair electrons and the mutually decoupled (noncommunicating, closed) character of these localized a bonds. It will be argued that each such subsystem defines the separate (externally closed) communication channel, which requires the individual, unity-normalized probability distribution of the input signal. This calls for the variable-input revision of the original and fixed-input formulation of OCT, which will be presented in Section 4. This extension will be shown to be capable of the continuous description of the orbital(s) decoupling limit, when AO subspace does not mix with (exhibit no communications with) the remaining basis functions. 

As we have already mentioned in Section 2, in OCT the complementary quantities characterizing the average noise (conditional entropy of the channel output given input) and the information flow (mutual information in the channel output and input) in the diatomic communication system defined by the conditional AO probabilities of Eq. (48) provide the overall descriptors of the fragment bond covalency and ionicity, respectively. Both molecular and promolecular reference (input) probability distributions have been used in the past to determine the information index characterizing the displacement (ionicity) aspect of the system chemical bonds [9, 46-48]. 

In 2003, Dr. Hasna joined the Department of Electrical Engineering at Qatar University as an assistant professor. Currently, he serves as the vice president and chief academic ofScer of Qatar University. His research interests span the general area of digital communication theory and its application to performance evaluation of wireless communication systems over fading channels. His current specific research interests include cooperative communications, ad hoc networks, cognitive radio, and network coding. 

The over-all system configuration is presented in Section 7.3.1. In Sections 7.3.2, 7.3.3, and 7.3,4, we consider applications of the system to a cw radar with sinewave, Gaussian/Gaussian, and Gaussian/Lorentzian input signals, respectively. Section 7.3.5 deals with its use in an analog communications system, whereas Section 7.3.6 is concerned with low-frequency applications of the technique. A numerical example in Section 7.3.7 is followed by evaluations of system performance for binary communications and pulsed radar in the vacuum channel (Sec, 7.3.8) and in the lognormal atmospheric channel (Sec. 7.3.9). A discussion is presented in Section 7.3.10. The main results are expressed as the output SNR for the system in terms of the input SNR. 

Fig. 7.16a. Probability of error vs (SNR), for the three-frequency binary communication system in the vacuum channel. The input signals are assumed to be sinusoidal while the noise is Gaussian. The result for the conventional heterodyne system is shown for comparison (log vs linear plot)...

Bandwidth The number of discrete channels within a finite range of frequency, which defines the data transfer rate of an electronic communications system. 

Semiconductor lasers have a tremendous potential for use in optical communication systems due to their high efficiency, small size, and direct modulation capability. Because of their small size, they become the ideal source for optical radiation to be utilized in an optical fiber transmission system. The reason for developing an optical communications system is that these systems can take advantage of the large bandwidth that optics has to offer. For example, in a conventional copper wire communication system, the bandwidth of the transmission channel, i.e., the coaxial cable, is limited to approximately 300 MHz. In a normal telephone conversation, fi equency components up to 3 kHz are required for the listener to understand the conversation. By multiplexing many telephone conversations on different carrier fi equencies, approximately 100,000 conversations can be sent through a single... 

FIGURE 7 Add-drop filter for a dense wavelength division multiplexed optical communication system. Multiple streams of data carried at different frequencies F1, F2, etc. (yellow) enter the optical microchip from an external optical fiber and are carried through a waveguide channel (missing row of pores). Data streams at frequency F1 (red) and F2 (green) tunnel into localized defect modes and are routed to different destinations. The frequency of the drop filter is defined by the defect pore diameter, which is different from the pore diameter of the background photonic crystal. 

---