Chain copolymerization solvent effect

For any specific type of initiation (i.e., radical, cationic, or anionic) the monomer reactivity ratios and therefore the copolymer composition equation are independent of many reaction parameters. Since termination and initiation rate constants are not involved, the copolymer composition is independent of differences in the rates of initiation and termination or of the absence or presence of inhibitors or chain-transfer agents. Under a wide range of conditions the copolymer composition is independent of the degree of polymerization. The only limitation on this generalization is that the copolymer be a high polymer. Further, the particular initiation system used in a radical copolymerization has no effect on copolymer composition. The same copolymer composition is obtained irrespective of whether initiation occurs by the thermal homolysis of initiators such as AIBN or peroxides, redox, photolysis, or radiolysis. Solvent effects on copolymer composition are found in some radical copolymerizations (Sec. 6-3a). Ionic copolymerizations usually show significant effects of solvent as well as counterion on copolymer composition (Sec. 6-4). 

Counterion effects similar to those in ionic chain copolymerizations of alkenes (Secs. 6-4a-2, 6-4b-2) are present. Thus, copolymerizations of cyclopentene and norbomene with rhenium- and ruthenium-based initiators yield copolymers very rich in norbomene, while a more reactive (less discriminating) tungsten-based initiator yields a copolymer with comparable amounts of the two comonomers [Ivin, 1987]. Monomer reactivity ratios are also sensitive to solvent and temperature. Polymer conformational effects on reactivity have been observed in NCA copolymerizations where the particular polymer chain conformation, which is usually solvent-dependent, results in different interactions with each monomer [Imanishi, 1984]. 

Solvents affect free-radical polymerization reactions in a number of different ways. Solvent can influence any of the elementary steps in the chain reaction process either chemically or physically. Some of these solvent effects are substantial, for instance, the influence of solvents on the gel effect and on the polymerization of acidic or basic monomers. In the specific case of copolymerization then solvents can influence transfer and propagation reactions via a number of different mechanisms. For some systems, such as styrene-acrylonitrile or styrene-maleic anhydride, the selection of an appropriate copolymerization model is still a matter of contention and it is likely that complicated copolymerization models, incorporating a number of different phenomena, are required to explain all experimental data. In any case, it does not appear that a single solvent effects model is capable of explaining the effect of solvents in all copolymerization systems, and model discrimination should thus be performed on a case-by-case basis. 

It was reported by Barb in 1953 that solvents can affect the rates of copolymerization and the composition of the copolymer in copolymerizations of styrene with maleic anhydride [145]. Later, Klumperman also observed similar solvent effects [145]. This was reviewed by Coote and coworkers [145]. A number of complexation models were proposed to describe copolymerizations of styrene and maleic anhydride and styrene with acrylonitrile. There were explanations offered for deviation from the terminal model that assumes that radical reactivity only depends on the terminal unit of the growing chain. Thus, Harwood proposed the bootstrap model based upon the study of styrene copolymerized with MAA, acrylic acid, and acrylamide [146]. It was hypothesized that solvent does not modify the inherent reactivity of the growing radical, but affects the monomer partitioning such that the concentrations of the two monomers at the reactive site (and thus their ratio) differ from that in bulk. 

Ethylene oxide/styrene block copolymers have been further free-radical copolymerized with other ethylenically unsaturated compounds such as methyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid in benzene, tetrahydrofuran, and dimethylformamide (176). Correlations were made between reactivity ratio and solvent dielectric constant, as well as between solubility parameters of reaction solvent and growing polymer chains with marked effects apparent. Gel permeation chromatography of diblock and triblock copolymers based on polystyrene and poly(ethylene oxide) has revealed interesting molecular characteristics (177). Such block copolymers have an amphiphilic character. In aqueous solution, the polymers form spherical micells with a polystyrene core and a poly(ethylene oxide) outer sheath. The investigations used an aqueous-methanolic solution and were able to ascertain block copolymer structures and to estimate the impurities in the diblock copolymer. 

Any understanding of the kinetics of copolymerization and the structure of copolymers requires a knowledge of the dependence of the initiation, propagation and termination reactions on the chain composition, the nature of the monomers and radicals, and the polymerization medium. This section is principally concerned with propagation and the effects of monomer reactivity on composition and monomer sequence distribution. The influence of solvent and complcxing agents on copolymerization is dealt with in more detail in Section 8.3.1. 

The free-radical nature of ATRP is well established through a number of studies [Matyjaszewski et al., 2001], The effects of inhibitors and retarders, solvents, and chain-transfer agents are the same in ATRP as in conventional radical polymerization. The regio-selectivity, stereoselectivity, and copolymerization behaviors are also the same. 

In hydrocarbon solvents it is known that most of the growing chains are associated and it is necessary to enquire what effect this has on the copolymerization mechanism. The reactivity ratios measured from copolymer composition are unaffected because they refer to a common ion-pair. The equilibrium constants for association cancel and the reactivity ratios measured give a true measure of the relative propagation constants of the two monomers. No assessment can be made of the real reactivity of two types of active chain with the same monomer, however. In this case the observed rates are a function of the relative reactivities of the free ion-pairs and also of the relative extents of association. For example in hydrocarbon solvents polystyryllithium reacts with butadiene much more rapidly than does polybutadienyllithium. Until we know the two equilibrium constants for self-association we cannot find out if the increased rate is due to greater intrinsic reactivity or to a higher concentration of free polystyryllithium. In polar solvents or in hydrocarbon solvents in the presence of small amounts of ethers, these difficulties do not arise as self-association is no longer important. 

In the alkyllithium initiated polymerizations of vinyl monomers, Lewis bases such as ethers and amines alter the kinetics, stereochemistry, and monomer reactivity ratios for copolymerization. In general, the magnitude of these effects has been directly or indirectly attributed to the extent or nature of the interaction of the Lewis base with the organolithium initiator or with the organolithium chain end of the growing polymer. Unfortunately, all of these observed effects are kinetic in nature, and therefore the observed effects of solvent represent a composite effect on the transition-state versus the ground state as shown below in Eq. (6), where 5 represents the differential... 

The solution thus consists of different particles denoted as contact ion pairs, solvent-separated ion pairs and free ions. The fraction of the individual particles depends on the type of salt, type of solvent, polymerization system, temperature, and salt concentration. The catalytic effect of these particles may be very different as is evident in anionic polymerization of vinyl monomers. For instance, free polystyryl anion is 800times more reactive than its ion pair with the sodium counterion 60 . From this fact it follows that, although the portion of free ions is small in the reaction system, they may play an important role. On the other hand, anionic polymerization and copolymerization of heterocycles proceeds mostly via ion pairs. This is due to a strong localization of the negative charge on the chain-end heteroatom which strongly stabilizes the ion pair itself62. Ionic dissociation constants and ion contributions to the reaction kinetics are usually low. This means that for heterocycles the difference between the catalytic effect of ion pairs and free ions is much weaker than for the polymerization of unsaturated compounds. This is well documented by the copolymerization of anhydrides with epoxides where the substi-... 

---