Coal reaction mechanism

The first anhydride plant in actual operation using methyl acetate carbonylation was at Kingsport, Tennessee (41). A general description has been given (42) indicating that about 900 tons of coal are processed daily in Texaco gasifiers. Carbon monoxide is used to make 227,000 t/yr of anhydride from 177,000 t/yr of methyl acetate 166,000 t/yr of methanol is generated. Infrared spectroscopy has been used to foUow the apparent reaction mechanism (43). 

Although the usual nomenclature in calling this solid a "residue" has been followed, such nomenclature is misleading in terms of reaction mechanism. Some of the "residue" formed in the reaction of the whole coal is genuine unreacted residue and some is a reaction product with the evidence suggesting that condensation reactions may be involved in its formation (10). 

Thus we have conducted work on the structural parameters of coal hydrogenation products using the method of Brown-Ladner (1), and from the results obtained we have developed correlations of the reaction. Based on the above, the outline of the reaction mechanisms have been previously discussed and our results have been reported (2, 3J. ... 

In the present paper samples usinig several kinds of coal and various reducing agents such as H2 / H2 + CH4, D2, °2 + tetra-lin, CD + H2O, we have carried out hydrogenation reactions. We have studied the distribution and structural parameters of the reaction products and we have further discussed the reaction mechanisms involved. 

The structural parameter changes of products of coal reduction under various reducing reaction conditions were followed up, and a discussion of the reaction mechanisms involved was made and the following conclusion were obtained. 

In order to explain the large specific incorporation of protium into the 1 position of the spent naphthalene-d8, the possible reaction mechanisms of exchange need to be examined. Naphthalene may accept a H atom from coal to initiate the reaction as shown... 

If reactions of the above type occur during extraction, one would expect that gradually less hydrogen exchange takes place as the extraction proceeds because the number of reactive groups decreases. This assumption was tested in the last experiment shown in Table V. The coal was heated for 6 hours at 340°C. with nontritiated phenanthrene prior to extraction with tritiated phenanthrene. When this pretreated coal was extracted, the tritium content of the product was only 15.6% as compared with 21.4%, in the nonpretreated product. This decreased tritium content supports the above assumption and agrees with the proposed reaction mechanism. 

At the present time, few, if any, details of chemical reaction mechanisms in coal conversion are known with certainty. This situation is particularly distressing in the areas of coal liquefaction and pyrolysis where chemical kinetics may strongly influence process efficiency and product quality. To improve this situation, in recent years a number of research groups have been performing chemical studies of coal and "model" compound reactions. 

This work presents the first systematic application of these methods to coal chemistry. This analysis is intended not only to suggest likely reaction mechanisms, but also to demonstrate the unique power of thermochemical kinetics methods for semi-quantitative analysis of the complex chemistry of coal conversion. 

Using the thermochemical estimates given above, along with the considerable body of available thermochemical and kinetic data, several plausible reaction pathways in coal and model compound reactions will now be examined. This analysis is intended to discriminate between feasible and unlikely reaction mechanisms. It should be kept in mind that absolute rate constant estimates are often only very approximate, and we are testing ideas, not proving them. 

Figure 4 The proposed reaction mechanism of the catalytic hydroliquefaction of Victorian brown coal.

Changes in the Quantity and Nature of Free Radicals During Coal Liquefaction. Although the actual reaction mechanisms involved in the liquefaction of coal via any process remain elusive, proposed mechanisms frequently invoked the formation of preasphaltenes and asphaltenes as intermediate steps. For this reason, ESR measurements were made for the series. 

Generally speaking, the complexity of the reaction mechanism should be related to the desired output accuracy and the available analysis resources. The additional dissociation steps above form the basis for attempting to predict second-order quantities, such as NOx and soot. In OEC or preheated air/fuel flames, flame temperatures are extremely high. Under such conditions, additional dissociation steps can be important. It is clear that the task of analysis becomes increasingly difficult as the reaction mechanism gets more detailed. For more-complex fuels, such as heavy hydrocarbons or coals, additional steps exist in the process of thermal decomposition, as complex fuel elements break down to simpler but more reactive species. Because such fuels consist of many component species and impurities, each of which may follow a separate path, approximations are necessary. 

Because it requires many possible variables, such as temperature, pressure, the nature of chemical reaction, and the character of the solid surface, and because it incorporates many constants which require experimental evaluation, the general mathematical model to estimate the product gas distribution for different levels of carbon conversion can become exceedingly complicated. Practical application of this model is particularly difficult when a choice has to be made between reaction mechanisms, each of which can generate complex functions with a sufficient number of arbitrary constants to fit any given experimental curve. The purpose of the work discussed in this paper was to study the influence of temperature and the partial pressure of hydrogen and steam on the rate of steam-hydrogen and coal char reactions based on the previous pilot plant data obtained at IGT (10, 11) and to develop a correlation to estimate the performance of a hydrogasification reactor in terms of its product gas distribution for different levels of carbon conversion. 

The anthracite coal with low ash and sulfur is superior coal resources, although it is a kind of high rank coal, it also occurs spontaneous combustioni 1 Spontaneous combustion of coal is a complicated process of the reaction between coal and oxygen, which includes the oxidation process at low temperature (T < 70°C) and accelerated reaction process (T > 70°C), and the oxidation process at low temperature is the key process of the coal spontaneous combustion prevention and the mechanism researchPi. Because of the weaker oxdability of the anthracite coal at the low-temperature oxidation process than other types of coal, most researches about the character of anthracite coal spontaneous combustion is still on accelerated reaction process, but few in low-temperature oxidation processP i. For the research of reaction mechanism function, thermal analysis technique is widely used because of the advantage on test speed and repeatability. However, the common thermal analysis apparatuses such as DSC and DTA are hard to get accurate changes of heat and mass with the... 

Wang Hai-hui Bogdan Z (2003). Coal oxidation at low temperatures oxygen consumption, oxidation products, reaction mechanism and kinetic modeling. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science. 29 584-513. 

When coal is heated in a slurrying vehicle, it is liquefied at 400°C-500°C (750°F-930°F). Though the reaction mechanism involving conversion of coal to oil is very complex, it appears that the interaction of coal with solvent at the initial stage of the reactions plays the vital role to determine the sequential conversion of coal substances—first to a pyridine-soluble solid and thereafter to benzene-soluble liquid hydrocarbons and low-boiling products. Thus the isolation and identification of the products of coal-solvent interactions to yield pyridine-soluble matter may provide information regarding the suitability of the coal for liquefaction. 

---