Characterization procedures

The determination of the tangents on the chart strip is difficult, as even little mistakes lead to significant deviations in the calculated N. This fact and the disappearance of the chart recorders in modern GPC units indicate another characterization procedure. 

Finally, documentation of all collection and processing steps and characterization procedures, material and measurand descriptions and results of homogeneity testing completes the RM collection/preparation phase. 

The risk characterization procedure will result in a quantitative comparison per substance of the outcome of the exposure assessment and of the effects assessment. This comparison is made through the ratio PEC/PNEC. The generic name for PEC/ PNEC in EUSES is risk characterization ratio (RCR). Other ratios are used in EUSES for the risk characterization such as the margin of safety (MOS) or the ratio of the estimated no-effect or effect level parameter to the estimated exposure level for human subpopulations and the acceptable operator exposure level (AOEL). 

The experimental apparatus has been described in detail elsewhere (11,12,22). In previous communications we have also described the porous silver catalyst film deposition and characterization procedure (11,12). Ten different reactor-cells were used in the present investigation. The cells differed in the silver catalyst surface area as shown in Table I. Catalysts 2 through 5 had been also used in a previous study (17). The reactor-cells also differed in the zirconia electrolyte thickness which could not be measured accurately. The electrolyte thickness varies roughly between 150 and 300 ym. 

A large number of chemicals, which are used for communication, attack or defense, are secreted by ants. In general, these substances are small molecules, and their availability in minute amounts (50 p,g per ant) does not allow the use of the traditional isolation and characterization procedures. Thus all of the structural work on ant substances rests on gas chromatography (GC), mass spectroscopy, and chemical synthesis. Two review articles have been published on the chemicals from the glands of ants (128, 128a) and we shall mention here only the work relevant to the pyrrolidine field. 

USEPA (1991) Methods for aquatic toxicity identification evaluations phase I toxicity characterization procedures. EPA 600/6-91/003. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Duluth... 

If reference materials are not available, the challenge study lives np to its name. Specificity may still be demonstrated by a comparison of test results containing the impurities of interest to a second, well-characterized procedure (e.g., USP method). If a secondary method is unavailable, peak purity evaluation may be used to further demonstrate specificity of the method. 

Some of the feed characterization procedures were conducted in the Resonance Magnetic Nuclear Laboratory at the National University in Colombia. In particular, the authors would like to thank Dr. Ricardo Fierro and Eliseo Abella for performing H-NMR analyses, and Dr. Carlos A. Trujillo for the UV-Vis analyses of the feeds. 

With improvements in the preparation of more active HDS catalysts, MoS2 crystallites became smaller, and traditional physical techniques for characterization such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) became limited. In fact, today s best catalysts do not exhibit XRD patterns, and the active catalyst particles can no longer be observed directly by TEM. Thus, new techniques were required to provide structural information about Co(Ni)-Mo-S catalysts. As modern surface science characterization procedures evolved, they were immediately applied to the study of CoMoSx-based... 

The performance of a catalyst is well known to be sensitive to its preparation procedure. For this reason, ideally an oxide-supported metal catalyst should be subjected to a number of characterization procedures. These may include measurements of the metal loading within the overall catalyst (usually expressed in wt%), the degree of metal dispersion (the proportion of metal atoms in the particle surfaces), the mean value and the distribution of metal particle diameters, and qualitative assessments of morphology including the particle shapes and evidence for crystallinity. These properties in turn can depend on experimental variables used in the preparation, such as the choice and amounts of originating metal salts, prereduction, calcination or oxygen treatments, and the temperature and duration of hydrogen reduction procedures. 

Thus, in order to determine the processability of petroleum a series of consistent and standardized characterization procedures are required (ASTM, 1995). These procedures can be used with a wide variety of feedstocks to develop a general approach to predict processability. The ability to predict the outcome of feedstock (especially heavy oils and residua) processing offers (1) the choice of processing sequences (2) the potential for coke lay-down on the catalyst (3) determining the catalyst tolerance to different feedstocks (4) predictability of product distribution and quality and (5) incompatibility during processing and incompatibility of the products on storage. 

Norberg-King TJ, Mount DI, Armato JR, Jersen DA, Thompson JA. 1991. Methods for aquatic toxicity identification evaluation phase I toxicity characterization procedures. 2nd ed. Duluth (MN) US Environmental Protection Agency. No. EPA/600/6-91/003. http //www.epa.gov/cgi-bin/claritgw op-Display document=clserv ORD 0235 ra nk=4 template=epa (accessed December 28, 2007). 

Another characterization procedure of the excited clusters can be obtained by ionization by a second photon and detected by mass spectrometry (processes VI and VII). Tuning this second photon, the first one being fixed on the - S0 transition of a given cluster, allows one to determine the ionization threshold of this cluster. The ionization potentials of AH and A- being significantly different, the ionization process A - HB + - A HB + + e will occur at lower energies than the AH B - AH+ - - B + e process. The two-photon ionization techniques can provide a mass selective way of detecting proton transfer in clusters. 

Classical characterization procedures of non-purified receptors were based on behavior of the radioactive label of the steroid bound to the receptor. Sucrose gradient centrifugation and gel filtration have been used for estimation of size and molecular mass (Table I, Section 2.2). Iso-electric focussing under non-denaturing conditions revealed iso-electric points between 4.5 and 6.0 for the monomeric forms. 

The experimental apparatus and the silver catalyst preparation and characterization procedure is described in detail elsewhere (10). The porous catalyst film had a superficial surface area of 2 cm2 and could adsorb approximately (2 +. 5) 10-b moles O2 as determined by oxygen chemisorption followed by titration with ethylene (10). The reactor had a volume of 30 cm3and over the range of flowrates used behaved as a well mixed reactor (10, 11). Further experimental details are given in references (10) and (11). 

The preparation and characterization procedures have been described elsewhere [18,19]. 

When the carbonization process is divided into its distinct physical and chemical parts and both are considered according to their contributions to the overall process, only then is a description of the mechanism possible. Carbon precursors and the products of their carbonization are characterized by various test methods whose objectives can be the control of coking, a description of the carbon or the determination of its suitability for further application. This paper considers the significance of selected common characterization procedures. 

---