Catalytic coal liquids process

CCL [Catalytic coal liquids] A catalytic process developed by Gulf Oil Corporation. The main objective is the production of clean-burning liquid fuels for power plants. 

Catalytic Coal Liquid (CCL) process, 6 848 Catalytic coke yield, 11 705 Catalytic constant, 10 254 Catalytic converter(s), 10 31, 39 40 26 719. See also Three-way catalytic converter... 

Catalytic coal liquefaction processes do not specifically use hydrogen donor solvents although coal is introduced into the liquefaction reactor as a slurry in a recycle liquid stream. Catalyst is used as a powder or as granules such as pellets or extrudates. If powdered catalyst is used, it is mixed with the coal/liquid stream entering the reactor. Pelleted catalyst can be used in fixed bed reactors if precautions are taken to avoid plugging with solids or in fluidized bed reactors. In the latter case, the reacting system is actually a three phase fluidized bed, that is, catalyst particles and coal solids, as well as liquid, are fluidized by gas. 

FIGURE 19.16 Gulf catalytic coal liquids (CCL) process. 

LSE [Liquid solvent extraction] A coal liquifaction process, under development in 1990 by British Coal, at Point of Ayr, North Wales. The coal is dissolved in a coal-derived hydrocarbon solvent and then catalytically hydrocracked. 

Catalytic cracking processes evolved in the 1930s from research on petroleum and coal liquids. The petroleum work came to fruition with the invention of acid cracking. The work to produce liquid fuels from coal, most notably in Germany, resulted in metal sulfide hydrogenation catalysts. In the 1930, a catalytic cracking catalyst for petroleum that used solid acids as catalysts was developed using acid-treated clays. 

The available information leads one to believe that the maximum production of liquids with no net hydrogen consumption and the low-temperature catalytic hydrocarbonization/gasification are alternatives which appear to have great merit. The former of these, when applied to western coals, appears to be technically ready for commercial application and economically competitive with alternative coal liquefaction processes. Advantages of the flash hydropyrolysis processes over the Coalcon process are difficult to perceive. 

We have our work divided into process engineering, process chemistry, catalysis, and support technology. As an example, one of the indirect liquefaction projects, tube wall reactor, deals with the design and operation of high thermal efficiency catalytic reactors for syn-gas conversion. Other activities are coal liquefaction properties of coal minerals, the role of catalysts, coal liquid product stability, and environmental impact—to name a few. 

This chapter reports results of applying a catalytic hydrorefining process to four coal liquids solvent-refined coal (SRC) process filter feed, SRC extract product, Synthoil, and H-Coal process hydroclone underflow. The achieved upgrading is evaluated in terms of reduction in benzene and heptane insolubles, reduction in sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen, an increase in hydrogen content, and a yield of lower boiling products. 

Several processes have been developed for coal liquefaction. Large-scale pilot plants have been in operation for the solvent-refining coal (SRC) process, and a pilot plant is being constructed for the H-Coal process, which is a direct catalytic process. Construction of demonstration plants is under consideration. The coal liquids produced from the current processes contain large amounts of residual fuels. They probably will be used initially as boiler fuels for stationary power plants. However, the nitrogen content of coal liquids is much higher than the petroleum residual fuels. The sulfur contents of coal liquids can vary considerably they depend on the type of coal and the liquefaction process used. Current coal liquefaction processes are capable of produc-... 

Microstructure. The characterization of coal-derived asphaltene is quite similar to that of petroleum-derived asphaltene. Since it is anticipated that coal-derived asphaltene will have acid/neutral and base characteristics (26, 36), the average structure of both must be considered. In Table III, Structure I is amphoteric (or slightly basic), and Structure II is an acid/neutral representation. A mixture of both may be typical of the average structure of a coal-derived asphaltene. At present, we will illustrate this by an asphaltene obtained from coal liquid of the Synthoil process. (The coal is hvAb, West Kentucky, Homestead Seam the coal liquid is obtained by catalytic hydrogenation at 450° C and 4000 psig having %C, 86.7 %H, 8.38 %N, 0.93 %S, 0.09 %Q, 3.2 and %Ash, 0.7.)... 

It was shown previously that coal liquids from five major demonstration processes (Synthoil, HRI H-Coal, FMC-COED, PAMCO SRC, and Catalytic Inc. SRC) could be separated reproducibly, in high yields (94-99%) into five fractions by solvent fractionation (1,2). We now wish to report structural characterization parameters obtained for these materials by the use of proton nuclear magnetic resonance ( H NMR). 

Figures 4, 5, and 6 are MI fluorescence spectra of Fractions IV, V, and VI, respectively, from the LC of a sample of Synthoil, a catalytic hydrodesulfurization process coal liquid. By comparison with MI fluorescence spectra of standard PAH, the following compounds can be identified conclusively in the indicated fractions pyrene (IV), benz[a]-...

---